Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


We left off our last post on the morning of the 22nd of October 2015, in the Synod Hall where Cardinal Walter Kasper just received the proposed Final Relatio from the Synod Secretariat and realized that it was nothing more than the Instrumentum Laboris that the Secretariat had produced sometime in May of 2015. This event no doubt created a situation for Card. Kasper that we described as his very own Henry Hill moment, i.e. where “everything went sideways in a split second, and he suddenly and with extreme clarity realized that he didn’t understand anything at all except that he’s sitting at a table with a maniac.”

Today we will look at the evidence that allows us to make the above assertion.

This decisions that Cd. Walter Kasper and the Heretical Clericalists made, along with the facts presented by Giussepe Nardi, allows the careful observer to draw conclusions that will shine the light of day onto the TRUE AGENDA driving the Heretical Clericalists and the entire bi-synod process, since it was at the behest of Card. Kasper that Francis called this bi-Synod of Bishops in the first place.

So as usual, first background and facts.

On the MondayVatican blog from the 10th of March 2014, right after the consistory, the following passage appears: (emphasis added)

Cardinal Walter Kasper has called for a «Council-like solution» to the issue in his presentation during the consistory on the family. This «Council-like solution» is a reference to the approach taken by the Second Vatican Council to issues like religious freedom and ecumenism. i.e., not to change the tradition, but to create new openings. The issue now is that of a change of paradigm regarding the doctrine for the divorced and remarried. (see here)

We know from our analysis that this was not the TRUE AGENDA of the bi-Synod, but just to drive the point home, here is Andre Gagliarducci again:

… Ultimately, Kasper recognized that the problem of divorced and remarried who want to receive communion relates to a small portion of believers. And the theme of the divorced and remarried is addressed only in the fifth section of the speech. But it is nevertheless the real focus. And the text reaches this focal point through a series of opaque, almost misleading, statements.

Note bene: where we find contradictory claims, i.e. that Communion for public sinners will “re-fill” the empty German church pews, yet the public sinners represent a “small portion of believers” and this irrational (TRANSRATIONAL) position is supported with a series of opaque, almost misleading, statements, we can assume that we have a HIDDEN AGENDA at work.

So what could the TRUE AGENDA be for Card. Kasper and the German Bishops’ Conference?

This is the subject of the below post.

Initially the Pierce/Ockham pragmatic methodology (see here) pointed to the introduction of GENDER IDEOLOGY into Catholic moral doctrine and ecclesiastical law. This HYPOTHESIS was based on two premises: the first is the inordinate amount of money that the GENDER LOBBY is spending to promote GENDER IDEOLOGY globally, and second is the complete and utter obsession with what is commonly refered to as the “spirit of the times”, or zeitgemäß (which can mean “modern,” “suitable,” or even “appropriate,” and often carries all of these shades when applied to the Church) of this clique of GERMAN HERETICAL CLERICALISTS. Summing up, by promoting GENDER IDEOLOGY, the German Heretical Clericalists not only tap into GENDER LOBBY funding but also get “seats at the various GLOBALIST tables”. So it is not surprising that this GENDER AGENDA is now being explicitly promoted by not only the German Bishops’ Conference but by Francis himself.

However, it appears from the information in the Eponymous Flower posts (see here and here) that there is an even DEEPER HIDDEN AGENDA at work, one that is driving Kasper, “Bling” Marx and Co.  and might go a long way to explain the TRANSRATIONAL decisions that this group made between the 22nd and 24th of October 2015. On an aside, it is the observation of these actions that caused your humble blogger his Henry Hill moment.

For clarity’s sake, I will use a decision tree diagram to provide a visual representation of this interesting phenomenon. This decision tree diagram sets out the respective players of the TRIPARTITE and their respective decisions.

Decision TreeWhat is important to observe from the above is the following:

  1. Up until the 22nd of October 2015, the positions (AGENDAS) of the Secretariat (Francis) and the Heretical Clericalists (Kasper) were aligned.
  2. These two groups broke rank after the 22nd of October 2015.
  3. The most likely reason why these two groups broke ranks was because the Secretariat gave the Synod Fathers a proposed Final Relatio that was known to be unacceptable to the Synod Fathers.
  4. If the Secretariat’s Final Relatio was brought up for a vote, the Synod Fathers would have publicly rejected this document.
  5. The rejection of the Final Relatio would have caused a FAILED PAPACY.
  6. A FAILED PAPACY would have had unforeseeable consequences.
  7. One consequence which all sides agree on and anticipated if the situation in point 6. would have transpired, is a schism within the Catholic Church.
  8. The Secretariat (Francis) did not place a large weight on whether their actions cause a schism.
  9. The Heretical Clericalists (Kasper) placed a great weight on whether their actions cause a schism, and were willing to compromise in order to avoid the schism.

Therefore, from the decision tree diagram above, it is quite evident that it is the issue of Schism where Francis and the Germans part company.

So the question is why are the German’s so terrified of creating a Schism, a Schism with which they threaten the Catholic Church on a regular basis? (see here) Please recall that this “new opening” is supposed being orchestrated in order to bring in the “new VII springtime” that will fill the pews and set up the Marxist (as in Reinhard “Bling”) “great age of Christendom which lies not behind us, but before us!”

So in this case, it would be reasonable to expect that the Heretical Clericalists would make good on their “Germany is not a branch of Rome” threat and allow the “new springtime of the spirit of Vatican II” to usher in this new age of “Christendom which lies not behind us, but before us!”

But yet, the actions of the German Heretical Clericalists are quite different then those that one would expect based on the positions that which they publicly expose. So why is that?

First of all, we see that the entire Synod Crisis that developed on the 22nd of October 2015 had its epicenter in the Circulus Germanicus. To be more precise, the entire CRISIS played itself out inside the Circulus Germanicus. Both protagonists, the diplomat and the authority figure who resolved (allegedly) the CRISIS were German.

The second important feature of this CRISIS is that it played itself out on the “theological” stage. What is interesting to note is that by designating Kasper as the head of the Heretical Clericalists (not a lead player from the German Episcopate), we begin to see the “theological” stage where three of the four main characters are German theologians, i.e. Cd. Muller, Cd. Kasper and Benedict XVI, while the emissary who reconciles the warring factions also being German i.e. Cd. Shonborn.

So from the above facts, we are beginning to see a clearer picture of what in fact played out. What we see is an IDEOLOGUE, i.e. Card. Kasper who is a representative of an IDEOLOGICAL School. Let’s call this the Rahnerist Nouvelle Théologie School. Kasper’s lifes work can be seen as nothing more than to promote this IDEOLOGICAL school. This IDEOLOGICAL school in turn is needed by the neo-Modernist German bishops since it gives them a philisophical base on which they can function. The reason that the German Heretical Clericalists need Rahnerism is that its “something” (if only because there is so much of it) that gives the German Clericalists a basis in which to justify their actions. But the problem with Rahnerism, just like with the wider neo-Modernist movement is as follows: (see here)

The key to the neomodernist capture of power is however also the reason for their failure to sustain a religious culture. Neomodernism is not like Protestantism, which contains ideas with a positive content as well as being a rejection of Catholicism. These ideas – justification by faith, and the like – are not correct, but they say something substantial, and have an appeal that can give rise to an important movement. Neomodernism, however, on a religious level is a purely negative thesis. As a result it has no attractive force of its own, and ecclesiastical structures that fall into its grip eventually die away – a process now visible all over the world..

And the dying German Catholic Church is visible for all to see!

So taking all this into account, what most likely played out in those fateful days of 22nd to 24nd of October 2015 is that Cd. Shonborn came to Benedict XVI, at the behest of Card. Kasper with a plea. The plea most likely had to do with Benedict XVI, as the preeminent theologian and philosopher of our age, to provide the Circulus Germanicus the proper “Modernist Magic Words” that would “difuse the Kasper bomb”. The solution needed was on the one hand, to allow cd. Muller and the Catholic Synod Fathers the language that would not change doctrine, while allowing Kasper and the Heretical Clericalists the language to save face.

But Benedict XVI’s motivation was not to help out his fellow countrymen who created this two-year nightmare that spun out of control. Benedict’s motivation most likely revolved around saving the institution of the papacy. And with a lunatic like Francis, one which ascended to the throne due to an unwise decision by Benedict, it was the least that he could do in this situation.

Which brings us back to Cardinal Kasper. What we see is in essence a figure who spent his whole life promoting a theological/philosophical school of thought that time had passed by. He knows that Rahnerism has passed its due date, which is why he is so terrified of a Schism. In other words, he wants to hedge his bets, unlike that other Modernist dimwhit in white. But I digress… Instead of moving on with the zeitgemäß of the times, Kasper is trying to keep the Rahnerist hope alive. And he is doing it with sheer will.

In fact, if due to his insistance on calling this bi-Synod, Kasper gets Francis, who came into contact with Rahnerism while at the seminary (see here), to act out that which Rahner espoused, it will be because of one thing and one thing only…

Kasper’s Triumph of the Will!

I will end here for today.

Advertisements