, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Today we continue our coverage at the Flash Point of Globalism, namely the European project.

As we have identified in previous posts, this is objectively speaking the GROUND ZERO for the entire Globalist movement, even more so than the US. As I have been laying out in my recent posts, it is the pseudo-philosophy of post-modernism (cultural Marxism) combined with the German “soft power” funding policies, that are responsible for funding the corruption of vast areas of the Visibislium Omnium, areas from economic sectors of developing countries, to political discourse in the developed countries and down to the Catholic Church in South America and sub-Saharan Africa.

In today’s post from Mike Shedlock via the Zero Hedge blog, we get confirmation of the “buyer’s remorse” or cognitive dissonance setting in among the Globalist elites in Germany and France.  I am republishing the below post for CONTEXT purposes.

On another related note, notice that the former US president, one Barack Barry Soetoro Obama showed up in Milan Italy yesterday. There is no need to belabor the point of why he showed up at a “summit of food innovation” in Italy. My loyal reader would have picked up on the “why” immediately.

But just for any new readers, Italy and the upcoming election is the GROUND ZERO for the Globalists European project and eventual ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. If Italy decides to leave the Euro currency (return to a new Lira) and devalue, the German banking sector will become insolvent overnight. If the rest of the Euro zone countries (countries using the European currency) leave, the Germans will have to revert back to the Deutsche Mark. And the value of the Deutsche Mark is put at roughly 40% to 50% higher then its value in the Euro (which is a virtual basket of the national currencies). And if this happens, then this will increase the prices of German goods sold overseas (trade surplus) and cause havoc in the German government budget. And finally, the havoc created in the German government budget will have downstream effects on such “soft power” policies like subsidizing food in Africa, subsidizing the heretics in the Latin American Church and impacting the collection of the notorious KIRCHENSTEUER taxes that directly impact the Holy See’s contributions made pursuant to Canon 1271 of the Code of Canon Law.

Simply put, by Germany reverting to its national currency, at its fair market value is equivalent as saying that Germany is reverting to its former status as the sick man of Europe.

So that is the CONTEXT.

Below the Zero Hedge post that can be found here.

“Zumutungen!” Buyer’s Remorse In France, Impossible Situation For Germany

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Now that the cheering over the French election has died down, reality will strike France and Germany like a cold bucket of water thrown in one’s face on a Winter’s day.

Germany was guaranteed to not like the result no matter who won. The final choice was between an anti-EU Marine Le Pen and a budget-comingling Emanuel Macron who needs EU treaty changes to get what he wants.

And in France, buyer’s remorse has set in. Unions are already protesting against Emmanuel Macron’s policies.


The word of the day is Zumutungen. Google translates that from German as “impositions” but the actual meaning is quite a bit stronger according to Eurointelligence.

The German political establishment clearly favored Emmanuel Macron over Marine Le Pen during the election campaign, but they are nervous about Macron’s eurozone agenda. As FAZ notes this morning, the relief over his victory still weighs heavier than the reality – which is that Macron and Angela Merkel have diametrically opposed views on the future of the eurozone. Merkel yesterday confirmed her readiness to engage in a dialogue with Macron, but said that eurozone bonds are a no-go. And without Eurobonds – or other forms of a eurozone-level fiscal backstop – none of the Macron agenda would work.

The FAZ article uses a word for which there is no straight translation – “Zumutungen” – which means an excessive and immoral demand that one can conceivably not fulfil. The paper makes the point that François Hollande also favoured the same kinds of reforms, but let go when he realized that there was no support from Berlin. The article notes that Macron’s ideas go way beyond those of Hollande. His eurozone agenda is not about crisis resolution, but economic shock absorption in general, as evidenced by his ideas for a pan-European unemployment insurance. FAZ is appalled by all of this, as well as by Macron’s idea of a Buy-European act. The paper noted that the eurozone finance ministers, at their meeting in Malta, criticised similar ideas by the European Commission.

On day one after Macron’s election, there is a first taste of resistance in the form of street protests against his labor law reforms. Labor reforms have been a particularly traumatic experience for the outgoing government. The radical trade unionists are taking to the streets, while the more cautious headquarters warn against implementing the whole agenda.

Volcanic Forces on Germany

Telegraph writer Ambrose-Evans-Pritchard accurately states Volcanic Macron Forces Germany to Come Clean on its Real EU Agenda.

Emmanuel Macron’s lightning conquest of France has put Germany in an awkward spot. French voters have picked an apostle of Europe and an arch-defender of the Franco-German axis. While this is welcomed with jubilation by some in Berlin, it raises thorny questions that others would prefer left unanswered.

He plans Nordic labor reforms, easier collective bargaining rules, and the sort of tax shake-up that German leaders have long demanded. The quid pro quo is that Berlin must agree to eurozone fiscal union, and cut its corrosive current account surplus – now 8.6 percent of GDP and in breach of EU rules.

“If France is not reformed, we will not be able to regain the confidence of the Germans,” Mr. Macron told Ouest-France. “After that, Germany must ask whether its own situation is tenable. It is accumulating surpluses which are neither good for its own economy nor for the eurozone.”

He wants a eurozone finance minister and budget, with joint debt, and a banking union with shared deposit insurance, all legitimized by a new parliament for the currency bloc. It implies a unitary eurozone superstate.

This calls Berlin’s bluff. The German elites often argue that they cannot accept such radical proposals as long as other eurozone states scoff at budget rules and fail to put their house in order.

The Handelsblatt accused Mr. Macron of “Teuton-bashing” over the trade surplus. The German Council of Economic Experts holds defiantly to the national view that trade surpluses are proof of virtue. It sees EMU debt-pooling as a slippery slope towards a “Transferunion”.

Mr. Macron’s plans would require a new EU Treaty, opening a can of worms that several states are determined to avoid. Berlin has no intention of sharing Italy’s debts, whatever France does.

Germany’s top court says EMU fiscal union and debt-pooling would require a change to country’s constitution. “Politically, that is absolutely impossible,” said Heiner Flassbeck, former economy minister and now at Hamburg University.

France is split on deep lines cleavage, Balkanized five ways. The scale of Mr. Macron’s 66:34 victory on Sunday is misleading. Blank protest votes – “Neither Plague nor Cholera” – jumped threefold to 11.5pc. The abstention rate jumped six points to 25.4pc.

The Front National’s Marine Le Pen botched the final weeks of her campaign with confused messages over pensions and the French franc, but she still won 34 percent of the vote. Five years ago this would have been deemed impossible. We now shrug off earthquakes a little too lightly.

German Elections

Angela Merkel has recently surged in the polls vs. SPD candidate Martin Schulz.

Is there a fundamental reason for the shift?

Yes, Schulz is far more open to Macron’s views than is Angela Merkel. Despite the fact a majority of German citizens do not want Merkel, voters may be stuck with her as a counterbalance to more radical ideas that SPD may be willing to try.

Germany a Loser

I discussed much of this setup long ago, before the French primaries, on January 15, in Germany a Loser No Matter Who Wins?

Germany a Loser No Matter Who Wins?

  • Le Pen: Eurosceptic – Seeks better relations with Russia
  • Macron: Pro Europe but seeks a common eurozone budget for investment and financial assistance in case of shocks.
  • Mélenchon: A socialist who will not be in favor of reforms France desperately needs
  • Valls: After the 2016 Nice attack, he was booed for saying that “France will have to live with terrorism.”
  • Fillon: Fillon aims to reduce the public sector and cut 500,000 civil-service jobs.  He wants the state healthcare program (securité sociale) to work better with fewer payments. Fillon is in favor of increasing the retirement age to 65. He seeks better relations with Russia.

Of the five, Germany could work best with Fillon. But his pro-Russia stance poses at least a minor problem.

O Come, O Come Emmanuel

I ask again, Is Macron the Anti-Trump, European Obama Savior?