Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


6

By way of Rorate Caeli. (see here)

I am putting these two videos up for your information.

Please listen to them carefully. What we are witnessing is the end of not only the Francis pontificate but likewise the end of the Satanic Council itself.

The most important piece of information is in the 5/6 video at the very beginning, the first 10 minutes or so of the 6/6 video. I have transcribed here: (emphasis and added emphasis)

It means that there are now in the Church, so serious problems, so threatening problems for the existence of the Church, that the Congregation for the Faith is forced to revise their position with us. And to consider that, even if we say these problems are major, for them, they look minor, in comparison with the denying of the obligation of the morals. You say that you can give communion to divorced, so called remarried people, that’s a very, very serious thing that is opposed directly to Our Lord’s words. Our Lord’s words in the Holy Scripture. It’s a heresy. It is really hitting to the ground the Catholic doctrine. The Congregation for the Faith has to deal with these problems and they give the impression to put aside our problem. When in fact, already three years ago, Cardinal Muller told us in a meeting ‘ Your are occupying the Congregation of the Faith, you are obliging us to dedicate (?) to you such precious time while there are enormous problems in the Church’ So he was very unhappy to be dealing with us while there were enormous problems in the Church. At the time, I was not very happy about these things but with the time, with reflecting, yes they are facing enormous problems and suddenly what appeared to be the problem that is us, maybe it looks like a solution. And here you have to understand something, which is very, very interesting. The excesses of the present pope have caused a startled reaction. It’s open now. It’s no longer hidden, or let’s say for people like were hiding themselves, no you have cardinals, you have bishops who have openly contradicted these new tendency, this new tendency of hitting the morals and even the doctrine. We have counted that there are between 26 and 30 cardinals who have openly attacked these modern positions. And numerous bishops. They say that to the point that we have lost the monopoly on the contestation of the protest, til just a few years ago we were the only ones to state publicly these (to be) wrong. Now as they say, we have lost the monopoly of these attacks. You have various, they’re not uniform, so you have some which are more forceful, stronger, you have some that are a little weaker, some are broader but you have these… and it is very interesting because it is new, you didn’t have that. It’s a catastrophe for the Church, but it’s good, it’s good that finally there is a reaction. It’s high time. And this reaction is growing. And now you have to reflect. How can someone oppose the pope? We know, we have given the explanation. It’s not now. It’s (been) years that we explained why we have the right to do so. But these bishops and cardinals what their doing now must also reflect and have the right answer, how in in which name do they have the right to oppose the pope. The Holy Father. The one who’s under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. These are all  the arguments that they gave to us, to say you must obey. So under which name now they say: disobey. Well, there is only one answer. It’s because the Church in the past has already spoken about these things. And given the answer. And that’s what we call Tradition. Precisely that. In other words, the only reason to oppose is the attitude we have. And these people are intelligent they realize that in fact what we do is just the right thing. We’ve been told that at the last meeting of the Congregation of the Faith, where they all meet together, all the cardinals and bishops which are members, we call that a plenaria, this is the full meeting, there was only one cardinal who said, ‘no, no. no, the Society must absolutely accept the whole council’. And other voices who said ‘these people do only one thing, (that is) to repeat what the Church has always taught’. So you see, there is something on the move…                       

In last part of this transcribed passage, Bishop Fellay relates a meeting of the entire Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In that meeting, there was only one cardinal (see here) who insisted upon the doctrinal nature of the council, read Nostra Aetate. All the others supported the Archbishop Pozzo position that it is not necessary to accept this or any other heretical document to be a Faithful Catholic. Cardinal Burke has been the latest to support the Pozzo position. (see here)

The significance of this information (in the non transcribed part of the video) is that it clearly states that something has changed. We know that it is the Catholic Church’s relations with the other religions, i.e. Nostra Aetate that is presently propping up the entire rotten “new springtime of the spirit of Vatican II”.

Furthermore, it is the crux of this decision that Francis, bishop of Rome must make with respect to regularizing the SSPX. If he unilaterally accepts the SSPX, he will make enemies of not only the Jews, the Mohammedans, the Masons, cultural Marxists but rest of the anti-catholic world. But he needs a win on the “ecumenism front” and he needs on bad. (see here)

So these are the Known Knowns, as Donald Rumsfeld would say.

What appears to have changed now is this: regardless of whether Francis make that decision or not, it would appear that through his recklessness, the Catholic hierarchy has been forced to “see the light”. They have been forced into a position where they have to OPPOSE the sitting pontiff. Specifically, they must find the justification to OPPOSE Francis, the bishop of Rome. In order to do so, they have no other way to do it but along the lines of the SSPX approach. And not surprisingly, the ONLY answer is the one that Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X have been providing Modernist Rome since 1970.

Yet this SSPX approach entails one other integral component and that is the dismantling the the entire Satanic Council.

And this is just what happened.

Think about this for a second.

If the “new springtime of the spirit of Vatican II” has lost the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, it is toast. And that’s by definition.

Furthermore, Francis, through his heretical behavior has forced the issue to the forefront. It cannot be ignored nor denied any longer. And the mess that not only Francis, but the entire Ioannian/Pauline papal line has wrought onto the Catholic Church is so serious, that the younger hierarchy is being forced to ditch the entire VII NEO-MODERNIST EXPERIMENT™ altogether.

And there is no going back, nor is there any other way out.

So what we have in fact is reached the END GAME.

This could explain the various curious moves of high ranking prelates and the Pope “Emeritus” – whatever that is, that have been observed of late. But for now, I will leave off here.

So don’t turn that Bat dial!

PS Below is the last part of Bishop Fellay’s conference.

 

 

Update: 15:00 3 September 2016

Non SSPX French dioceses join SSPX Rosary Crusade

French Diocesan Priests Call Faithful to join SSPX Rosary Crusade (see here)

 

UPDATE 2: 15:24 3 September 2016

And then there is this.

They want off the plantation!

The “50 years” was the trigger word. Notice the parallels between Vatican II and the War Against Poverty.

Let’s call it a wider, interdisciplinary NORMALIZATION PROCESS™

UPDATE 3: 10:04  4 September 2016

Something that we have identified on the Deus Ex Machina Blog many, many moons ago is going Mainstream: (see here)

The Church is not split between traditionalists and progressives, but between Catholics and modernists.

– Don Nicola Bux

The first step in any problem resolution exercise is to properly define the problem. It would appear that this is finally happening.

Deo gratias!

Advertisements