Tags
ABERRO AGENDA, aberro-sex agenda, Big Gender, Cardinal Burke, Catholic Church, Eponymous Flower blog, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, Fr. Z, Francis Effect, Genderism, Giuseppe Nardi, Great Cardinal, Harvesting the Fruits blog, heretical pope, hippies, Jesuits, John Paul II, Joseph Ratzinger, latae sententiae, Louie Verrecchio, messeging, Modernists, MSM, narratives, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, new springtime, optics, Pagan Christians, pathological, Polls, Pope Francis, Raymond Burke, risk event, Roman Curia, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, Soap Bubble Papacy™, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, State of Necessity, supplied jurisdiction, sustainability, Synod 2014, Team Bergoglio, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Vatican, Vatican II
Today I draw your attention to the recent book written by Edward Pentin that provides detailed background as to what transpired at the Secret Synod of Bishop’s of 2014. This book has been released by Ignatius Press. (see here)
The below video is the book promotion interview that Edward Pentin gave to Raymond Arroyo of ETWN.
The reason that I am posting the video, along with partial transcripts and a passage and link from a Fr. Z post below, is that they provides more confirmation as to the TRUE AGENDA of the Synod of Bishops of both 2014 and 2015, the TRUE AGENDA as we have laid it out over a series of posts, starting on the 18th of December 2014 titled The Synod of the Three Paragraphs (see here), with the most recent on the Sunday 6th of September 2015 titled A “Small” Embedded Risk Event. (see here)
I am reproducing the below for your information and FOR THE RECORD:
Here is a fragment of the transcripts from the above interview
Arroyo: You suggest in the book (Ed note: The Rigging of a Vatican Synod?) that this is all a Trojan horse.
Pentin: Yes, this is one view that…that… the divorce and remarriage issue was being used by certain people in the Synod to push through another agenda.
Arroyo: And what was that other agenda?
Pentin: That other agenda basically centered on validating same-sex unions within the Church, changing the Church’s views on human sexuality, the Church’s doctrine in a sense, so the Church’s pastoral practice, which in turn… they argue affects doctrine. So in loosening of the teaching on cohabitation for example, and so forth…
Arroyo: It was that interim report, the report that sort of coalesced and gathered all the interventions and the conversations throughout the first half of this process, they issue this interim report, that is what caused so many fireworks…
Pentin: Yes
Arroyo: because it was released to the public, to the press before the cardinals even got a glimpse of it. Tell me how that came to be and many cardinals said this bears no relations to the conversation we’ve been having. In fact, nobody even talked about homosexuality or communion for divorced/remarried people. We barely had a conversation about that.
Pentin: Yes This is what really alerted people to that fact that they thought there was some… some sort of rigging going on, because they…they said we didn’t hear about these things discussed during the first week and suddenly they were front and center and they were put out to the press before they were even heard… and before they had even seen the report themselves. So they argue that there was… that that was being pushed through…
Please view the rest of the video.
On an aside, there is a post at Fr. Z’s blog about this book and resulting vapors that some of the less masculine members of the “c”atholic press are experiencing due to its publication. I am posting the link for your viewing pleasure here.
If one goes to the Fr. Z link, one will read a passage that he reproduces, a passage of text from the heretic Michael Sean Winters of the “Fishwrap”. In the Fishwrap piece, we find the following passage with Fr. Z usual commentary in []: (emphasis added)
I thought the language on homosexuality in the Interim Report was unimpeachable: It basically said everyone should be welcomed in the Church. Full stop. [Not quite full stop, no. First, they were vague. What does “welcome” mean? In the civilized world is there a Catholic parish that turns homosexuals away? Not a one. It isn’t a sin to be a homosexual. Does it mean give them Holy Communion without emendation of life if they are openly sexually active? What does “welcome” mean? Should we have them stand up during Mass so we can all say “Bravo!”? Also, are we to welcome homosexuals because they are homosexuals or because they are people? There was clearly an agenda hidden inside the vague language.] It happily, and hopefully, avoided the language of “intrinsic disorder” which, whatever its theological precision, which is questionable, its pastoral significance is obvious and malign.
Nuff said!
PS h/t to Richard Malcolm for drawing my attention to this video.
The Deus Ex Machina Blog 
Thnnikig like that shows an expert’s touch
LikeLike
Keep your eye out for the Motu Proprio coming out tomorrow as well. I believe these will set the scene for the Synod and will explain why Burke had to be got out of the way.
Right now would be a good point for somebody to start the process for deposing a Pope.
LikeLike
Yes, this MP will be bad. I think that Francis is on his last legs. It is only a question of time before the Roman equivalents of the “men in grey suits” come a’calling.
What all are waiting for is for card. Muller to respond. Francis and his merry men have targeted him and he now needs to respond.
ON an aside, wonder if Francis gave the MP to card. Muller for the “theological structuring”?
LikeLike
One more thing, supporting evidence that Francis’ time might be up is the speed with which he has written this MP. There are going to be two from what I understand. It appears that he is trying to break up as much of the china as he possibly can before he is excorted out of the store.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Heretic Between Adultery And Sodomy | Mundabor's Blog
Glad to be of help, S.A…
When the Pentin book came out, and the coverage of it – especially on this point – amped up this last week, I was astounded to see such a complete mainstream Catholic media vindication of your thesis. And I know of at least a couple other major online Catholic outlets planning to dig into this Trojan Horse revelation in the coming week.
And it has not gone unnoticed among those wearing purple and red. More episcopal broadsides will be heard before the Synod opens next month. I have the feeling that this will not be a boring Synod.
LikeLike
Hi:
What I find simply hilarious is that the “progressives” suppressed scholasticism and Thomism, which in turn reduced “c”atholicism to a religion along the lines of the ancient Egyptians or the pre-Columbian indians “spirit” worship.
And along comes a blogger who has a solid Catholic education (0 – undergrad) and some basic analytical tools (i.e. William of Ockham’s razor). And by simply observing them, this armchair analyst can read these progressives like a book.
So the question that needs to be asked is: why haven’t all those princes of the Church, with their classical theological educations picked this up?
As to the 3rd week of the Synod, when all the fireworks will be going off, I am also quite confident that this Synod will be more controlled than the last one was. If for no other reason, than because we have the “theological structurer” that Francis will have to run his AE past before it gets promulgated.
Having said that, got to keep our guard up, cause those heretics are “wascelly wabbits”.
LikeLike
Hi Richard,
Just finished reading MondayVatican. If Gagliarducci is correct, the Stealth Sex Synod of 2015 will NOT have: 1) an interim Relatio, 2) a formal final Relatio, 3) no general discussions, just small group discussions, 4) small group “papers” resulting from Synod will be secret and given to Francis to make final speech (i.e nobody will even know what is in them and finally, no Apostolic Exhortation (to get around the “theological structurer”.
From what AG wrote, it would appear that their will be no formal document that will be produced at the end of this disastrous synod.
Unbelievable, if this is true.
Link here: http://www.mondayvatican.com/vatican/pope-francis-what-is-his-pontificates-upcoming-agenda
LikeLike
Given the outcry that forced publication of the reports at the end of last year’s Synod, it’s hard to believe that Francis would force the suppression of the reports next month, either. I have the sense that Gagliarducci doesn’t really think he will, either.
The return to power of the Sodano faction at State is not a surprise; indeed, I think many of us expected it all along. Just the same, it’s interesting to see it confirmed. Remarkable how the bold new future is ending up being a retread of yesterday’s failures.
LikeLike
“So the question that needs to be asked is: why haven’t all those princes of the Church, with their classical theological educations picked this up?”
Just consider the criteria that usually predominate in the selection of bishops.
In my experience, with rare exceptions, bishops are a fairly unimpressive lot. The most common skillset they have is the ability to advance their own career.
LikeLike
Little Bergoglios.
LikeLike