Tags
chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Refugee Resettlement Watch blog, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s Ann Corcoran, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
I have been traveling lately, so today will be a quick one.. But an interesting one…
But that is for you dear reader to decide.
Today we talk about MONEY. And POWER.
To be more specific, today start off by talking about MONEY at the “intersectionality” of neo-Modernism and post-Modernism.
We begin with our very own Cardinal Timothy Dolan. In a homily he gave recently at the USCCB in Baltimore, Cardinal Dolan made a defense of the Papal Encyclical Humanae Vitae (HV) and he stated the following: (see here) (emphasis added)
There’s “no question” that the late pope’s (Pope Paul VI) prediction that “a widespread contraceptive mentality would lead to ‘marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards’” has come true, said Dolan.
Little did our Cardinal know, or maybe not…, that right after his defense of HV, we would get this information from the bowels of the Ricca Hostel, i.e. the Casa Sanctae Marthae: (see here)
Pope Francis’ emphasis on “mercy” over “law” allows him to view a “second marriage” after a first valid marriage in such a way that it is not “characterized continuously as adultery,” suggested a Catholic priest and seminary professor in an article recently published in the Vatican’s official newspaper L’Osservatore Romano.
So what we are witnessing here dear reader, is that if you don’t like what the law says, change the meaning of the words.
A very “fluid” approach, if I do say so myself.
And yes, we are OBSERVING post-Modernism in its ESSENCE. Words have no objective meanings, so change the words and 2+2 can equal 5. Or whatever you want them to mean.
Next, given that 2+2 can equal 5, we get the following:
Pope Francis on Thursday rebuked those who deny the science behind global warming and urged negotiators at climate talks in Germany to avoid falling prey to such “perverse attitudes” and instead accelerate efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions. (see here)
So what we see here is that objectively real scientific dialogue is “perverse”. Which would infer that those who do not share ScientistBergoglio’s ClimateTheology are “perverts”. As Tantumblogo correctly observes. So we see that the current bishop of Rome just redefined this term likewise.
Using this line of reasoning, a “pervert” can be identified as… wait for it… “having children”.
Don’t believe me?
Over on the Life Site News blog, we get this beaut..:
Having many children is “wrong, or at least morally suspect,” an ethicist wrote in an article for NBC about the impact of family size on the environment. (see here)
So your asking yourself dear reader, especially if you are new to this blog, what does NBC have to do with the Holy See? Here is that link:
This became patently clear at a Pontifical Academy for Sciences seminar last week when a key speaker said “it’s a little ambitious” to think we can cut the population in half by 2050, but it is “smarter” to cull the number of people first, thereby making the move to renewable energy easier. (see here)
See how the circle closes?
We are seeing a call for the “culling” of human beings here folks. That word IS NOT being arbitrarily used.
Understanding the above, one can then “discern” the proper CONTEXT of the USCCB’s vote in the election to name the new head of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities.
Furthermore, this vote was taken in the presence of a Vatican dignitary (see here)
One can even go as far as saying a “campaigning Vatican dignitary”.
But back to Baltimore…
In that vote on the head of the Pro-Life Committee, the USCCB … whacked Francis upside his head.
What the USCCB did is put the kabash on the entire TeamFrancis AGENDA. It gave Francis a massive black eye, and they did it in the presence of the Papabile who is considered to be in pole position at the next conclave.
He is another poignant observation:
“Not to put too fine a point on it, but this amounted to the bishops giving the middle finger to Pope Francis.” (see here)
What is interesting to note is that this is a fight within our neo-Modernist/post-Modernist framework.
We see the neo-Modernist Card. Dolan and the majority of the USCCB up against the post-Modernist Francis cabal, as represented by the FrancisCardinal Blase “Francis pulls a rabbit out of his hat” Cupich.
Behind Cupich is the FrancisVatican, which is in ESSENCE a front for the German governmental soft power as projected through the KIRCHENSTEUR -> German Bishops’ Conference on the one side., while on the other side is the German government soft power through the NGO’s -> George Soros fronts -> UN organizations.
And at the end of both these channels of German soft power is GELD.
Or to you and me: MONEY.
And that money is needed to keep the FrancisChurch living in the lap of luxury as we can see here.
Nota bene: Whatever did happen to that dossier?
In the case of the USCCB, what we have is no such steady source of funding as in the case of the German Bishops’ Conference and their proxy FrancisChurch/FrancisVatican. The USCCB are cleaning up presently through their “human trafficking” activities, but as we see, the Trump Administration is working the cut off those funds. (see here)
Cardinal Dolan and a number of the other US ordinaries, realize that much of his funding also comes via their cozy relationship with the homosexualists. (see here) This is the reason that these ordinaries tolerate this state of affairs. Yet they also realize that each party is using each other like the proverbial cheap condom. Once either of the two parties gets what they are after, the “partner” will be disposed of.
And to be honest, these ordinaries really have no choice. With their dwindling numbers of pew sitters, who are either dying off or are withholding their support, since they see where the sectarian, humanist, anthropocentric neo-Modernism has led. And from what I hear, there are a lot of these folks.
So the Catholic Bishops in these here United States have come to the realization that they are in a catch 22 situation. They are trying to hold onto the human trafficking funding, quietly appease the homosexualists, while at the same time trying to stop the atrophying of their conservative and neo-conservative funding source.
And it is this latter source of funding that is represented by the Catholic Pro-Life Movement.
Let that sink in for a second or two…
Concluding, this is the primary reason behind the election of Archbishop Naumann of Kansas City as the head of the Pro-Life Committee and the defense of the neo-Modernist Humanae Vitae “document”.
Your humble blogger suspects that the USCCB has come to realize that it is not through the culling of His creationg, but rather through the culling of the FrancisBishops, from the various leadership positions at the USCCB, as was done at the conference in Baltimore, that the Bishops could keep the USS Barque of St. Peter financially afloat and hold out for better times.
If my hunch is correct, for the PRO-LIFE Movement, they have received a massive SIGNAL as to how strong they in fact really are within the US Institutional Church. To be more precise, how important the US Bishops see them being. The USCCB showed their hand, and their hand reads as follows:
Pro-Life Movement > FrancisChurch.
If the Pro-Life Movement leaders were smart, they should act on this immediately, and leverage this strength into positions of authority not only at the USCCB level, but also in the diocesan chancelleries and parish administrations.
It appears as if their time has come…
And the Restoration is right behind them. (see here and here and here and here … o heck, the entire New Liturgical Movement is for all intents and purposes should change its name to the Restoration Movement– see here.)
Nota bene: Wonder what the DavosPope thought when he was witnessing all this?
Would have loved to be the fly on that wall…
However you care to look at this, I find it insulting. After 50 years of receiving stones instead of bread, I am now supposed to believe that they have turned over a new leaf and are now all on board the SS Prolife? How about all the other pseudo-Catholic updates they have dished out to us, i.e., communion in the hand, altar girls, etc. It would be like going back to an abusive relationship. No thanks. They get my prayers for their conversion but no money and no thanks.
LikeLike
Exactly Wanda.
We need to starve the beast.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>If the Pro-Life Movement leaders were smart, they should act on this immediately, and leverage this strength into positions of authority not only at the USCCB level, but also in the diocesan chancelleries and parish administrations.
This.
The Life Movement is an umbrella, its stated goal is obvious and clear, the zeal of many rightwing Christian groups is being harnessed, both sexes as well. Big recruitment. Of course there a sense of immediacy that gets to people and its easier to sell that arguing against a heresy like Religious Liberty and the moral imperative of Christ’s Kingship in society which tends to frighted cons that don’t want to appear ‘fundamentalist’.
When you have the world against you, including those that are nominally on your side (because $), you’ve gotta be rough to everyone and fight for every inch. There’s no place here for niceties. The PL Movement is clearly in opposition to establishment humanism and sodomite mafia if they don’t recognize the enemy within and start taking names instead of mixing with them, they’ll get infiltrated, gutted and turned into a revenue center.
The German prelates know Vatican likes their € and they leverage that for everything its worth.
The conservative anglosphere Catholic becomes ineffectual because of his addiction to the image of a respectable nice guy who gets to rub elbows with worldly prelates, believes Novus Ordo and Roman Rite can coexist if only they would ‘dialogue’ (like races), likes Churchill because he was a ‘gentleman’ or something (though in reality a drunkard war criminal), thinks WWII was good and won by the good guys because muh Jews or something and the Pacific War justified because Japanese are belligerent, imperialistic and unreasonable etc just drinks the WASP establishment cool-aid. Because the psychological pain of rejection is a very real thing (one psychologist likened it to a serious physical blow), pain-averse individuals willingly fool themselves to fit in. That’s why people apologize for non-PC statements they make in brief moments of clarity and honesty. Jewish radicals like Alinsky exploit this weakness in people. Cons counter this by saying to them, “Ok you’re religious, we’re religious, religious people are threatened so why not just hold hands against faggots and feminists”, and then you have a display of pluralism, liberal pandering ad nauseam that turns being an enemy of Christ into a badge of honour.
The good thing about Francis is that all these cons had to grow some teeth as he became just too much to swallow, we just couldn’t afford another conservative Pope and Providence seems to have allowed Francis for a reason.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very true.
Seeing as how you mentioned the Kingship of Christ, I have been thinking a lot about Quas Primas lately. The reason for it is that I have been attentively following the Jordan Peterson Biblical Series, and it appears to me that Dr. Peterson is essentially putting in place the Natural justification for the Kingship of Christ.
As to the supernatural, there is a brilliant treatment of this on the AKA Catholic blog. I digress…
If you get a chance, I would highly recommend you watch an episode or two. I would recommend the last one about Jacob’s ladder. At the very beginning, Dr. Peterson explains how Jesus’ reign stretches across the entire universe. And this is coming from a clinical psychologist.
Anyways, it could be that with the advancement of science (how Thomistic?) we could see that the development of our knowledge about God’s creation is leading His creation to Catholicism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>At the very beginning, Dr. Peterson explains how Jesus’ reign stretches across the entire universe. And this is coming from a clinical psychologist.
>If you get a chance, I would highly recommend you watch an episode or two.
Will do.
LikeLike
I am going through them all.
I am amazed how much reconciliation between real science and Catholicism (as defined in CCC) has ensued over the last 50 years.
Looking at what Francis is doing with the Church’s science and family institutions, it appears as if that which they are promoting is already obsolete. If they just left them alone, those institutions would be on the cutting edge.
FrancisChurch is not aging well…
LikeLike
“In that vote on the head of the Pro-Life Committee, the USCCB … whacked Francis upside his head.
“He is another poignant observation:
“Not to put too fine a point on it, but this amounted to the bishops giving the (deleted)…to Pope Francis.”
=================================================
I erased the vulgar term employed against the Vicar of Christ, His Holiness Pope Francis.
It is unbelievable that a Catholic would speak in such nasty, vulgar fashion…but to speak about the Vicar of Christ in such nasty fashion…Pope Francis was “whacked upside his head.”…
…as well as such vulgar fashion…”the bishops giving the (deleted)…to Pope Francis” is beyond belief.
A follower of Jesus Christ does not speak in such fashion.
The Blessed Virgin Mary would never employ such unfortunate language. Saint Joseph would never employ such language.
Pope Francis is a child of God. We are called as Catholics to see the image of Jesus Christ in each human being.
A follower of God would not employ nasty, vulgar language against a child of God.
However, Satan is delighted by such language.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
LikeLike
I don’t like vulgarity either… especially like the below.
http://popefrancisbookofinsults.blogspot.co.uk/
LikeLike
Pingback: Canon212 Update: Publicly Proclaim Fidelity to the Roman Pontiff, Get Double ExcommuniFrancisCated – The Stumbling Block
See what you’ve done to me?
“note bene” should = nota bene.
LikeLike
Look, I really enjoy your blogs, but why do you insist on using words and phrases that you can’t spell–and don’t bother looking them up? Here are two from today’s blog:
“kabash” should = kibosh.
“note bene” should = note bene.
LikeLike
Wow, we are doing grammer now…
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
Too little, too late for NovusOrdoland. The next step by Francis will be to squash the FSSP and other regularized traditionalists. The only refuge will be SSPX.
LikeLike
It’s never too late…
LikeLike
Wonder what the DavosPope thought when he was witnessing all this?
He can only be ‘boiling with rage’ as Edward Pentin put it some time ago.
LikeLike
Hi:
I don’t think so. Parolin is a player. He needs support from the US Cardinals in the next conclave, even if there are only a few who are not in the pocket of the Germans.
So he actually comes back stronger, since he transcends the Francis/USCCB spat…
LikeLike
Let’s not get carried away quite yet. The vote was close with a 6 vote margin with 34 abstentions. Hardly a vote to be confident about. But reducing contributions is, for sure, the kind of signal we can all send.
LikeLike
This is indeed a good development. But let’s not get carried away. PF need only appoint 8 more Modernist or Post-Modernist bishops to have a working majority in the USCCB, to which he plans to give full doctrinal authority and the authority to rewrite the liturgy. The Cupich bullet was dodged by a slim margin.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m looking at this through a post-Modernists/neo-Marxist power paradigm. It appears to me that the Bishops’ sent a SIGNAL (signalling effect), whether it was intentional or not.
There must have beena reason why Cd. Dolan defends HV and at the same time, they break precedent and elect a Catholic Bishop over a FrancisCardinal for the Pro Life committee.
It signals that the Bishops recognize, again whether conscious or not, that the Pro Life part (conservatives and neo-cons) is where their bread is buttered.
And if there was not a strong need to satisfy this sub-set of the US Church, they would not have done it.
That was my point…
LikeLiked by 2 people