Tags
#fakenarratives, #fakenews, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Refugee Resettlement Watch blog, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s Ann Corcoran, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
Today we pick up with the issue of Communion for the heretics, schismatics and… well… everyone.
For those who don’t think that this is where Francis, the current bishop of Rome is taking this “matter”,…. well,… no need to go there.
I don’t thing there are too many of these folks around.
Our jump off point is the always prescient author Louie Verrecchio and his excellent blog AKA Catholic. In a post titled COMING SOON: Universal norms for intercommunion, we get this assessment of the how Mr. V sees the timeline for this blasphemous FrancisUndertaking: (emphasis added)
In my previous post on this topic, I said that Bergoglio happens to be diabolically subtle enough to play the long game; that is, to bide his time until he believes that the moment is at hand to unveil the universal norm he desires.
Forget about the long game; as things stand today, all indications are that he is rather anxious to get this particular show on the road.
This humble blogger agrees.
And the reason being, that time is of the essence and it is of the utmost urgency for the blasphemous formal heretic Francis to move this PROCESS forward. And the reason for the urgency is that time is working against Francis and his cabal, as more and more Catholics and non-Catholics alike, are catching on to what it is that he is doing. (see HERE)
Speaking of PROCESS itself, as my dear and loyal readers know, this is a subject that is quite frequently mentioned on this blog. What’s more, the post-Modernist assault on language and the objective meaning of words and their common usage, that is highlighted on these pages is also frequently explained in terms of a PROCESS.
Over at Fr. Z’s blog, we get a great post explaining just this above. In the post titled How the Left wins, we get great passage written by PJ Media’s J. Christian Adams which reads as follows:
What do I mean by post-constitutional? There are couple of characteristics.
Law is used by those in power – often bureaucrats – to advance their ideological views through their power. Law is no longer a fixed, largely agreed upon principle. Instead it is becoming something elastic, subjective, defined by the latest best argument cooked up at Harvard Law School or Yale.
… and of the dying houses of the Society of Jesus and other heretical organizations subsisting on the post-conciliar church.
But once again, what is important is to identify the PROCESS.
And here is a post by Chris Jackson from The Remnant website to explain just this particular PROCESS.
The reason that identifying the PROCESS is so important, is that it allows us to identify the EXACT SAME PROCESS transpiring in other sub-sets of the Visibilium Omnium.
So just as Francis, the bishop of Rome is trying to tear down the boundaries between Catholics and heretics, schismatics and pagans as to who can receive the Holy Sacrament of Communion, the UNITED NATIONS is trying to tear down the boundaries between the different nations and ethnic groups.
Below is a rather long text from the Zero Hedge website (see here) that lays out the UN plan behind the current human trafficking operations that are part of this PROCESS, and are being funded by the UN (Member States) and how it will be sold to the populations of the developed countries.
Now notice that support for the human trafficking operations are also part of the Francis “magisterium”. Actually, one can say that human trafficking is an integral part of FrancisChurch.
More over, it is such an integral part of FrancisChurch that the Vatican number 2, our DavosPope Cardinal Parolin has decided to officially make an appearance at one of the UN human trafficking support groups, i.e. the Bilderberg Conference.Here is that story from our friends over at Novus Ordo Watch.
So concluding, and on a higher level, what we are seeing is a PROCESS through which the GLOBALISTS are trying to do away with all manner and forms of BOUNDARIES.
Whether they are the boundaries between nation states, Catholics and non-Catholics or even between biological males and females, it is all part and parcel of this brave new world that our new masters are preparing for us peasants.
Yet time is running out for their hare-brained schemes as the voters of Hungary, Poland, Great Britain, The United States, Italy and most recently Slovenia are rebelling.
Which makes it all the more urgent to fast-forward the PROCESS and hope that some of it sticks.
Well, the chances of this PROCESS sticking are not that great, but this your humble blogger will leave for a different post.
But for now, we observe the PROCESS and “discern” that what FRANCIS is telling us…
Mass-Migration Should Be Accepted By Western Nations, UN SecGen
Just a day after Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis rejected Angela Merkel’s “flexible system” plan for migration, letting Frontex become a European border police force that can act independently, exclaiming that protecting frontiers should be up to individual countries.
“The idea that Frontex will guard everything by itself is not realistic in the long term,” Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis told reporters when asked about her comments. “Individual states must guard that.”
As Reuters reports, the Czech Republic and other central and eastern EU members Hungary, Slovakia and Poland – known as the Visegrad group – have strongly opposed a quota system drawn up by the European Commission to redistribute asylum seekers around the bloc.
We are reminded of comments during a presentation earlier this year on the management of migration processes by António Guterres, the Secretary General of The United Nations, who proclaimed that UN member states should prepare for great migratory movements.
And this is not a joke: The UN, led by António Guterres, wants to manage and influence migration. All this, of course, is dressed up in pretty words about the need to provide humanitarian aid, and also justified by the benefits that resettlement of the population is to give to the economies of particular countries. However, in fact, this means only one thing: Europe and the entire Western World must prepare for the flood of Africans.
Currently, nearly 1.3 billion people live in Africa, and by the end of this century there will be 350% more, or 4.4 billion. It is obvious that the continent, whose inhabitants are not able to feed themselves, let alone achieve an adequate level of urbanization and industrialization, cannot cope with such a sharp demographic increase. The UN therefore came up with the idea of resettling Africans to Europe and highly developed countries on other continents.
At the end of 2016, just after his election as UN Secretary General, António Guterres said:
“We must convince Europeans that migration is inevitable and that multiethnic and multireligious societies create wealth”.
It can be assumed here that the goal set by the former UN commissioner for refugees (A. Gutters served this function from June to December 2015), is to promote migration, give it a legal framework and manage it globally.
The first major step towards formalization of this phenomenon was the creation of the “Making Migration Work for All” report, which says in no uncertain terms that nation-states are to cease to exist. The document says that migration would be beneficial to everyone. And it is beneficial… to migrants alone (who apart from being accommodated in apartments live on undeserved entitlements) rather than to the average European who has to work to make a living for himself and his family, pay for his home and, additionally, provide for millions more newcomers.
The position expressed by Gutters during the presentation of this report makes our hair stand on end.3) The analysis of the speech of the UN secretary implies a simple conclusion: migration will still be bigger, we (UN) will manage it, and you (Western countries and societies) have to adapt:
„The fundamental challenge is to maximize the benefits of this orderly, productive form of migration while stamping out the abuses and prejudice that make life hell for a minority of migrants.”
and:
„States need to strengthen the rule of law underpinning how they manage and protect migrants — for the benefit of their economies, their societies and migrants themselves.”
The propaganda statement that migration brings social and economic benefits has become so deeply rooted in the media and political rhetoric that some people have begun to believe in it. It is a pity that theses statements are not supported by any calculations or analyses.
„Migration is a positive global phenomenon. It powers economic growth, reduces inequalities, connects diverse societies and helps us ride the demographic waves of population growth and decline.”
According to a research conducted by the Hungarian Századvég foundation, mass migration is perceived by the citizens of all 28 European Union countries as a threat to the EU economy, the heritage of the member states and the presence of Third World aliens is believed to undermine security.
The vast majority, as many as 68%, are afraid of the inflow of migrants from North Africa. For 70% of the inhabitants of the Old Continent, the growing number of Muslims is a serious threat, while only 8% say that this issue is not a problem. Citizens of European countries are afraid of increased crime and subsequent terrorist attacks. More than half of the pollees think that immigrants come to Europe mainly for economic reasons, that is, they are attracted by a high level of social benefits. 57% of respondents believe that the influx of immigrants from Africa and the Middle East will change the culture of their country, and 73% state that financial support for migrants will be a serious burden on state budgets. 61% believe that the influx of people from the Third World will weaken the EU economy.
Negative processes accompanying the resettlement of people were, however, completely ignored by the UN and transferred to countries which are not able to cope with this phenomenon:
„Migration (…), which powers economic growth, reduces inequalities, connects diverse societies (…) remains poorly managed.”
and:
„The best way to end the stigma of illegality and abuse around migrants is, in fact, for Governments to put in place more legal pathways for migration.”
The report completely distorts the nature of threats to Western civilization, and also underestimates the importance of homogeneity, rejecting entirely the advantage that national states offer. The United Nations points out that shrinking populations is a danger for Europe, and Antonio Guterres suggests that the demographic collapse can be remedied by resettling the population surplus from Africa. By the end of this century, the number of indigenous Europeans will amount to fewer than a quarter of a billion, whereas there will be almost 4.4 billion Africans. The host society, according to the UN Secretary General, has no right to think that migrations are a negative phenomenon:
„It can be seen, too, in the political impact of public perception that wrongly sees migration as out of control. The consequences include increased mistrust and policies aimed more at stopping than facilitating human movement.”
Also, the International Migration Organization, which participated in the work on this report, states on its Twitter account that „Migration is inevitable, desirable and necessary”. The question arises: who wants migration and who thinks it is necessary? Certainly not the inhabitants of the countries to which the alleged refugees are streaming.
The report states that:
- migration is inevitable, therefore it must be properly organized and the UN provides guidance on how to manage it;
- nation states must adapt to the admission of migrants in accordance with the guidelines;
- the societies of developed countries must become accustomed to having their countries flooded with masses of migrants.
The powers that be are trying to convince us of the alleged benefits of mass migration and the resettlement of Africans into Europe. Reality contradicts wishful thinking. Increasingly, citizens of host countries are afraid to leave their homes not to mention that an increased part of their earnings, is used to provide for the newcomers. We have also come to the point where negation of positive aspects of migration is regarded as racism and xenophobia, and to the fact that if someone wants to live in a one-nation state, he is labelled as a nationalist, with the word being unjustifiably negatively charged.
A mass inflow of the so-called “refugees” on the Old Continent is not perceived by its inhabitants as a phenomenon that culturally enriches and will also have a positive impact on the economy. However, global organizations do not take this into account and enforce their own plan to create a nationally and religiously heterogeneous society, where tradition and cultural identity are not desirable.
António Guterres and the UN know better what is good for western nations, ignoring the data presented by many organizations, including the Gefira Foundation, which underline a number of negative phenomena caused by the mass flooding of Europe by Third World populations.
However, circling back to Czech PM Babis’ comments, he reminds the good UN SecGen that elections this weekend in Slovenia, won by an anti-immigration opposition party, and in Italy which yielded the EU’s first anti-establishment government, showed how the policy stance of Visegrad had spread.
“So, this opinion on migration will prevail in the whole of Europe, and we have to stop migration outside the European continent and help the people in Africa and Syria”, he said.
But then again – what does democracy matter anyway?
halina1954 said:
“Respect Immigrants, Pope insists,” Catholic World News, Jan. 15, 2006, reported that;
“Pope Benedict XVI asked the faithful to join in the fight against ‘discrimination, injustice and contempt.”
“Taking note of the 92nd World Day for Migrants and Refugees, the Holy Father said that Christians should be mindful of the difficulties that immigrants face in becoming assimilated in a new culture.”
“A sharply increased level of migration is ‘a sign of the times’ today, the pope said. Whether they leave their homes voluntarily or under duress, pursuing new opportunities or fleeing violence, immigrants deserve respectful and humane treatment, the pope said.”
And of course Pope Benedict is correct – in part. Catholics should always show mercy and extend charity to immigrants and refugees, legal or illegal, as fellow humans, as brothers and sisters in Christ.
BUT the pope is clearly WRONG if by his appeal he asks of Catholics or any other citizens to look the other way in the face of a massive immigration INVASION that threatens to BANKRUPT the country and thrust it into ANARCHY and TYRANNY.
There’s a huge difference between human compassion, on the one hand, and crime, treason and national suicide on the other.
AN INVASION FORCE MUST BE STOPPED; CITIZENS HAVE THE MORAL RIGHT – AND MORAL DUTY BEFORE GOD – TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THEIR FAMILIES, HOMES, COMMUNITIES AND SOVEREIGN NATION.
However, in the domain of public policy, except at the most local level, but definitely not at the national level, insofar as it would means falling into the hands of self-serving opportunists, ambitious and manipulative demagogues, greedy special interests, criminal politicians and diehard socialists in the service of the Elders of Zion who are ever on the prowl to exploit any opportunity to further their cause.
It’s a vicious cycle that never ends and only escalates in perpetuity……
…not my words, written by a dear friend…….
LikeLike
halina1954 said:
What is happening with ‘multiculturalism and massive invasion of immigrants’ in Europe, can very well be applied to the United States, since it began here.
….excerpt from Dr. E. Michael Jones, ‘Jewish Nazis,’ Culture Wars, April, 2011; “A bad fruit of subversive immigration, multiculturalism ‘has been a completely Jewish creation from start to finish. For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.” (clear as day today….my emphasis)
The only time Jews and their front-men fought against mass immigration into the U.S. was when the immigrants were Catholic.
The Catholic immigrants were subjected to a set policy to rob them of the faith in its integrity through a process called ‘assimilation,’ or ‘Americanization, which included ‘mandatory public schooling’, that preached a new ‘civil religion’ repudiating the one religion revealed to man by God. They were relentlessly pressured to become part of the ‘melting pot’ as yet another method of robbing them of their true Christian identity and their ties to Rome and the pope……were steadily steered away from traditional Catholicism (especially, after Second Vatican Council) in favor of a less Roman, more American…..liberal Catholicism. Modern, liberal and American Catholicism (which error incorporates a significant number of traditional Catholics) is staunchly anti-Catholic.
One of the main purposes of the Knights of Columbus, in fact, was to transform the faithful gravitating to these shores from Catholic Europe into full-fledged Americanists……as we can see today, legions, hardly more than Catholic in name only. (See Dr. Justin Walsh’s excellent 2 part piece on ‘The Knights of Columbus-Conduits of Patriotism and Heresy,’ The Angelus, July 2000).
The systematic fragmentation and wholesale discombobulation of Catholic ethnic communities – the Irish in Boston, the Italians and Poles in Chicago and New York, the Germans, Puerto Ricans and others…..who did nothing less then became productive citizens…..
There’s only one scholar and one book that addressed this crisis from a Catholic sociological point of view. He is E. Michael Jones; his book “The Slaughter of the Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing.”
The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived (Christian) peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965…….
Let us wonder no more, what has been happening in Europe since the Protestant Revolution in England, French Revolution in France, Russian Revolution, and American Revolution…..Civil War does not count for nothing…….The massive invasion of illegal aliens into Europe is deliberate and calculated to bring about Europe’s (Christendom’s) downfall……under the NOT watchful eyes of legions of lukewarm and worldly Catholics……Ave Maria!
LikeLiked by 1 person
halina1954 said:
….something to ponder about for all us Catholics: Christ’s prayer for His disciples…..
“I pray for them. I pray NOT for the world, but for them whom Thou hast given Me; because they are Thine…….And now I am not in the world and these are in the world, and I come to Thee. Holy Father, keep them in Thy name whom Thou hast given Me, that they (Catholics, true Christians) may be one, as We also are.”
Saint John 17-9-11.
We are our brother’s keepers….let us pray for all Catholics, especially!, lest the enemy will devour us…….Miserere!
LikeLiked by 1 person
halina1954 said:
The Catholic World Report for April 1993 featured an article titled ‘The Secret Plan,’ in which it revealed excerpts from a startling though little known document created in secret in 1974 by the U.S. National Security Council which called for a clandestine program aimed at dramatically limiting world population growth. The plan called for ‘urgent measures’ ‘to reduce fertility….(and) achieve a replacement level – a two-child family on the average…..This goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050.
Depopulation and the destruction of middle class Christians includes ‘mercy killing’ as well.
Steven Mosher of the Population Research Institute has long warned of the plotting of abortionists, including many ‘Catholic’ politicians such as Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi and others, for a ‘massive….abortion holocaust aimed at Catholic babies in Catholic countries……Planned Parenthood….the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA)….the Center for Reproductive Rights…..and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) are all teaming up to slaughter vast numbers of Catholic babies in the Catholic Latin American nations of…..Peru, Costa Rica, Honduras, Columbia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay, Guatemala, Chile, El Salvador, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina…..Europe not excluded.
Mandatory vaccines is another method of depopulating the world…..vaccines as an effective means of vastly reducing the world’s current population of about little less then 10 billion people
GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) bio-technologies (fast food)…..help depopulate by causing disease pandemics and vast shortages of edible (nutritious) foods that will lead to scores more dying of malnutrition and, after the collapse of society, widespread famine (yes, in America….it has long been planned….see Van Gorder’s ‘Ill Fares the Land: The Planned Famine for America’ and Texe Marrs’ ‘Days of Hunger, Days of Chaos: The Coming Great Food Shortages in America)……
and even a one-child policy and forced sterilizations are part of the same totalitarian push, and promoted by well respected billionaires.
May God grant us the grace, for the desire of ‘discernment!’
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
halina1954: Until Pope Francis, one could never have imagined that a Pope would be on-board with population control. All of this is what happens when faith in God ceases.
LikeLike
halina1954 said:
Michael, none of this is happening by accident, all of it brilliantly engineered by Satan and promoted by his legions of demonic and by human collaborators (poisoned Catholic hearts, especially).
A good example to understand the great evils we see in the ‘Church’ in the world today, as Holy Father Pope Leo XIII said, are ‘proceeding according to a plan’……..at Catholic expense, always at Catholic expense…….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wanda said:
The age-old objective was and is the destruction of Christendom, which essentially is the Church of Christ on earth. Anyone who has traveled to Europe, even recently, cannot help but note the overwhelming presence of Catholic culture, particularly those countries who remained Catholic after the Protestant revolution.. Outside of the stunning Cathedrals, there are Shrines and images of Our Lady and the Baby Jesus on buildings, Crucifixes on private properties and wayside shrines. This cannot be allowed to stand according to the globalists. At some point, it will either be worth dying for or not.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
Thanks Wanda. I am sure, to some extent, you are correct, even if the folks bent on the destruction of Catholicism are unaware of the reasons for their actions.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
There is a series of post that I am thinking about writing relating to “transmission mechanisms”.
Here are some early thoughts:
After the suppression of Thomism (classical philosophy) the Phenomenologists realized that their “new age” ideology just can’t carry the load through the generations. What they realiszed is that eventually, reason and Faith will reassert themselves.
So they decided on using art as the transition mechanism. This is why they needed to introduce Modern “sacred” art so as to break with the past. They aslo assumed that since Modern art will “change with the times”, it could keep their post-conciliar “culture based” ideology current through the future generations.
Needless to say this has been a massive failure, since art can in a sense sustain a culture, but it most certainly can’t sustain a Civilization. And they did not see post-Modernism (nihilism) as the end of the road of Modernism and neo-Modernism. (Post-conciliar church)
(Aside, and clinically speaking, leftists have problems with their amygdalas, i.e. the part of the brain that is responsible for risk assessment and foresightedness)
So what we are seeing now is that the post-Modernists (FrancisChurch) are taking an axe to the roots of the Civilization, so cultures don’t really matter since they need a Civilization to sustain them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
“So what we are seeing now is that the post-Modernists (FrancisChurch) are taking an axe to the roots of the Civilization, so cultures don’t really matter since they need a Civilization to sustain them.”
Well, taking an axe to Catholicism, for sure, which is the basis of Western civilization. This destruction as been going on now since Christ entered the world, got lots of impetus with Luther, and became an official position of the Catholic Church at Vatican II. We must be nearing the end of it all, as I see the Church becoming just a remnant of itself in the next 20 years or so. The suicide of the West is well underway.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
What I think is happening is that the “religious” iconography is being incorporated into society in order to secularize it.
What is playing out is a scenario where 100 years from now, when someone encounters say a figure of the Blessed Virgin on a building, their point of reference will be the latest Versace line of handbags.
This is what is no doubt behind the sacriligious New York fashion show that was sponsored by Card. Dolan and the Vatican.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Canon212 Update: Francis’ UnChristian Church of Slavery and Hate – The Stumbling Block
TLM said:
The globalization OWO plan is moving along, and although the ‘Universal Communion’ initiative seems to be at somewhat of a stand still for various reasons, there seems to be a few wrinkles that have to be ironed out first. In order for the Church to welcome anyone and everyone to the ‘table of unity’, we have to make our protestant brothers and sisters (and everyone else) much more comfortable with the idea. What better way to do that than to initiate an ‘Ecumenical Service’ between Catholics and Protestants (and others) that has been talked about for quite some time now that would eliminate the ‘Consecration’. What I call the ‘NON MASS MASS’. We haven’t heard much about this for a while now, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t working on something of this nature ‘behind the scenes’.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
What also needs to be considered is that “revenue sharing” arrangements. I don’t think those 35,000 different “Christian” denominations will want to share anything with the Vatican.
Which leaves only government and quasi government funding left, which is why FrancisChurch is turning itself into an NGO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Dowd said:
Seems to me other denominations will want in on the NGO scam. So, the “reward” for ditching Catholicism will not be as great as Pope Francis thinks.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
They are on the NGO train already…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Dowd said:
Oservations:
—-The question is whether homogenization of races, cultures, religions, and economies will or will not result in a better life for everyone. History would appear to say NO.
—-And if it is a good idea, can it be implemented without totalitarian means? Current experience also says NO on this question.
—-On what rational basis then are the EU and United Nations elites pushing this idea? What is behind this scheme?
LikeLike
David J Bromley said:
Such homogenization will not occur with massive population movements, anyway. Homogeneity is not the goal!
LikeLiked by 1 person
S. Armaticus said:
The goal is population control.
What I think we are dealing with are ideologues who think that the population needs to be control like we control the dear population in Wisconsin.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
What they mean by population control is less population via whatever works, e.g., abortion, euthanasia, starvation, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
S. Armaticus said:
Yes, these people are very limited in terms of their appreciation for human ingenuity.
When I run into one of these “over population” types is by mentioning to him that we need all the people we can get because it is just a matter of time before we start populating the cosmos.
Shuts them up pretty quickly. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jeff C. said:
Right
Here in Nebraska the rumor was that they were releasing mountain lions to bring down the deer population. I guess if it works on deer…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wanda said:
Not only that but geoengineering. As Fr. Malachi Martin told Suzanne Pearson in an interview, “Keep your eyes on the skies.”
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/20/us/washington-cougar-attack-leaves-mountain-biker-dead/index.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
S. Armaticus said:
I think we all know the answers to the above posed questions…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chris Benischek said:
The Roman Coliseum?
LikeLike
Chris Benischek said:
Roman Colosseum.
LikeLiked by 1 person