TeamFrancis Directs Catholics To Read Francis Through Derrida…

Tags

Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Lot happening folks, and I am getting ready to go on an extended vacation. Extended in my case means more than a long weekend. But I digress… The reason I am mentioning this is that I will be posting sporadically, at least until the 20th of August.

However, before I take off, I have posted some links in the right hand margin that can be viewed during my absence. These links should provide you dear reader, with a daily “fix” of reason, logic and objective reality, if the need arises.

Today’s post therefore, will be my last post before I leave. And I will leave off with what I think is the most important OCCURRENCE to have taken place since the beginning of the Francis bishopric of Rome.

Is this hyperbole?

Maybe.

But you dear reader will have to make up your mind for yourselves.

So here goes…

A few days ago, an article appeared written by our friend “Fr.” Antonio “2+2=5” Spadaro and a co-conspirator, a Presbyterian named Marcelo Figueroa, titled Evangelical Fundamentalism and Catholic Integralism in the USA: A surprising ecumenism. The article can be read here.

Moreover, a most excellent (or as a post-modernist can say: “excellentest”) response came from another favorite of this blog, in a positive sense this time, Maureen Mullarkey, titled In God They Don’t Trust: Anti-American Syllabus in Vatican journal. This article can be read here.

And finally, to understand why the two above mentioned articles constitute an OCCURRENCE being the most important since the start of the Francis bishopric of Rome, two concepts need to be understood.

The first of these concepts is one that your humble blogger explained in the post titled NUChurch Shocked… Shocked That Francis Lies…, namely the Overton Window. Here is that passage:

The Overton Window, also known as the window of discourse, is the range of ideas the public will accept…. The term is derived from its originator, Joseph P. Overton (1960–2003), a former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy….

Devers refines the definition:

The Overton Window is a concept in political sociology referring to the range of acceptable opinions that can be held by respectable people. “Respectable” of course means that the subject can be integrated with polite society. Respectability is a strong precondition on the ability to have open influence in the mainstream.

The second concept that needs to be understood here is that of the post- Modernist NARRATIVE. In a post titled The Soap Bubble Papacy™ : The Battle Is In Your Mind – Francis’ Gaslighting we explained that:

FAKE NEWS ≠ FALSE NEWS

An example from the POLITICAL sub-set of the Visibilium Omnium can be seen here:

Guess which one the FAKE NEWS MEDIA is focusing on?

Back to the subject at hand.

“Fake news” is in essence any news that contradicts or questions an “official” NARRATIVE. And the reason that real news is lethal to the post-Modernist is that it “corrupts” their FAKE NARRATIVE(S), i.e. it “corrupts” their corrupt information. Here is how the process works:

Just to sum up what we have defined above, what we are dealing with is information that is injected into the public domain that is CORRUPTED (FAKE NEWS / FrancisCoprophagia). The CORRUPTION is intended to create a FAKE NARRATIVE (Gas-lighting). The most likely explanation for why this FAKE NARRATIVE is created is to allow individuals/entities to act on this FAKE NARRATIVE. In other words, this FAKE NARRATIVE allows these individuals to act when they otherwise would not be able to act. I.e. it provides them with justification.

By understanding the above, we can now deconstruct the Spadaro/Figueroa article and the Mullarkey response. So here are some observations:

First, notice the emotional tone of the Spadaro/Figueroa article. The emotions, negative in this case, were no doubt brought about first by their observation that a “great deal” of the discussions in... let’s call it the affairs of the Catholic Church, (specifically in the blogo-sphere) are taking place outside of the FrancisChurch Overton Window.

In other words, the discussion i corrupting their NARRATIVE.

How to we know this?

In the last paragraph, the authors tell us outright that this is the case. Here is that passage:

This is why Francis is carrying forward a systematic counter-narration with respect to the narrative of fear. There is a need to fight against the manipulation of this season of anxiety and insecurity.

What the above tells us, the initiated, is that TeamFrancis think in terms of NARRATIVES and counter-NARRATIVES. Therefore Francis, through his proxies is admitting that he is in fact a post-Modernist. 

This is HISTORIC!

By extension, the significance of the above is that now Francis’ proxies have provided us with confirmation of the PROPER and CORRECT framework through which we can read Francis.

And it’s not Benedict, but rather Derrida.

But I digress…

And as my long time readers know, what defines a post-Modernist is a person who sees the world in terms of fractioned special interest (identity) groups, who in turn produce their foundational NARRATIVES, which then battle it out in a Hobbesian battlefield of identity groups. These identity groups do not dialogue, because the post-Modernists don’t believe in dialogue. Therefore, it is just one big struggle for POWER and the winning identity group, with their winning NARRATIVE, takes it all.

As for the rest of the unlucky identity groups and their NARRATIVES, they are subjugated. Hmmm…. where have I read that before? Why yes, here.

But just in case you dear readers need a refresher, here is Dr. Jordan Peterson to explain the post-Modernist mindset:

Now for the Mullarkey response. What is of critical significance in the Mullarkey response is that she names post-Modernism and by extension the Francis post-Modernists for what they are, and she names them in the third paragraph. Here is that passage:

On exhibit in this chosen opener is the post-modern denial of the existence of objective reality. The past’s own utterances are not steadfast. The truth of them, like that of any text, is unfixed, determined by current ideological needs.

Yes?

What we see therefore is that Mullarkey understands the foundational “philosophy” read ideology upon which the Francis proxies Spadaro/Figueroa constructed their document and criticises that document in its proper CONTEXT.

On a more general note, the significance of this OCCURRENCE is that the Mullarkey response is an example (the first that I have come across) where individual Catholic authors are beginning to use the proper philosophical/ideological “template” through which Francis must be read and understood.

If the above is more than just an isolate incident of a Catholic writer using the post-Modernist “template” to understand and explain the “product” produced by TeamFrancis, and other writers begin to reference the post-Modernist underlying ideology of this pseudo-intellectual gibberish, we will obtain a powerful weapon to counteract this rubbish and re-orient the collective Catholic thought process onto a footing based in OBJECTIVE REALITY.

And this in turn will be lethal not only for TeamFrancis and FrancisCurch in general, but also lethal to the post-concicliar sect that has taken over the Bride of Christ during this “new springtime of the ‘spirit’ of Vatican II”.

Leaving off before my vacation, I will end with another Jordan Peterson video on post-Modernism.

Enjoy!

 

 

The Soap Bubble Papacy™ – The Missing Crowds…

Tags

Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Today we stay off topic again, and return our attention to the 2016 US Presidential Election. As you dear reader will recall, one glaring anomaly that your humble blogger reported on quite regularly is what we called the FAKE POLLS. (see here and here and here just to mention 3)

What interested us back then was not the FAKE POLLS in and of themselves, but the fact that everybody knew that they were FAKE POLLS. Or at least should have known… Or maybe I should say that any rational individual with a modicum of intelligence and an iota of intellectual honesty should have known that these POLLS were FAKE. And if the above mentioned intellectually honest individual didn’t know before the Podesta emails (see here) came to light, they should have known afterward.

So why am I bringing this to your attention?

Well, we had another occurence of FAKE POLLS appear in the Georgia 6th Congressional District special election that was held this past Tuesday. The re-post from the Zero Hedge website below sets out the fact. (see original here) And it would appear as if these folks have learned nothing, as evidenced below.

The reason that this is important for us as Catholics is due to the proximity of… lets call them the main actors, in the WikiLeaks Podesta emails relating to FAKE POLLS and these same actor’s proximity to the “Catholic Spring” (see here) emails also released by WikiLeaks.

For those who are not familiar with the “Catholic Spring” issue, the background is that Mr. Postesta and his friends created front groups of purported “catholics” in order to create an uprising within the US Catholic Church in order to “re-order” its political priorities. You know, like the Catholic “obsession” with abortion. But I digress… More detail can be found here.

So to tie this information above and below into one tidy package, in January of this year, Pew came out with their survey data pertaining to the popularity of Francis, the bishop of Rome. What is important to note is that in one of the headlines, we can read that: Pope Francis’ popularity extends beyond Catholics. (see here) And there is evidence to support just this (check out the Unaffiliated column):

That is, provided that these polls are not FAKE POLLS.

And this is where the problems begin.

This past Sunday, Francis held the Corpus Domini (Corpus Christi) procession in Rome. He moved the Feast Day from its standard Thursday observance to Sunday in order to  “allow more people to participate in the traditional procession through Rome”.

And needless to say, it did not work as can be seen from the picture above.

What’s worse is that Francis didn’t even show up to the procession. (see here)

PS. The empty space in the middle is where the popes kneel during the procession.

Like here:

And everyone in Rome is talking about it!

But back to the subject at hand, i.e. the “popularity of Francis”. In the Pew Research post that asserted that Francis popularity extends beyond Catholics, which is an objective correct claim, we can read about how popular Francis is.

Yet in a New York Times (yes, that New York Times) piece, written a couple of months earlier, we can read the following: (see here)

But are Catholics actually coming back? In the United States, at least, it hasn’t happened. New survey findings from Georgetown’s Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate suggest that there has been no Francis effect — at least, no positive one. In 2008, 23 percent of American Catholics attended Mass each week. Eight years later, weekly Mass attendance has held steady or marginally declined, at 22 percent.

So what accounts for this “Francis popularity” that Pew Research is picking up, but is not translating into increased church attendance, not to mention the horrible Corpus Domini mass and procession attendance that we have witnessed this past Sunday?

Here is that explanation, once again as opined by the New York Times:

Francis has built his popularity at the expense of the church he leads. Those who wish to see a stronger church may have to wait for a different kind of pope. Instead of trying to soften the church’s teaching, such a man would need to speak of the way hard disciplines can lead to freedom. Confronting a hostile age with the strange claims of Catholic faith may not be popular, but over time it may prove more effective. Even Christ was met with the jeers of the crowd.

Oh my!

And finally, about the FAKE POLLS. There is an old saying about believing nothing that you read and only half of what you see, I think it would be a good piece of advice to use as guidance when reading about how popular Francis is.

When reading something like this here.

Besides, the missing crowds give the game away.

*****

Democrats, Stop With The Poll Rigging…It’s Getting Embarrassing

 by Tyler Durden

Last fall, in the months/weeks leading up to the presidential election, we spent a fair amount time talking about how Democratic pollsters were setting themselves up for a massive embarrassment on election day with their obviously rigged polling data that consistently suggested Hillary had a commanding lead.  In fact, just weeks before the election, the Washington Post published a poll showing that Hillary was well on her way to a ‘blowout’ 12-point victory (we wrote about it here:  This Is How WaPo’s Latest Poll Gave Hillary A 12 Point Advantage Over Trump).  Needless to say, that never happened and those pollsters suffered the humiliating consequences of their biased ‘math.’

Unfortunately, as last night’s special election in Georgia makes all too clear, no one on the left seems to have learned any lessons from their presidential poll rigging debacle last November.

In fact, one prominent pollster even declared just 6 days before the election that if Ossoff failed to win it would mean that “MATH IS DEAD AND DATA IS BROKEN.”

Of course, the problem isn’t that “math is dead” or “data is broken”…the problem is that rather than using data to arrive at a solution pollsters have resorted to starting out with a solution and then solving for the data.

Which is exactly what appears to have happened in Georgia.  As the following chart points out, with just 9 days left until election day, pollsters were predicting a fairly easy win for Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff in Georgia’s 6th district runoff…shocking, we know.  But, just over a week later, the Republican candidate ended up easily walking away with the win, and served up another embarrassment for pollsters in the process as actual results swung 8.6 points from predictions peddled to the public just a week earlier.

So how does this keep happening?  Well, it’s not that surprising in light of the fact that Democrats literally wrote a playbook on how to rig polling data through “oversamples.”  As we noted last October in a post entitled “New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through ‘Oversamples’“, it all apparently has a lot to do with “oversampling” various minority groups.

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations.  In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, microtargeting & polling projects
–  Over-sample Hispanics
–  Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
–  Over-sample the Native American population

For Florida, the report recommends “consistently monitoring” samples to makes sure they’re “not too old” and “has enough African American and Hispanic voters.”  Meanwhile, “independent” voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

–  Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
–  On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.

Of course, the intent of publishing these ridiculous polls is presumably to ‘chill’ the Republican vote…afterall, why go through the hassle of long lines at a polling station if your candidate has no shot at winning?

That said, the strategy only worked BEFORE the media and pollsters lost all credibility…so, why bother keeping up the charade?  As we mentioned above, it’s just getting embarrassing at this point.

Normalization Narratives And The Dubia Cardinals Poisoning The FrancisWell…

Tags

Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Today we go off theme, or rather go off the theme that your humble blogger was developing over the last few posts. Those posts dealt with an interdisciplinary attempt to form an understanding of where the post-conciliar church went wrong and to define a “cure” that would allow it to return to its mission, as defined by its Found namely: the salvation of souls.

So today, we will do a post on an aspect of a recent and presently developing story, which isn’t getting the attention that it deserves. The recent development is the letter sent by the Four Dubia Cardinals, requesting an encounter audience with the bishop or Rome, Francis.

The reason that this said aspect of the story isn’t getting the attention it deserves is that most of the Catholic blogo-sphere doesn’t quite grasp the post-Modernist mindset of the prevailing culture, especially the post-Modernist culture that is presently prevailing behind the Sacred Vatican Walls.

Just to refresh that which in fact constitutes the post-Modernist mindset. As we know, post-Modernists don’t believe in Truth. Everything is relative and all existing structures, whether they are physical (government, institutions, etc.) or immaterial (science, literature, language, etc.) can only be judged through the power dynamic.

Furthermore, there is no such thing as individuality, since all individuals belong to “identity groups” and it is these identity group that fight among each other to obtain power, for those specific groups and their group interests.

The manner in which these identity groups fight in this Hobbesian battlefield is through the use of NARRATIVES. Presently, that is… So what we have in fact are just individual NARRATIVES that are developed by special interest groups that are fighting other NARRATIVES developed by other special interest groups, in a social Darwinian death struggle for dominance.

Here is a more graphic representation of the above information.

Now for the Four Cardinal’s Audience Request (FCAR).

Into this above framework, we get a new piece of information, i.e. the Four Cardinal Audience Request (FCAR). So how do we properly interpret this FCAR in our post-Modernists post-conciliar church “intellectual” framework?

The starting point is that this FCAR appears to collide with the Francis dialogue NARRATIVE. Remember, it’s all about “dialogue”, yet we know, from the Peterson lectures that post-Modernists don’t believe in dialogue.

Moreover, the neo-Modernists don’t believe in the objective meaning of words and their common usage. Words, like everything else, are only social constructs. (Here we need to point out one exception, intrinsically disordered behavior, which is always biological… naturally.)  Words represent “power structures” that need to be overcome.

So the “sin” that the FCAR document commits is that it causes a negative emotional reaction against the dialogue NARRATIVE, i.e. the implication that “Francis doesn’t want to dialogue”. Therefore, this situation is bad not from the absence of an objective good, i.e. no dialogue, but rather from the point of view of the visual,… the optics of Francis evading dialogue. The situation created by the FCAR produces an emotionally detrimental situation since it makes Francis look like a hypocrite.

Yes?

Next, and the far larger problem that the FCAR represents is found in the following text:

We do not share in the slightest the position of those who consider the See of Peter vacant, nor of those who want to attribute to others the indivisible responsibility of the Petrine munus.

In light of the above defined post-Modernist framework, this is the most egregious form of material “heresy” that can exist in a post-Modernist pseudo-religious sect. The issue is as follows: not only does “naming” a counter NARRATIVE bring it to life, naming it also “platforms” it.

Now for those uninitiated or those who are not up to speed on what the concept “platforming” entails, I will refer you to a Harvard Business School publication that explains the concept below: (see here)

We typically think of companies competing over products — the proverbial “build a better mousetrap.” But in today’s networked age, competition is increasingly over platforms. Build a better platform, and you will have a decided advantage over the competition.

So to put our FCAR in this “platforming” CONTEXT, we see that by identifying the “product(s)”, i.e. counter-NARRATIVES, as

the “position of those who consider the See of Peter vacant”

and

“those who want to attribute to others the indivisible responsibility of the Petrine munus.”

… and further by referring to these two “counter-NARRATIVES” by name in the FCAR, the Cardinals not only allowed these two “products” to arise, but far worse, allowed these two counter-Narratives to be “platformed” on a Catholic Church Cardinal’s platform.

Furthermore, by not criticizing these TWO new counter-NARRATIVES in the FCAR, what the Cardinals have done, in this framework of course, is to grant these counter-NARRATIVES legitimacy. In other words, the Cardinals are treating these TWO counter-NARRATIVES as legitimate positions, while only implying that their position is the more preferable one for the bishopr of Rome.

But even if they had criticized the named TWO counter-NARRATIVES in that document, the Cardinals would still be engaged in something that is now in the post-Modernist framework known as “normalization”.

And naturally, there are such things as “normalization NARRATIVES”.

Aside, please see the link here for an example from the POLITICAL sub-set of the Visibilium Omnium, et Invisibilium.

So concluding, the most interesting aspect of the Four Cardinal Audience Request, from a post-Modernist point of view, is twofold: the appearance of not one, but TWO counter-Narratives being “platformed” by the Cardinals and the “normalization” of the TWO counter-Narratives.

Just to stress how important the “normalization” issue currently is, here is a link to the critique of the Alex Jones interview done by Megyn Kelly which appear last Sunday on her new show on NBC. This comes by way of the National Review post titled: Megyn Kelly’s Gift to Alex Jones. Here is the pertinent text:

A broader indictment is that she’s mainstreaming or normalizing Jones.

And then the author goes on to relate the following:

This is a huge gift to Jones. Even if Kelly does everything possible to avoid the appearance of “normalizing Jones,” he comes out of this a winner because his fans will love it and be re-affirmed in their belief that he’s important. And at least some people who haven’t heard of him will think this joker is more significant than he is.

On an aside, what’s funny about the author of this post is that he can’t even be bothered to research who is normalizing whom, in that Jones has a much larger audience that Megyn Kelly. Kelly got 3.5million viewers for her Jones Interview show, while Jones got approximately 22 million for the parallel transmission while the NBC show was running and corollary videos.

On another aside, whatever happened to the National Review? Excuse the digression…

Which brings me to the final point, and an answer to the question posed by the Call Me Jorge Blog, namely:

What was Francis reaction when he read this letter?

Here is my guess…

The NORMALIZATION PROCESS™ – French Election Debrief…

Tags

Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

As most of my dear and loyal reader know by now, the empty suit that wears the name Emmanuel Macron has won the French presidential election. This will not come as a shock to my loyal readers since it was predicted by yours truly.

The primary reason for why your humble blogger did not predict a win for Marine Le Pen was due to the economic “specifics” of France. The primary motivating factor that Marine Le Pen had going against her was her overt antipathy toward the European Union. Actually, not the European Union per se, but rather the funding mechanism that divides the spoils of the main contributing nations, i.e. Germany and Great Britain. Spoils of which the French are major beneficiaries. Yes, it’s that “backward” French agricultural sector that needs to be subsidized in perpetuity. But I digress…

On an aside, Great Britain is negotiating their Brexit presently and once they are out, the EU will lose a net €10billion from the collective kitty. But I digress again…

So the dynamic that was at play in France was one similar to that which Ronald Reagan observed when he noticed that a recession is when your neighbor loses his job while a depression is when you lose your job. In that light, the French dynamic at play could be characterized as “recessions are acceptable”.

And that was a common thread in the comments that I have read, i.e. that no one was under the illusion that it would get better with Macron, as long as it did not get any worse. And Marine Le Pen did not read this mood too well and did not provide the electorate an alternative “election philosophy” of hope, one for which the French would want to make sacrifices. Anyways, I will have more to say on just this in the future.

So given the rationale above, this is how your humble blogger saw the French Presidential election of 2017 and wrote it down in three post under the following titles:

French Election – The Black Swan Event… (w/Update)

The NORMALIZATION PROCESS™ – Can She Do It?

Vive La France… (w Updates)

So today, I will do a debrief of how the second round voting transpired and a brief commentary about what can be expected to transpire in the country that used to be commonly referred to as the Church’s eldest daughter.

As to what you dear reader and the French citizenry can expect in the months ahead can be described as turbulence. The main cause for this turbulence is that the new French President does not have a political party in the current French parliament. Actually, President Macron is an empty suit that was created by the outgoing president François Hollande and Macron’s base was the socialist party headed by Hollande.

In order to fool the gullible voters, a “new” movement was created, a movement called the En Marche. The problem with this shell movement now, is that it has to transform itself into a political party. The problem becomes that if the En Marche becomes a political party, it will cannibalize the existing socialist party. And I don’t think that the socialists will allow that to happen.

What makes this situation even more comical is that the next parliamentary elections are in June of this year. Yes folks, a month from now. So what will have to happen in this month’s time is that the outgoing president Hollande will have to pull a sleight of hand and explain to the French that the shell movement En Marche is really the socialist party in disguise.

An alternative scenario is that Hollande will allow Macron to actually transform the shell movement into a political party. What this will do is break up the electorate even further and could allow for the “right” wing political forces to win the June election. And if that happens, then France goes into what is known as cohabitation where a leftist president rules with a right wing parliament and NOTHING HAPPENS for the next 4 years.

On the other hand, there are some that think a lot will happen… (see here).

And on the back of all the above, a Macron insider released 9 gigabytes of inside information that completely compromise the newly elected president. (see here, here and  here)

I will stop here, but will have more to say in future posts.

Below I will reproduce a post from the blog GalliaWatch. It does a good job of explaining OBJECTIVE REALITY in France. I will reproduce the post below, while the original can be linked to here.

No surprises. A long road ahead.

The final tally was Macron 65.5%, Marine Le Pen 34.5%. She doubled her father’s 2002 score. The abstention rate was 25%, higher than the first round. The legitimacy of the new president is already seriously compromised and could make a Macron sweep in the legislative elections difficult.

Estimate: 21 million votes for Macron. 11.4 million votes for Le Pen. 4 million blank/invalid votes.

Note: A blank vote is a clean ballot inside an envelope with no choice indicated; an invalid vote is a damaged ballot. These votes are not counted into the final tally. Why would someone turn in a blank ballot? Possibly because neither candidate is acceptable but the person wants to vote; possibly out of contempt; possibly to be a nuisance.

Emmanuel Macron remains below the 50% mark.

According to Marine Le Pen, those who supported Emmanuel Macron have been discredited. Henceforth, the Front National constitutes the only opposition force to the new president and she intends to lead the battle for the legislative elections in June. It is a choice between patriots and globalists that will be submitted to the French people, voting district by voting district. She has announced the transformation of the Front National into a new political force. They are speaking of a “Patriotic and Republican Alliance.”

Nicolas Dupont-Aignan will continue his alliance with Marine Le Pen but will not be part of the new movement. He will present candidates in every voting district for the legislative elections.

François Baroin of Les Républicains announced he will oppose the new president whom he supported…

Note: Baroin had hoped to be François Fillon’s prime minister. Baroin had been minister of Finance under Sarkozy. He voted for Macron, and has indicated he would like to be the opposition Prime minister in the event of victory of the right and center in the legislative elections. He is obviously very supple.

According to Laurent Wauquiez, president of the region Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, and vice-president of Les Républicains:

“Emmanuel Macron is a president elected without enthusiasm. For the right, this is not the time to compromise.”

Note: I believe Wauquiez voted for Macron. He certainly did not vote for Marine. So he has not only compromised, he has collaborated.

According to estimates, 48% of François Fillon’s voters voted for Macron. 32% abstained or turned in blank or invalid ballots, and 20% voted for Le Pen.

Note: Fillon’s betrayal of Marine Le Pen and his support for Macron, and Marine’s poor performance in the debate, remain the two outstanding calamities of the election (besides the presence of Macron himself).

Photo above: Macron’s France. We see the Algerian flag, the crowds at the Louvre, and a journalist.

LSB readers comments:

– I hope Marine understands that 2017 was for her the equivalent of 2002 for her father and that she will never obtain a large vote. Her nullity was displayed in the debate; her aggressiveness and her hysteria caused her to go from 40/41% to 35% in four days. She should leave the presidency of the FN.

– “You wanted to avoid war at the cost of dishonor. You will have dishonor and you will have war.”

– We await with great interest the invalidation of this election. That would be the case in a democracy.

Note: Both Macron and Hollande obtained less than 50% of the votes of registered voters.

– Anti-Macron demonstrations in all the big cities tonight; vandalism and violence go on, the taxpayers pay!

– When will the Conference of Bishops of France become the Great Lodge of Bishops of France? They can go to Soros for their donations.

– I was struck by Macron’s victory speech. The poor fellow was pale, without composure, almost inaudible. He repeated clichés that expressed his love for France. Pathetic, and troubling. Marine is better when she is calm. Her strategy for the next five years is rather convincing.

– Congrats to all the cowards who chose Macron.

– Marine Le Pen should leave the FN and Asselineau should replace her. Just in debating alone, he would have flattened Macron! He would not have mixed things up as Marine did with the euro. Marine does not have the intelligence of a president.

Note: François Asselineau, a highly effective speaker, and right-wing politician, received few votes in the first round.

– At the end of the debate between Hollande junior and Marine Le Pen, I found that Marine had dominated the debate… After two days of media commentary I almost began to have doubts.

From Le Salon Beige.

The Battle For Your Mind – What Is Truth?

Tags

Cavalcade of the Three Kings, Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Today your humble blogger returns to the NARRATIVE. 

Over at the Zero Hedge website, we get a post titled Schumer: “U.S. Is No Longer Fact-Based” Nation; Breitbart News A “Threat To Democracy”. And this post is too juicy to let pass by without presenting it to my loyal readers.

Furthermore, the subject matter of this post dovetails quite neatly with that of another post that appears on the OnePeterFive blog, written by Maike Hickson. (see here) In that post, Mrs Hickson translates an interview given by the Head of the SSPX breakaway group, the Fraternal Society of St. Peter’s Father Bernhard Gerstle .

Without commenting on the post itself, (I would like my dear readers to read and judge for themselves) all I will say is that if that part of the post-conciliar church that is promoting the Restoration of all things in Christ, is not able to define truth as bringing the mind into conformity with reality (adaequatio rei et intellectus), then what is in fact left is simply to push the post-conciliar NARRATIVE.

The problem with pushing the NARRATIVE, or any NARRATIVE for that matter, is that it introduces cognitive dissonance into the minds of the Faithful. And just to remind everyone what cognitive dissonance entails, it is this: (see here)

In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts one of those beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts one of the beliefs, ideas, and values.

This state of mind produces a feeling of discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

Now, in order to restore balance, the mentally stressed party is forced to take one of two alternative routes:

Scientific Method: a method of inquiry commonly based on empirical or measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. (Bringing mind into conformity with reality – adaequatio rei et intellectus)

Magic Thinking:  denotes the belief that one’s thoughts by themselves can bring about effects in the world or that thinking something corresponds with doing it. (Bringing thought into line with life – adaequatio realis mentis et vitae)

So at the end of the day, the question that everyone, including the good Father is reduced to asking is the same question that Pontius Pilate asked in this below dialogue:

And just to drive the point home, below is the Zero Hedge post with an example from the political sub-set of the Visibilium Omnium, and the “distinguished” Senator who has obviously taken sides.

*****

Schumer: “U.S. Is No Longer Fact-Based” Nation; Breitbart News A “Threat To Democracy”

Last Friday Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a press release reminding sanctuary cities of their obligation to enforce federal immigration laws or risk losing their federal funding.  Within the release, Sessions noted that Chicago’s murder rate has risen “more than 50 percent from the 2015 levels” and that New York City continues to experience gang murders due to the city’s “soft on crime” stance.  Here’s what he said:

“Additionally, many of these jurisdictions are also crumbling under the weight of illegal immigration and violent crime. The number of murders in Chicago has skyrocketed, rising more than 50 percent from the 2015 levels. New York City continues to see gang murder after gang murder, the predictable consequence of the city’s “soft on crime” stance. And just several weeks ago in California’s Bay Area, after a raid captured 11 MS-13 members on charges including murder, extortion and drug trafficking, city officials seemed more concerned with reassuring illegal immigrants that the raid was unrelated to immigration than with warning other MS-13 members that they were next.”

We suspect that Sessions’ “soft on crime” comment was in reference to an ongoing feud between the NYPD and Mayor Bill De Blasio that erupted back in 2014 after De Blasio effectively legitimized the assassination of two cops in broad daylight by referring to minorities as “oppressed” and “threatened” by local police.  The situation garnered national media attention when the NYPD turned their backs on De Blasio after he showed up at the funeral ceremony of the murdered cops.

Of course, the main stream media had a slightly different interpretation of Sessions’ “soft on crime” comment and has worked itself into a tizzy insisting that the Department of Justice is ‘attacking’ the NYPD. 

As evidence, here is a comical exchange from MSNBC this morning in which Joe Scarborough insists that Sessions is “attacking the NYPD” while Mika accuses the DOJ of propagating “fake news”:

Scarborough:  “The Attorney General sends out a letter basically attacking the NYPD saying that they are ‘soft on crime.’  Has he never been to New York?”

Schumer:  “We are the lowest of the 25 biggest cities in crime.”

Mika:  “But they say crime is out of control.”

Schumer:  “My daughters ride the subway at 4am and I’m perfectly happy about it.  We are a safe city.  And, by the way, New York has grown from 7 million people in 1990 to 8.5 million today, the largest of any city because crime went down.”

Mika:  “There’s this talk about ‘fake news’ but that quote we just put up there is ‘fake news’ coming from the Attorney General.”

Schumer:  “We’re no longer fact-based.  The founding fathers created a country based on fact.  We don’t have a fact base.  If Breitbart News and the New York Times are regarded with equal credibility, you worry about this democracy.”

We won’t even bother to highlight all of the instances in which the New York Times decided to push ‘fake news’ regarding the Trump administration’s alleged ties to Russian hackers (but feel free to read this for an example:  “NYTimes Reports Trump Aides’ “Repeated Contact” With Russian Intel Officials, Admits No Collusion Discovered“).

That said, we can at least agree with Chuck that many politicians no longer live in a “fact-based” world….in fact, here is just one of our favorite examples…

..and this one is also very good.

Fake News – The Need For A “Day After” Pill! (w/Update)

Tags

Catholic Church, Catholic Church in Poland, Cavalcade of the Three Kings, Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Folks, you can’t make this stuff up!

As my loyal readers can no doubt confirm, during the presidential campaign this past November, your humble blogger spent a lot of time on the subject of “FAKE NEWS”.

We identified this phenomenon (see here) and explained how it fits into the wider scheme of things (see here). We even pointed out how Fake News, known as “Coprophagia” in FrancisChurch, has seeped (no pun intended) its way into the ECCLESIASTICAL sub-set of human endeavor. (see here)

But nowhere in my wildest dreams could I have ever anticipated how big FAKE NEWS was to become with the advent of the Trump Presidency. Furthermore, I could not have imagined how overtly and crassly the FAKE NEWS LEGACY MEDIA would deploy this “tool of the trade” in the WAR FOR YOUR MIND that they launched against The Donald.

So just like the old saying goes, the one about “real life being stranger than fiction”, I bring you, what can be described as the FAKE NEW’S DAY AFTER!

And from the looks of things, it would appear as if the NYT could sure use a “fake news day after pill”!

Via the Zero Hedge website (see here)…

*****

The NY Times Explains Why There Is So Much “Confusion” About Its “Trump Wiretapping” Story

In the aftermath of the Trump accusation that Obama wiretapped his phone during the election, an allegation which the flagbearers of the “truthful” (according to their various advertising campaigns) anti-Trump media wave, namely the Washington Post and the New York Times have vehemently denied, an unexpected victim has emerged over the past few days: the New York Times itself.

The reason is that while the NYT has repeatedly criticized and denied Trump’s allegation, it itself had written an article on January 19 titled, in the print version, “Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides’, and online “Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates“, by reporters Michael Schmidt and Michael Shear, which paradoxically corroborated much, if not all of what Trump himself said, and quotes the usual anonymous source who said that “wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House” as part of an investigation into “the business dealings that some of the president-elect’s past and present advisers have had with Russia.”

So with various conservative blogs taking the NYT to task over this seeming contradiction, and even the WaPo’s own fact-checker seemingly confused…

… today the NYT’s public editor, Liz Spayd felt compelled to address its January 19 article which, implicitly, substantiated much of Trump’s allegation, and to explain why that’s not the case.

She starts by saying that “Trump’s assertions, however overinflated, nonetheless echo certain aspects of The New York Times’s reporting from recent weeks. That, in turn, has allowed his administration to assert that the basis for his claims rests, in part, on reporting by The Times.”

On the surface, there are similarities. Both The Times and Trump have referred to wiretaps. Both have referenced White House knowledge of the investigations. And both have described efforts by officials from the Obama administration to involve itself in the continuing investigations of Trump and Russia.

Maybe Trump is not a completely raving lunatic after all. So where are the differences:

For one, as The Times (and others) has made clear, these investigations have been conducted by the F.B.I., intelligence agencies and Congress, not by Obama himself. The Times has also said Obama administration officials sought to spread intelligence about a possible link between Trump and Russia to ensure a trail of evidence for investigators, but it said Obama himself was not involved. And no Times reporter has claimed that any warrants have been issued to spy on Trump or his associates.

And there it is again: several months after we thought we would never again hear the old “Obama had no idea what was going on excuse”, it strikes yet again, only this time we find it very difficult to believe that Obama, who expanded the distributions of confidential NSA data to multiple offices just weeks before his final day in office, had no clue that Trump was being wiretapped.

There’s more, and this is where things get delightfully Orwellian, because as Spayd “explains”, the confusion is really just a function of readers being confused because, well, it’s complicated:

Distinguishing between Trump’s assertions and The Times’s reporting is essential. Yet readers at this juncture may be understandably confused on what is true and not in one of the most important ongoing news stories in the country.

More details about this pervasive “confusion” fanned by none other than the NYT itself:

Several readers have written in this week saying they’re having a hard time squaring The Times’s own past reports of wiretapping with the paper’s assertions that there is no firm evidence that any warrants for wiretaps have been issued. Readers also expressed confusion with The Times’s assertion that it would be illegal for a White House to receive information about such investigations, when its own wiretapping story in January said the Trump White House was given some information from intercepted communications.

“For months now the NY Times and many other mainstream news sources has been running stories based on anonymous leaks saying that a massive investigation was going on into Trump and company’s Russian dealings based on wiretaps and intel intercepts,” wrote John Penley of Asheville, N.C. “Now Obama officials are saying this all never happened so my question is this: Why have the NY Times and others been saying it has for months now basing their stories on anonymous leaks?”

So to eliminate the confusion, here is the NYT’s explanation of how the wiretapping of Trump and/or his associates, which eventually made its way to the White House – as per the NYT – didn’t really happen.

I reached out to editors in the Washington bureau to seek their help in clarifying the difference between Clapper’s — and The Times’s — assertions that no warrants had been issued, and the reference to wiretapping in the January story.

Elisabeth Bumiller, the bureau chief, said the January story was referring to information picked up from wiretaps and other intelligence collected overseas, a process that requires no warrants.

Still confused? Don’t worry: the NYT even has a Q&A to help you out of your cognitive dissonance predicament”:

There’s a lot to parse. And doing so, in a way that is clear to readers, is not easy when the subject matter is complicated and the information that reporters receive comes under strict terms of how it can be used. One reporter, Charlie Savage, produced a helpful Q. and A. explaining the law around wiretaps and key terms. But it didn’t try to show how Trump’s claims line up against The Times’s past reporting.

Sarcasm aside, what the NYT’s long-winded explanation boils down to is that Trump’s inner circle was wiretapped, but the difference is whether Obama knew about it or not. And if anyone harbors any gullible thoughts that the president who lied to the public about his knowledge of Hillary’s email server – arguably the biggest fiasco of her presidential campaign – but is telling the truth when he says that he has no idea whatsoever that someone, somewhere was in fact wiretapping Trump as the NYT reports, then we wish you all the best as you click away on all the other NYT “Q&A”s to help you in your misery.

UPDATE 00:30 10 March 2017

Straight out of Orwell’s 1984… (see here)

… but it gets better…

Fix Is In: House Committee on ‘Russian Hacking’ Includes Only DNC-Hired Tech Experts (see here)

A list of witnesses scheduled to appear at a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Open Hearing on “Russian Active Measures” contains a glaring problem: the only technical experts scheduled to testify are from CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is a firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and has become the primary source of the narrative about “Russian hacking” of the 2016 election and has acted as a mouthpiece for the Democrats since last June.

And these are the Republicrats Republicans who are doing this!

For the real news on this wiretapping issue, I bring you Stefan Molyneux:

Flight 93 Election: Play by Play… (9) – The Battleground States Edition (BREAKING)

Tags

Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, President Donald J. Trump, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s chastity belts, s Chlamydia trachomatis, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sBoris Johnson, sCatholic Church, sCavalcade of the Three Kings, sCryptosporidium, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Tags Catholic Church in Poland, TagsBREXIT, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

BREAKING

Demo-RATs in FULL PANIC MODE!

Obama loses composure, GOES NUTS! (see here)

Stikes out at the late Sen. Rober Byrd.

“Revolutions eat their children” eventually!

BREAKING

Just as predicted, we have MATERIAL PROOF of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE that just appeared in the WikiLeaks disclosures. Here is the email chain: (see here)

But hey, let’s throw around the idea that maybe Director Comey did not adhere to protocol when he re-opened the SERVERGATE Investigation.

I’m sure we can keep this conversation going til November 9!

BREAKING

Via Drudge Report, RASMUSSEN polls TRUMP OVER 50% for first time with “voters who are certain to vote”. (SEE HERE)

Further confirmation of OBJECTIVE REALITY.

Just to summerize, Rasmussen: Trump +3; LA Times/USD: Trump +5; IBD/TIPP: Even.

BUT. IT. GETS. BETTER.

Yes, you read that right: 88% of voters say they are now certain how they will vote. Among these voters, Trump has a 10-point lead over Clinton – 53% to 43%.

Which means, in mathematical terms, that as I write this post, TRUMP has 46.64% (53% x 88%) of the total vote of the decided VOTERS, while Sick, Crooked, Unelectable Hillary has only 37.84% of the decided VOTERS.

Let that sink in for a minute or two…

Folks, THIS. IS. OBJECTIVE, REALITY.

Nota bene: the above are three CREDIBLE POLLS that your humble blogger has identified and watches. Once we get the IBD/TIPP latest, you can rest assured it will be posted.

TOP OF THE PAGE

Before I start today’s Play-by-Play, I would like to draw your attention to the preceding post. In that post, I explain why, barring a last minute surprise, The Donald will be the next POTUS. It all has to do with DEMOGRAPHICS and “over sampling” and it presently has TeamSickHillary in a TIZZY.

But first, did you all see SickHillary get rattled by a single protester who shouted “Bill is a rapist”? (see here)

Unstable…

But I digress… and anyways…

So let’s do this thread first.

Please read the last post titled  Clintons Can Corrupt Anything, But Fat Lady Has Already Sung…. The below will be a continuation of this thread.

First

Oh my! (via Drudge Report) (see here)

Oh^2 my! (via Drudge -the PRESSTITUTES at McClatchy DC) (see here)

But they just can’t let go… of the NARRATIVE.

Oh^3 my! (via Drudge -the PRESSTITUTES at the WSJ) (see here)

I used to be a subscriber and respected them.

And I am not alone… (see here)

“Not no more”…

Oh^4 my! (via Drudge- WashTimes) (see here)

Please note this post. I will return to it in a future post.

Oh^5 my! (via Drudge – CNS) (see here)

Wonder what the “sample composition” was that resulted in the 45% figure?

Oh^6 my! And a BIG ONE at that. The CUBBIES finally broke the drought! 

Finally!

Of secondary importance is the right hand side column.

Second NC Poll Confirms Trump’s Solid Tar Heel Lead Over Clinton…

and

…Poll: Trump Ties Clinton in Colorado as Surge Continues…

and

…Trump Takes 3-Point Lead in Virginia

and

Monmouth University Poll: Clinton Locked in Statistical Tie With Trump in Pennsylvania

and

Outlier or Harbinger? Pennsylvania Poll Shows Trump Up by One Percent

and

DONALD TRUMP Leads by 5 Points in Latest North Carolina Poll

and

Breaking Poll: DONALD TRUMP Erases 12 Point Deficit – Is Up 3 Points IN VIRGINIA!

and

DONALD TRUMP Now Up in New Hampshire – Leads Crooked Hillary By One Point

We HYPOTHESISED that as we near Election Day, the POLL-STERS will start to take out their “adjustments” and “skews”. And it’s happening… Like MAGIC! 

It’s as if the FBI re-opening the SERVERGATE investigation was a godsend…

Who would have thunk?

Please keep these states in mind. I will return to them later…

Oh^7 my! A real conversion? (see here)

And the re-action… (see here)

An alert citizenry is the best defense…

and (see here)

If I was a betting man, I would suspect that the Demon-rats are opening ballots ILLEGALLY to see what the VOTE COMPOSITION looks like. This might also account for the PANIC that was highlighted in the  Clintons Can Corrupt Anything, But Fat Lady Has Already Sung…. 

NEXT THREAD

In a previous post, we HYPOTHESISED that this SERVERGATE Investigation could be an attempt to distract the general population from the ADMITTED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that is appearing in the WikiLeak disclosures. Here is another example: Podesta To Mills: “We Are Going To Have To Dump All Those Emails”

And then there is Peter Kadzik (see here and here)

It’s been days since this unfortunate appointment by the Department of Justice to have Mr. Kadzik oversee the FBI Investigations, the exposed conflicts of interest and demonstrated collusions and…. silence from the MainStreamMedia AGITPROPS.

All those Pulitzer Prizes just begging to be won… and no one is interested.

NEXT

Another thread that we have been following is this “tug of war” between the DOJ and the FBI. Last time we checked in, we observed that both Mr. Comey and Mrs Lynch were both being supported by the POTUS.

The situation has clarified now, since Obama has come out on the side of the AG Lorreta Lynch. Here is that post: (see here)

But, but, but…

The this simple situation has just become more complicated. It would appear that the AG, one Loretta Lynch has not been completely forthcoming. Here is that post: (see here)

Just to remind those whose memories seem so conveniently to fail, Comey is the FBI director, not a Justice Department prosecutor, much less the attorney general. The FBI is not supposed to exercise prosecutorial discretion. The FBI is not supposed to decide whether the subject of a criminal investigation gets indicted. The FBI, moreover, is not obligated to make recommendations about prosecution at all; its recommendations, if it chooses to make them, are not binding on the Justice Department; and when it does make recommendations, it does so behind closed doors, not on the public record.

Yet, in the Clinton e-mails investigation, it was Comey who made the decision not to indict Clinton. Comey, furthermore, made the decision in the form of a public recommendation. In effect, it became The Decision because Attorney General Loretta Lynch had disgraced herself by furtively meeting with Mrs. Clinton’s husband a few days before Comey announced his recommendation. Comey, therefore, gave Mrs. Clinton a twofer: an unheard-of public proclamation that she should not be indicted by the head of the investigative agency; and a means of taking Lynch off the hook, which allowed the decision against prosecution to be portrayed as a careful weighing of evidence rather than a corrupt deal cooked up in the back of a plane parked on a remote tarmac. Now, suddenly, Mrs. Clinton is worried about law-enforcement interference in politics.

So those are the FACTS.

And here is the problem: (see here)

Start with Attorney General Loretta Lynch. A cavalcade of former Justice heavyweights are now assailing FBI director James Comey for reopening the Clinton email file, and Justice sources are leaking that the director went rogue despite Ms. Lynch’s counsel not to alert Congress so close to an election.

But Mr. Comey works for the Attorney General. If she thinks Mr. Comey was breaking Justice rules by sending Friday’s letter to Congress, then she had every right to order him not do so. If Mr. Comey sent the letter anyway, and he didn’t resign, Ms. Lynch could then ask President Obama to fire him.

Our guess is that she didn’t order Mr. Comey not to send the letter precisely because she feared Mr. Comey would resign—and cause an even bigger political storm. But the worst approach is to let a subordinate do something you believe is wrong and then whisper afterwards that you told him not to. The phrase for that is political cowardice.

Some would say “political cowardice” other would say “conspiracy to obstruct justice”, but hey, I’m not the attorney.

So where does that leave us. We see that The Bamster is trapped. He can’t make a move, since whatever he does, he will undermine his own position. Remember, regardless of whether The Donald wins, the investigations WILL commence. And that could really take a toll on the golf time that the former POTUS is looking forward to after his 8 year SLOG of taking care of the peoples business.

The thread of Obama taking emergency measures and suspending the election if SickHillary “steps aside” is receding… (see here)

Besides, the Bamster can’t pardon himself.

All he can do is “take the fi’th”, like his AG in the Iran Cash Giveaway scandal. (see here)

NEXT THREAD

Another nail is driven in the “it’s the Russians” NARRATIVE. (see here)

Oh and there is so much more EVIDENCE of CRIMANAL ACTIVITY... but the PRESSTITUTES are still debating the finer points of DOJ/FBI protocol.

 

Clintons Can Corrupt Anything, But Fat Lady Has Already Sung…

Tags

Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, President Donald J. Trump, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s chastity belts, s Chlamydia trachomatis, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sBoris Johnson, sCatholic Church, sCavalcade of the Three Kings, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Tags Catholic Church in Poland, TagsBREXIT, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Today’s post will focus on DEMOGRAPHICS. 

But first, a quote from Leslie Wimes, a South Florida-based president of the Democratic African-American Women Caucus. 

 “Hillary Clinton’s campaign is in panic mode. Full panic mode,” said Leslie Wimes, a South Florida-based president of the Democratic African-American Women Caucus.

“They have a big problem because they thought Obama and Michelle saying, ‘Hey, go vote for Hillary’ would do it. But it’s not enough,” Wimes said, explaining that too much of the black vote in Florida is anti-Trump, rather than pro-Clinton. “In the end, we don’t vote against somebody. We vote for somebody.”

Before we go on, being the good Thomists that we are on this blog, a definition is in order.

What DEMOGRAPHICS refers to, in a nutshell, is the measurement of VOTING PATTERNS across different segments of society. When a polling entity (LEGIT) or a POLL-STER (FRAUDULENT) decides on creating a POLL, he first needs to make some base line assumptions. And the most important baseline assumptions are made as to the composition of the population that he will be sampling, or POLLING as in our case. These base line assumptions regarding DEMOGRAPHICS then decide how many demo-rats, republicans, independents, blacks, women, people aged 18-28 etc., will be included in the set (sample POPULATION) that is being sampled and their respective weightings. By the term “weighting”, what is meant is this: the percentage of the sample POPULATION that will each component comprise. For example, Black women will comprise 4.3% of the total sample POPULATION.

Quick summary. The two most important aspects of defining a sample set (POPULATION) are it’s composition and the respective weightings.

Now, the manner in which a POLLING entity constructs it’s sample POPULATION will determine whether the resulting POLL is LEGIT, or whether it is NOT, i.e. “GOAL SEEKING”.

And as you can no doubt tell, a POLL is “GOAL SEEKING” when it’s construction is designed to obtain a specific result.

The above is the background to understanding the significance of the email below. As we can read, this email “conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to “manufacture” the desired data”. : (see here)

Given the above, the next question that needs to be asked in this logical sequence is: why would Demo-rat-ic Party operatives want “independent” POLLING entities to corrupt their “OBJECTIVE” data?

The answer comes via a Zero Hedge post (see here) where we can read the following: (emphasis is from ZH)

I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.

In other words, the “media polling” was a part of a larger STRATEGY. Actually, the “media polling” based STRATEGY was so key, that this above email:

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations.

The above “recommendations” for “POLLS” which allow for said parties to: “maximize what we get out of our media polling” were then used to build NARRATIVES.

The most famous, or rather INFAMOUS NARRATIVE that arose was the creation of a VIRTUAL REALITY that Sick, Crooked, Unelectable Hillary has already WON THE ELECTION.

One such example of this NARRATIVE at work can be DISCERNED from the catholic Zero Hedge blog post titled  Hillary Allies Think The Race Is Over As Trump Declares Himself The Debate Winner (see here) from the 20TH OF OCTOBER. This is what we call WEAPONIZING DESPONDENCY on this blog, a favorite tactic of TeamFrancis coincidently.

But back to the NARRATIVE.

So since the 20th of October when “Hillary Allies Think The Race Is Over” to the 2ND OF NOVERMBER (13 days) when we find a “Hillary Allies” IN PANIC MODE, as per citation at top of this post, something seems to have happened.

What happened is that through WikiLeak, we obtained irrefutable PROOF of the above explained MECHANISM. The disclosure of the above MECHANISM forced one POLL-STER, namely ABC/Wapo, to “adjust” the sample POPULATION to “CLOSER” reflect OBJECTIVE REALITY and we had a 13% POINT “ADJUSTMENT” (to date) in their POLL results. Here is how ZeroHedge explained this PHENOMENON: (see here)

Now, while ABC / Wapo claim that the 10-point swing (in less than a week) was driven by changes in “who’s intending to vote,” we find it quite curious that their own data shows just a 2-point swing in people who said they were “certain to vote” on 10/23, when the poll reflected a 12-point Hillary lead, and 10/27 when the lead had collapsed to just 2 points.  So, are we really expected to believe that a 2-point swing in voter intentions somehow translated to a 10-point swing in the poll results?  Not likely…something tells us it had a little more to do with including “ethnic ‘oversamples’ as required.”

So what the above is telling us is that just THIS adjustment in “ethnic oversamples” resulted in a 13% change in their poll results.

But this is not the end of the story. When they say “adjustment in ethnic oversamples“, what they are saying is that they just brought their POLL RESULTS to their initial BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS. But this in no way means that their BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS are not GOAL SEEKING in their design.

For this information, we go to the ZeroHege post mentioned above (see here) titled Hillary Camp In “Full Panic Mode” As Early Black Voter Turnout Plunges In Key Swing States. In this post, we can read the following: (emphasis ZH, emphasis DeusExMachina)

A few weeks ago we pointed out that Obama enjoyed massive, unprecedented spikes in black voter turnout in both the 2008 and 2012 elections.  After hovering around 50-55% for decades, black voter participation soared to over 60% in 2008 and 2012.  That said, in the past we’ve raised serious doubts over whether Hillary should expect the same level of enthusiasm from black voters in this election cycle or whether overall turnout of black voters would revert back to pre-Obama levels.

Unprecedented black voter turnout was a huge component of Obama’s victories in 2008 and 2012.  Per the chart below from the New York Times, after running in the low-to-mid 50% range for decades, black voter participation surged to over 60% for Obama in 2008 and 2012, the highest ever recorded.

So, the question is, should Hillary expect the same level of unprecedented black voter turnout that Obama was able to garner?  Apparently, her campaign is not convinced and that’s why, according to Leslie Wimes, President of the Democratic African-American Women Caucus, they’re in “full panic mode.”

What the above implies is that the BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS that the “Hillary Allies” are working under, are those that were in place for the 2012 (and 2008) election cycle.

And naturally, the reason that the “Hillary Allies” are in PANIC MODE is that those BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS that they have been working under are tuning out to be INCORRECT.

Or as the statistician would say: the POPULATION DATA IS CORRUPT.

So in this post, two examples from two BATTLEGROUND states are provided where this DATA CORRUPTION is becoming visible due to EARLY VOTING PATTERNS.

One state where EARLY VOTING PATTERNS are implying faulty (CORRUPT)  BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS is North Carolina. Here is that passage: (emphasis DEM)

As a reminder, Mitt Romney won North Carolina in 2012 by slightly over 2 points.  Given that black voters usually favor democrats by 80-90%, simple math implies that a 7-point reduction in blacks as a percentage of the overall electorate would hurt Hillary by roughly 6 points versus the 2012 results….not encouraging to say the least.

And here is the summary of the situation in Florida:

According to a recent article by Politico, in 2008 and 2012, Obama received 95% of the 1.7mm votes cast by black voters in Florida.  Given that, simple math would imply that a 9.5-point reduction in blacks as a percentage of the overall electorate would hurt Hillary by roughly 9 points, versus the 2012 results, which is disastrous news for a state that Obama narrowly won by less than 1 point. 

Unfortunately for Hillary, a recent poll from Florida Atlantic University provides even more bad news.  While Obama received 95% of the black vote in Florida in 2012, Hillary is only polling at 68% among black voters while Trump is polling at 20%. 

Concluding, what we are seeing is COLLUSION between the SickHillary Campaign and various “independent” “information centers”. We see polls being produced that “oversample” certain ethnic DEMOGRAPHICS on top of having incorporated “oversampled” other DEMOGRAPHICS (Dem/Rep/Ind breakdown for example) as a part of their BASE LINE ASSUMPTIONS.

The situation that using such faulty methodology created was this: it made these POLL-STERS producing these CORRUPTED results and the PRESSTITUTES using these FAKE results the subject of ridicule after this MECHANISM was brought to light by WikeLeaks.

But there is a secondary and more important lesson to be learned here. It would appear that the perpetrators of this FRAUD, actually believed that the RESULTS that the POLL-STERS were providing, were an accurate depiction of OBJECTIVE REALITY.

And it is only now, with 5 days to go in the campaign that the FRAUDSTERS realize that they have woken up with their hand in the proverbial bedpan. 

And they are PANICING.

But it is too late.

Barring any unexpected last minute surprise, it would appear that the “fat lady” who Dick Motta, the former coach of the Chicago Bulls used to refer to, “has already sung”.

Chalk another one up to the Law of Unintended Consequences and maybe even to the true “God of surprises”.

Oh, and one more thing. The real “God of surprises” might not have uttered his last sound yet. At present, all the state election commissions have is sealed ballots. Once they start opening them and counting, is the moment when the “God of surprises” will bring their FAKE VIRTUAL REALITY in line with OBJECTIVE REALITY.

Let’s call that the ENCORE.

The Battle For Your Mind: The Rise Of The “Despair Trolls” (Update)

Tags

Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, President Donald J. Trump, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s chastity belts, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sBoris Johnson, sCatholic Church, sCavalcade of the Three Kings, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Tags Catholic Church in Poland, TagsBREXIT, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

TRUMP IS WINNING!

Great video that supports exactly what I have been seeing and have been posting on this blog regarding the 2016 Presidential Election.

Stefan Molyneux:

Underneath the videos, and this has really started to crop up over the last week. I don’t know if you noticed this, but there are a lot of despair trolls out there, who suddenly just seem to be emerging. And what they are doing is saying something like this:

‘ well you know, I do like Trump and it be great if he got in but, frankly there’s no way he can, it’s mathematically impossible. He’s done, it’s a shame, I really wanted him to get in but it looks like we are going to have to settle for Hillary’

like that kind of stuff.

And it’s actually quite effective. You know, it sounds like their positive but they’ve recognized reality.    

So how is that you and I stay positive?

Well, by a little tactic we call: LOOKING. AT. THE. FACTS.

For those who are still questioning what they are seeing, please view and pass around!

OMT The MainStreamMedia is beginning to recognize Trump’s “Hidden Vote”. Here is the Washington Times yesterday morning: (see here)

The ‘hidden’ Trump vote becomes a formidable force

By Jennifer Harper – The Washington Times – Thursday, October 27, 2016

Despite media hysteria and a daily influx of polls, a persistent conversation has emerged about the huge, hidden population of Americans who could suddenly step forward and vote for Donald Trump. It is a powerful, unknown factor with much potential — and one which makes Democratic strategists plenty nervous.

There are no standard ways of measuring this demographic. They could be evangelicals, dispossessed working-class folk, or disenchanted fans of Sen. Bernie Sanders and third party candidates. They could be small business owners, doubting Democrats, active-duty military, veterans, bikers, patriots, law enforcement personnel, seniors who remember another America, or impoverished millennials. Second Amendment fans and pro-lifers are certainly part of the hidden vote. No one knows the precise demographics, though there will be insight in future exit polls.

All of them, however, found something to like in Mr. Trump, and their motivation is paramount. National polls have consistently revealed that Trump voters are more passionate and engaged than those who favor Hillary Clinton.

“I still think Trump may win the election. The polls are very weird. We’ve seen how off they were with Brexit and the last UK general election. A hidden Trump vote is not unimaginable at all,” writes Powerline analyst Steven Hayward.

He points to a recent rousing speech made by Michael Moore before a live audience. The renegade filmmaker appears appreciative of Mr. Trump’s outsider status and plainspoken pitch, and that he is hated by the press and corporate America. A grinning and f-bombing Mr. Moore relished making this prediction about election day:

“Joe Blow, Steve Blow, Bob Blow, Billy Blow, Billy Bob Blow — all the Blows will get to blow up the whole [expletive] system because it’s their right. Trump’s election is going to be the biggest [f — k] you in human history and it will feel good,” Mr. Moore told his audience.

UPDATE 7:00 28 October 2016

This just showed up on The Drudge Report. (link to WashPo article here)

Hey, but she is still leading by 50 points!

Flight 93 Election: Play by Play… (3) (Many Updates)

Tags

chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, President Donald J. Trump, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sBoris Johnson, sCatholic Church, sCavalcade of the Three Kings, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Tags Catholic Church in Poland, TagsBREXIT, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch

Looks like I lost the content of the entire post, so I will start at last UPDATE.

I might be wrong, and I will go out on a limb here but…. (see here)

This looks like a diversionary tactic. If my hunch is correct, and it’s just a hunch, it could be that Sick Hillary is being put under an investigation to protect her and preempt any other investigation that could arise from the next WikiLeaks document drop.

I’m thinking out loud. FBI Director Comey had incriminating EVIDENCE already but dropped this investigation because he claimed he couldn’t prove “intent”. So if he couldn’t prove intent from existing documentary EVIDENCE – INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE, why would he be able to prove “intent” with new incriminating EVIDENCE.

Referencing our Thomist underpinnings, we know all about REAL INTENT or what we call INTENTION. And we know that this is an area as SUBJECTIVE as you can get. We are talking “mind of God” and something only “He” knows stuff here. Here is a reference passage:

(Latin intendere, to stretch toward, to aim at) is an act of the will by which that faculty efficaciously desires to reach an end by employing the means. It is apparent from this notion that there is a sharply defined difference between intention and volition or even velleity. In the first instance there is a concentration of the will to the point of resolve which is wholly lacking in the others. With the purpose of determining the value of an action, it is customary to distinguish various sorts of intentions which could have prompted it.

Given the above, especially the emphasised parts, what could possibly be in those new emails that would prove a “concentration of will to the point of resolve” that wasn’t in the other incriminating EVIDENCE?

Please keep in mind that this is a lady with chronic head problems who experiences regular memory loss- sometimes 40 within a span of 3 1/2 hours, especially when she is being “interviewed” by the FBI.

Which leads me to believe that we are being played.

It’s feels as if someone want to take our eyes off the real issue, and it could be this: (see here)

It’s the oldest magicians trick in the book, actually…