Tags
Benedict XVI, Bergoglio, Burno Forte, Cardinal Burke, Catholic Church, FNN, Fox News, Francis church, From Rome blog, George Orwell, George Soros, Glenn Beck, Joseph Ratzinger, messeging, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Neo-Pagan, new springtime, one world government, one world religion, optics, Pagan Christians, pathological, Pope Francis, Raymond Burke, Roman Curia, Rorate Caeli blog, spirit of Vatican II, Synod 2014, Vatican II
Soros Worried about Glenn Beck
Below is another excellent post from the From Rome blog. It follows up perfectly with a post that I re-blogged from the Rorate Caeli blog regarding George Orwell. (see here).
There is also a further, and more important matter that the From Rome post addresses and that is the control over the media that is exerted by a single individual and by coincidence, another individual named George, namely George Soros. For a better understanding of this situation, I have embedded two videos above of the Glenn Beck shows done while Beck was still at Fox. For those not familiar with the series of exposes that Beck did on Soros, I highly recommend a “duckduckgo” (remember, Catholics don’t google!) search. For our purposes, I have embedded one of these shows, and a second video of Beck explaining the reaction of Mr. Soros to this material. One of the reasons why I have mentioned the “Soros connection” is that the organizations that he funds or co-funds are becoming quite active in persecution of religious who proclaim the Gospel. Needless to say, their targeting is exclusively against Christians. And one can readily understand why they do not attack the “religion of peace”. If you dear reader don’t know why, the word “fatwa” should help explain. But I digress…
I would also like to draw your attention to the post on this blog titled “The Jesuitical Bait-and-Switch”. (see here) Please refer to paragraph 51. in the infamous “Relatio post disceptationem” and you will find this quite interesting, yet unrelated to the rest of the paragraph or document for that matter, sentence that reads as follows:
Nor is it acceptable that the pastor’s outlook be pressured or that international bodies make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations based on gender ideology.
Yet nowhere is this “pastor’s outlook being pressured” observation/complaint expanded upon. Besides, what Bruno “Slippery as an Eel” Forte, the author of this paragraph, was referring to was not the “pastor’s outlook” but rather the “pastor’s proclamation of the Gospel”. Be that as it may, the explanation of this out-of-place, yet quite telling sentence is in no doubt related to the video above.
Concluding, it would appear that the “ship that has sailed” with respect to the “one world government” mentioned in the meeting between Soros’ emissary and the Fox executive is in the process of acquiring a “one world religion”.
indignusfamulus said:
Dear SA
This new link is a MUST SEE -about Alfredo Rostgaard (Jewish-born-Atheist/ultra liberal)
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2014/12/i-must-confess-i-was-wrong-about-pope.html#more
“..one of the most flawed articles of my journalistic career…so absurd it would be shameful not to admit it in public
..”If I were a Christian, some penance for the rash conclusions of 2013 would be in order….for Atheists- self-criticism is enough.”
..”I made the mistake of comparing him to his predecessors..”
..”I recognize today that the pope is leading a revolution in Catholicism, that must be observed and shared by the Progressive forces in the planet. I don’t know if he will be victorious, because the reactionary currents may still have immense strengths.”
WHAT HE’S MOST ASHAMED OF WRITING THEN:
–” The same dogmas are still standing…: the centrality of religious faith on political and social issues, the irascible combat against women’s right to the interruption of pregnancy, and the affirmation of heterosexuality as the only possible erotic-affective relationship.”
–… the Catholic Church presents itself with a new face, capable of captivating the world to the same ideas of all time.”
–“The rightwing finds, in this renewal, a good reason for enthusiasm.”
AND WHAT HE THINKS NOW:
“–Pope Francis has since then belied all these arrogant predictions.–Besides battling the Vatican court and their interests, he launched a crusade to take Catholicism back to being in touch with social movements, embracing their goal.
–He struggles to reform the Church’s discourse on civil rights, including subject that had up to now been forbidden, such as the welcoming of sexual diversity and the defense of women’s health when faced with religious dogma.
–He reached out his hand to the Latin-American left, supporting Progressive experiences and disavowing the links between Catholic organizations and conservative conspiracies.
–If that were not enough, pope Francis was decisive in the talks that led the United States to re-establish diplomatic relations with Cuba, after over fifty years of rupture.”
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Hi,
Thks for the updates. I am on the road visiting family and don’t get to check my mail and what other blogs are writing regularly. What caught my eye is the “spin” that is being used by the left in order to push their agenda.
I particularly liked the “take Catholicism back to being in touch with social movements, embracing their goals”. Don’t recall this episode in Church history where “Catholicism was in touch with social movements”. Maybe it’s not just Francis who is making stuff up on the fly?
As to the abortion issue, objectively speaking it is a capital punishment issue if anything. Actually, it’s tantamount to the situation of a “lynching”. Premeditated murder. Secondly it is a per-natal care issue. As far as the health issue of the mother is concerned, it is non existent. Provided the mother takes care of her health, which will simultaneously take care of the health of her child.
All in all, we see how lethal a combination of ignorance and emotionalism can be.
S.A.
LikeLike
indignusfamulus said:
Dear SA,
Yes, this is definitely not a tradition-friendly writer. We find that taking in the warped views of the Church from the “worldly” occasionally, is a great help in assessing how they are responding to the crisis in the Church, and how we are doing in keeping our views of the gravity of the situation, in line with reality. Their joys and hopes for more “progress” usually reflect our corresponding agonies and sorrows over what is happening to souls. Their confusion levels say a lot about the terrible lack of clarity of the past 50 years, too. Right now, many Faithful bloggers seem right on target in their concerns.-judging partly from this one’s level of elation in finding himself so wrong about predicting this Pope would stay in line with Church Teachings.
It ‘s a good reminder of part of what our daily prayers are for.
.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Dear IF:
What makes me always positive is the FACT that GOD is rational, and so is His creation. Therefore, we can infer that only rational processes are sustainable in the long run. Therefore, anything irrational, like the “god of surprises’ or leftist ideologies are always destined to be failures, failures simply due to their intrinsic design.
In logical terms, the principle of non self-contradiction always holds.
Which leaves us only with the “in the mean time”, and this is always the tough part. Which brings a certain maxim to my mind, namely ” Pain is weakness leaving the body”. 😉
S.A.
LikeLike
indignusfamulus said:
Dear SA
So right! Hope we can remember that while being martyred, (in case God has that honor in store for us as well) 🙂 🙂
LikeLike
indignusfamulus said:
Dear SA (for your research pile)
The link below is chock-full of good leads, and info on the Pope’s 2015 plans to bring about the New World Order-agenda you’re exposing above. It was linked by FreeRepublic
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/27/pope-francis-edict-climate-change-us-rightwing
Here’s our mini-analysis:
FIRST- THE RESISTANCE:
-Dan Misleh, director of the Catholic climate covenant, said: “There will always be 5-10% of people who will take offence. They are very vocal and have political clout. This encyclical will threaten some people and bring joy to others. THE ARGUMENTS ARE AROUND ECONOMICS AND SCIENCE RATHER THAN MORALITY”
-Named in the article–Francis will be opposed by :
1. The powerful US evangelical movement, said Calvin Beisner, spokesman for the conservative Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, which has declared the US environmental movement to be “un-biblical” and a false religion. “The pope should back off,” he said. “The Catholic church is correct on the ethical principles but has been misled on the science. It follows that the policies the Vatican is promoting are incorrect. Our position reflects the views of millions of evangelical Christians in the US.”
2.–There is a contingent of Catholics here who say he should not be getting involved in political issues, that he is outside his expertise.”
3. — Francis’ “edict on climate change’ will be SO RADICAL that it [the author says] “is likely to attract resistance from Vatican conservatives
4. rightwing church circles, particularly in the US – where Catholic climate sceptics also include John Boehner, Republican leader of the House of Representatives and Rick Santorum, the former Republican presidential candidate.”
5. Cardinal George Pell, a former archbishop of Sydney who has been placed in charge of the Vatican’s budget, is a climate change sceptic who has been criticised for claiming that global warming has ceased and that if carbon dioxide in the atmosphere were doubled, then “plants would love it”.
======
THE POPE’S PLANS:
1. In 2015, he will issue “A papal encyclical– 50 to 60 pages long; it’s a big deal”.a lengthy message on the subject to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics–have it sent to all the Hierarchy, and read in all parishes…
2. – give an address to the UN general assembly
3.-call a summit of the world’s main religions.
=====
REASONS GIVEN: (by CLOSE-TO-THE- POPE, FELLOW ARGENTINIAN & current chancellor of the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences) BISHOP MARCELO SORONDO- at a London’s meeting of the Catholic development agency:
–“the pope’s wish (with our academics’ support) is to directly influence next year’s crucial UN climate meeting in Paris, when countries will try to conclude 20 years of fraught negotiations with a universal commitment to reduce emissions.”
–“the idea is to convene a meeting with leaders of the main religions to make all people aware of the state of our climate and the tragedy of social exclusion.”
–“Following a visit in March to Tacloban, the Philippine city devastated in 2012 by typhoon Haiyan, the pope will publish a rare encyclical on climate change and human ecology. Urging all Catholics to take action on moral and scientific grounds, the document will be sent to the world’s 5,000 Catholic bishops and 400,000 priests, who will distribute it to parishioners.”
–[SECONDARY MOTIVE FOR THE US VISIT: scheduled for next year in September]– Francis will meet other faith leaders and lobby politicians at the general assembly in New York IN SEPTEMBER, when countries will sign up to new anti-poverty and environmental goals.
=====
ORWELLIAN LANGUAGE:
–“, the pope has argued for a radical new financial and economic system to avoid human inequality and ecological devastation.”
” In October he told a meeting of Latin American and Asian landless peasants and other social movements: “An economic system centred on the god of money needs to plunder nature to sustain the frenetic rhythm of consumption that is inherent to it.” “The system continues unchanged, since what dominates are the dynamics of an economy and a finance that are lacking in ethics. It is no longer man who commands, but money. Cash commands.
“The monopolising of lands, deforestation, the appropriation of water, inadequate agro-toxics are some of the evils that tear man from the land of his birth. Climate change, the loss of biodiversity and deforestation are already showing their devastating effects in the great cataclysms we witness,” he said.”
–Sorondo said: “Just as humanity confronted revolutionary change in the 19th century at the time of industrialisation, today we have changed the natural environment so much. If current trends continue, the century will witness unprecedented climate change and destruction of the ecosystem with tragic consequences.”
“According to Neil Thorns, head of advocacy at Cafod, said: “The anticipation around Pope Francis’s forthcoming encyclical is unprecedented. We have seen thousands of our supporters commit to making sure their MPs know climate change is affecting the poorest communities.”
LikeLike