Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


 

key-to-success
In today’s post I will attempt to do a little house cleaning. Over the last couple of posts, I have tried to focus on the et Invisibilium part of the Visibilium Omnium, et Invisibilium.

To be more specific, I have tried to demonstrate the PROCESS that is presently taking place whereby a clique of dishonest “journalists” and their corrupt MAIN STREAM MEDIA employers are trying to create a VIRTUAL REALITY so that their Establishment candidate, Sick, Crooked, Unelectable Hillary Clinton can win the Presidential Election.

I have also identified this same PROCESS at work in the ecclesiastical sub-set of the Visibilium Ominium, that part that constitutes the governing “soviet” (see here) of the Francis pontificate. And it is not coincidental that your humble blogger uses “marxist/leninist/maoist” terminology when describing that cabal holed up on the 4th floor of the Domus Sanctae Marthae. Actually, these people are as close as one gets, to anyone promoting an  IDEOLOGICALLY pure version of Marxism these days. And just like in the US Presidential Campaign, a CORRUPT Main Stream and “c”atholic Media is propping up this OBJECTIVE EPIC FAILURE that is the Francis pontificate.

So what in fact is happening is that the SAME PROCESS is being used in two different sub-sets of the Visibilium Omnium to create a VIRTUAL REALITY as to allow certain interests to either maintain (Francis) or acquire (Hillary) power and control.

So today, your humble blogger will be speaking about PROCESS.

As to referencing Marxism when describing the residents occupying a certain floor of the Ricca hostel Domus Sancae Marthae, please see here.

Here’s a visual…

jesuits-ii

Need I say more…

Still don’t see the connection?

Allow me to explain.

Today we will drill into the part of the et Invisibilium that constitutes  the PROCESSES part. And like the good Thomists that we are, first we start with a definition: (see here)

et Invisibilium – all the non-material laws and processes that regulate the visibilium omnium (e.g. the laws of physics – classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, laws of mathematics, rules of logic, etc.)

And as you may well have figured out by now, when we speak PROCESSES, we mean those actions that are undertaken during the course of human activity that are subject to the LAWS of the et Invisibilium.

And the manner in which we test to see whether those PROCESSES undertaken are OBJECTIVELY GOOD is through what we termed the 1st Principle of the LEX ARMATICUS. The 1st Principle of the LEX ARMATICUS states that:

1nd Principle:

Those individuals and institutions that comply to the et Invisibilium, will remain a part of the Visibisium Omnium. Those that do not, will be consigned to the trash heap of history.

And naturally, it follows that if a PROCESS conforms to the LEX ARMATICUS, it will have a SUCCESSFUL (OBJECTIVELY GOOD) outcome. And vice versa, if a PROCESS does not conform to the LEX ARMATICUS, it will …. be consigned to the trash heap of history.

Furthermore, by understanding the LEX ARMATICUS, we can OBSERVE a PROCESS as it is unfolding and PREDICT whether that PROCESS will have a POSITIVE OUTCOME.

OBJECTIVELY speaking, off course… (in reference to the cartoon above.)

Note Bene: This is what we are presently doing when observing The Donald in the wider CONTEXT of the US Presidential campaign.

And naturally, this PREDICTIVE ability that the LEX ARMATICUS provides us will allow us to JUDGE which part of any given PROCESS we want to support, and which given PROCESS we don’t want to touch with the proverbial “10 foot pole”.

So those are the basics.

Now let’s do a practical application exercise. In a post titled  EXCLUSIVE – The Marxist Revolutionary: New Jesuit Superior-General revealed by those who knew him in Venezuela to which we linked above, we can read the following: (emphasis added)

In 1989 there was a big popular uprising in Caracas due to the work of a liberal Minister of Economy. It was known afterwards that Fidel Castro was behind it. The “grassroots communities” of the Jesuits worked very actively and the radio in charge of which were mostly the Jesuits, “Fe y alegría”, played an active subversive role. Thus, they became co-responsible in the death of 2,000 people.

Later, the Jesuits worked actively in the coming of the Chavista revolution. There were Jesuits who opposed Chávez, that is true. Some very strongly. Now, in April 2002, when Chávez was out of office for a couple of days, people heard Father Sosa proclaim that the grassroots “Christian” communities would defend the Revolution to death, that the “right-wing” [?] would see the strength of the Revolution…

So what we have in the above two paragraphs is a description of a PROCESS. That process can be termed as the “collectivization of the Venezuelan ECONOMY” with the staunch help of a part of the Society of Jesus and some of it’s members, specifically one Fr. Arturo Sosa Abascal. 

Given the above, the next question should be: so,  how did this PROCESS work out?

By all OBJECTIVE accounts, the answer is: NOT SO WELL.

As my loyal readers know, I have been following the situation in what we call the FrancisEconomy of Venezuela with respect to the ECONOMIC sub-set of human activities of the Visibilium Omnium, et Invisibilium for some time now. (see here and here and here and here)

One post that was produced, namely  Francis’ One-Percenters! explained the situation on the ground:

The latest glaring example of the disgusting and immoral corruption of socialism’s one percenters is Venezuela, a country that has “long been the darling of the [socialist] Left,” according to a June 16 article in the Daily Mail.  The article, authored by Jake Wallis Simons, has the headline:  “Super-rich socialists quaff champagne in Venezuelan country clubs while middle-class mothers scavenge for food in the gutter . . . even the dogs are starving.”

So let’s bring the storyline up to date. Over the last few weeks, the following information has come out about the present state of the FrancisEconomy of Venezuela:

  • Corpses EXPLODING in Venezuela’s morgues as cash-strapped Socialist country cannot afford to provide air conditioning (see here)
  • Hungry Venezuelans break into Caracas zoo and butcher a horse (see here)
  • Venezuela nationalizes non-existent diaper production (see here)
  • Venezuela Reaches the Final Stage of Socialism: No Toilet Paper (see here)
  • Venezuela: Chavista Says 35,000 Seeking Food Went to Colombia ‘for Fun’ (see here)

Or as one can say summing up the above: just another day in FrancisParadise!

But not all the news is bad news, The FrancisGovernment of Venezuela is saving the environment by turning off the air conditioners in the morgues. (see here) But I digress…

Now that your humble blogger has provided for you, dear reader a solid background as to the situation on the ground in the FrancisEconomy of Venezuela, we can pose the  following quesiton:

Who is responsible for this Venezuelan FrancisGarden of Eden?

 

Naturally, one needs to start at the top, namely Victor Chavez, Nicolas Maduro and the murderous Castro boys in Cuba. But they could not have done it alone. They must have had help.

And guess who one of the helpers was?

Once again, for emphasis:

Now, in April 2002, when Chávez was out of office for a couple of days, people heard Father Sosa proclaim that the grassroots “Christian” communities would defend the Revolution to death, that the “right-wing” [?] would see the strength of the Revolution…

So it turns out that Fr. Arturo Sosa Abascal and his Venezuelan FrancisJesuits were an integral part in this PROCESS that could be described as the “development of the FrancisEconomy in Venezuela.

And what were the consequences for Fr. Arturo Sosa’s  stemming from his involvement in this DISASTER of EPIC PROPORTIONS that he helped orchestrate in the FrancisEconomy of Venezuela?

Well, he was “elected” to be the Superior General of the Society of Jesus.

Which is actually good news!

And I don’t mean to minimize the suffering of the poor Venezuelan population mind you.

It is OBJECTIVELY GOOD NEWS in that: with leadership and the “intellectual wherewithal” and “prowess” of a Fr. Sosa, the Society of Jesus should move closer to the end of the PROCESS upon which the Jesuits set out in the early to mid 1960’s. And the end of that PROCESS is that figurative or imaginative place where forgotten things or people go, i.e. the trash heap of history. (see here)

Which coincidentally brings to mind another FrancisCardinal, one can say, the original FrancisCardinal who had a similar experience in his dioceses. This FrancisCardinal also created a MESS OF EPIC PROPORTION in his FrancisDiocese. The standard of measure for JUDGING the “success” of the Buenos Aires FrancisDiocese is the OBJECTIVE FACT that the seminary of the Buenos Aires Archdiocese, an Archdiocese that is comprised of over 3 million souls, ordained just 3 priests this year. (see here)

And for his efforts, this FrancisCardinal did a “one better” than the above described EPIC FAILURE, by OBJECTIVE STANDARDS AND MEASURE mind you, in the person of Fr. Sosa.

This EPIC FAILURE FrancisCardinal was “elected” to the See of St. Peter.

Where he is working his FrancisMagic at present.

Concluding, what is important to take away from the above is that no matter what the intentions of any individual, if the PROCESS is faulty, the end will be the TRASH HEAP.

And this rule holds for the US Presidential Election and his subsequent term in office as it does for the occupant of the See of St. Peter. Now the PROCESS can be a short one or a longer one. Yet the ultimate OUTCOME must be binary (zero/one). That binary outcome is either SUCCESS or FAILURE.

So when we see a situation where individuals who have a history of EPIC FAILURES under their belts, whether it’s Bergoglio and the situation in Argentina as superior of the Jesuits or the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Fr. Sosa and his Chavista revolution in Venezuela or Sick Hillary and her EPIC DISASTER in the Middle East just to name three, one thing is for certain. And that thing this is:

for them (and us unfortunately), it can’t end well.

But no matter what, it will end…

And that in and of itself is OBJECTIVELY GOOD NEWS!

Advertisements