Tags
Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
Something quite interesting is taking place within the Catholic Church and the wider society at large. This ‘something’ has a very Catholic flavor to it and can be seen in various sub-sets of what we call the Visibilium Omnium.
As to what that ‘something’ is, is hard to name at present. Yet this ‘something’ definitely has a Thomistic feel to it. So let’s look at some OCCURRENCES and try to identify their Thomistic ROOTS.
I will start with the GREAT Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre… or rather his “spirit”, who appears to be making a comeback in the strangest of places.
One place where it would not be unusual for the “spirit” of Arch. Lefebvre to be making a comeback, would be on a blog that is named: the RadTrad Thomist. Over on this blog, a post appeared titled: As if Modernism Mattered: Archbishop Lefebvre on the Infiltration of Modernism in the Institutional Organization of the Catholic Church.
This rather long post contains sections of transcripts of a speech given by the Great Archbishop back in 1982. It is highly recommended that all my loyal readers go to the website of the RadTrad Thomist and read this material. But I digress…
Now this post appears to have made a jump from a Thomist blog, dare I say one with a “Lefebvrist drift”, over to the mainline OnePeterFive blog. In a post titled Archbishop Lefebvre’s Eyewitness Testimony to the Church Revolution, the author, Maike Hickson adds here observations to those made by Dr. Chojnowski in the source post at the RadTrad Thomist.
Next, this same source post lept over to the the even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog. In a post titled Eyewitness account of struggle over post-Conciliar liturgical reform, which “reversed” centuries, Fr. Z adds his observations to those already made by Dr. Chojnowski and Mrs. Hickson.
And lastly, all this activity generated by one post was also noticed by the Jonathan Byrd at the Traditional Catholic Priest blog. In a short post titled Modernism, The Church And Archbishop Lefebvre, the following can be read:
I was reading a blog post from Dr. Chojnowski which was cited from 1Peter5 and cited from Fr. Z’s blog that I thought was wonderful.
Its a long read but very much worth the effort. If you have never studied much concerning the Archbishop nor the times in which the counsel came about, it will greatly open your eyes.
Check it out: The Infiltration of Modernism In The Church
So not including this post that your humble blogger is writing, there now appear, in a very short space of time, four posts on Catholic blogs citing ONE 1982 Archbishop Lefebvre speech.
FOUR!
So why do I mention this?
Over at The Remnant website, and also picked up by Vox Cantoris (Mean Old Bloggers), is a post written by Elizabeth Yore. In that post, Mrs. Yore writes the following:
In a separate interview about his La Civilita Cattolica article, Spadaro, S.J. reveals the underlying political motivation behind the Vatican “ecumenism of hate” rant:
“But certainly, we see the multiplication of websites, blogs, and Twitter accounts that tend to move public opinionand react in lively and often in a violent and fundamentalist way. These realities create a bubble within themselves…It is found everywhere. I do not say it is a majority phenomenon, but it is something that is present in the life of the People of God today.”
Apparently, traditional Catholic bloggers have gotten under Francis’ thin skin. The underlying cause of the Pope’s angst is that the conservative Catholic bloggers and websites are making their voice heard by daring to promote the Catholic faith and exposing the papal plots and diabolical alliances. Fr. Spadaro, Francis’ close confidante, is alarmed at traditionalists on the Internet because they tend to move public opinion. Horrors!
Francis, the Merciful, Inc. is distraught over its declining papal popularity poll numbers and blames the conservative blogosphere.
Yes, this Soap Bubble Papacy™ is all about the polls!
But I digress…
So what we see in the above is what your humble blogger has been drawing your attention to recently, i.e. what is commonly referred to as the Overton Window. (see here)
What is happening is that the Faithful blogs are attacking what can be termed as the post-conciliar Overton Window. It can also be referred to as the post-conciliar echo-chamber or the post-conciliar bubble.
Once again, the definition of the Overton Window (echo-chamber, bubble) is as follows:
The Overton Window is a concept in political sociology referring to the range of acceptable opinions that can be held by respectable people. “Respectable” of course means that the subject can be integrated with polite society. Respectability is a strong precondition on the ability to have open influence in the mainstream.
So what makes the above original posting of the Great Archbishop’s speech by Dr. Chojnowski significant is that it has expanded the Overton Window, or in this case the “post-conciliar bubble”, of what constitutes “acceptable opinion” from the Lefebvrist blogs (RadTrad Thomist) onto the conservative blogs (OnePeterFive), then onto the cross over blogs (Fr. Z.) and finally…
squarely onto the Spadaro/Martin/Rosica/Francis living room coffee table.
Closing, what is of critical importance to notice is that Thomism and Catholicism are making a strong comeback.
It is also fair to say that the “well” of solid Catholicism has become so bare that the mainline Catholics are reaching over into what would have been unheard of just 4 short years ago, i.e. the writings and speeches of Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX, in order to shore up their argumentation against the destruction of the post-conciliar Institutional Church.
And finally, it also needs to be mentioned that the reason that Archbishop Lefebvre is making such a strong comeback is due to his faithfulness to the doctrines of the Catholic Church and specifically to the doctrines as laid out by St. Thomas Aquinas.
And it’s not just the Catholics…
This wider “Lefebvrist drift” can be seen spreading in other areas of human activities!
I will leave off with one recent example that I came across. In the below video, one can observe a nominal Christian explaining how Dr. Jordan Peterson’s work (very Thomistic at its ROOT and in its nature) can be understood within a Christian CONTEXT.
PS If the author of the video had a better understanding of Thomism, specifically Natural Law, he could have done a much better job.
Maggie said:
I recall that the Franciscans of the Immaculate (none seem to have gone to the SSPX or we would have heard about it) was persecuted and put under hostile commissioners for their supposed “Lefebvrite drift”… Modernist Vatican has made overtures to the SSPX but I think only to gain a possible control because really those powers that be hate tradition and true Church teachings.
LikeLike
Fr. Richard said:
I’m a priest. Most of my priesthood (40+ years) I celebrated the NO. Then in “late middle age” I was given the grace of learning the uses antiquior. Now I celebrate the NO most of the time, due to my assignment, and the UA when I can. I wish I could reverse that and celebrate the UA every day and the NO when really needed.
Celebrating the UA leads to love it and then to study the completeness of the faith which is at its root. What a blessing! However, also distressing, as one sees how watered down or dumbed down much of our (mine included) preaching and teaching has been. In any case I’m discovering untold riches and am greatly blessed even with all my gray hair!
All that said, looking at the current state of the Church, divided and confused, how often I have thought, “Archbishop Lefebvre was right.” I’m currently rereading the biography by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais.
The 1982 talk is great. The problems we now see flourishing under Pope Francis are not all his doing. He’s reaping the results of years of mis-direction, “infiltration”.
How is the status of SSPX characterized today after the faculties granted by Pope Francis? Are they in “impeded” communion. I’m not sure of the exact term. In any case, if I were to be honest, I too am in impeded communion with Pope Francis. I don’t like that and I pray for him daily.
No wonder that there is renewed interest in Archbishop Lefebvre. I could see that coming the first time I read his biography back in the early days of Pope Francis.
LikeLike
RCAVictor said:
Dear Father Richard,
Here’s a metaphysical question for you: is the NO ever “really needed,” since it destroys the Catholic Faith and leads souls into apostasy?
May I suggest that the answer to that question is the reason why the SSPX insists that there is no Sunday obligation to attend a NO?
The NO is the instrument of the Communist/Freemason-inspired “pseudo-religion” that Bella Dodd warned about, 10 years before it happened. In short, we really don’t need to have the Third Secret revealed on this one topic (the rumored “evil Council”), because an ex-Communist, intimately familiar with the plans of the Communists who had risen in the ranks of the Church, told us 10 years before that Council that “in a few years you will not recognize the Catholic Church.”
May I also suggest you get in touch with the priests here: https://www.ourladyoflourdes.info/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fr. Richard said:
Thank you, RCA. Do you have any links you can list on Bella Didd. I’ve heard her name from Archbishop Sheen and others. I’d like to read more. Thanks also for the link to OL of Lourdes.
LikeLike
RCAVictor said:
Dear Father,
Check the November 2000 issue of the Christian Order website: http://christianorder.com/contents.html You will find a long quote from Bella Dodd which begins with this:
Speaking as a former high ranking official of the American Communist Party, Mrs. [Bella] Dodd said: “In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within.” The idea was for these men to be ordained and progress to positions of influence and authority as Monsignors and Bishops. A dozen years before Vatican II she stated that: “Right now they are in the highest places in the Church” — where they were working to bring about change in order to weaken the Church’s effectiveness against Communism. She also said that these changes would be so drastic that “you will not recognise the Catholic Church.”
I will post the second para. in a separate reply, it might be too long for one post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
RCAVictor said:
Father,
Here is the second para. of that Bella Dodd quote:
“The whole idea was to destroy, not the institution of the Church, but rather the Faith of the people, and even use the institution of the Church, if possible, to destroy the Faith through the promotion of a pseudo-religion: something that resembled Catholicism but was not the real thing. Once the Faith was destroyed, she explained that there would be a guilt complex introduced into the Church…. to label the ‘Church of the past’ as being oppressive, authoritarian, full of prejudices, arrogant in claiming to be the sole possessor of truth, and responsible for the divisions of religious bodies throughout the centuries. This would be necessary in order to shame Church leaders into an ‘openness to the world,’ and to a more flexible attitude toward all religions and philosophies. The Communists would then exploit this openness in order to undermine the Church.”
I recently wrote a 2-part article about this for the Catholic Truth Scotland website – which for some reason won’t load at the moment. Will try again tomorrow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Dowd said:
Please also note Bella Dodd biography on this subject as well as
‘Aa-1025: The Memoirs of a Communist’s infiltration in to the Church’. Paperback – May 1, 1972 by Marie Carre (Author)
LikeLike
Fr. Richard said:
Thanks so much. I’m on to reading it.
LikeLike
Michael Dowd said:
RCA Victor–I agree with you. When the NO Mass first appeared my wife in her analysis of it thought it was invalid or parts of it were invalid.
LikeLike
Pingback: Canon212 Update: Faithful Catholics Don’t Owe WeigelChurch a Thing – The Stumbling Block
Michael Dowd said:
Here is the comment I made on the One Peter 5 article about the GREAT Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:
Based on all of the above–the Catholic Church placed in the hands of the devil at Vatican II– what reason do we have for not joining SSPX immediately?
Suggested reading: ‘Open Letter to Confused Catholics’ by Archbishop Lefebvre, Angelus Press, 1987
LikeLiked by 3 people
S. Armaticus said:
The Great Archbishop is MAINSTREAM. 😉
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ana Milan (@ana_milan999) said:
“what reason do we have for not joining SSPX immediately?” The simple answer is the dearth of SSPX churches due to lack of faculties from NO Bishops who use their ‘illicit’ status against them. FSSP & Christ the King fare better because they have made an agreement with Rome & therefore are not considered illicit but building & maintaining the amount of churches necessary would be way beyond their capability. The NO Bishops have the Catholic laity in a noose!
The CC will one day return to Tradition but it will come after Russia is converted. Our Lady has promised that the Pope & Bishops of the world will consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart but it will be late.
LikeLiked by 2 people
S. Armaticus said:
What I think is happening is that the artificial “illicit” argument is losing its luster.
SSPX functions under extraordinary jurisdiction. Francis has confirmed this by confirming that the SSPX has the right to hear Confession.
What is happening now is that the Conservative and Trads in NUChurch are moving to the SSPX position.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the extraordinary supplied jurisdiction questions starts getting much more play in the mainstream Catholic press/blogs
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
Ana–
Seems to me that if an SSPX parish is relatively close and the local Novus Ordo parish is bad then the easy (for me) decision would be to go to the SSPX parish.
LikeLiked by 1 person