Tags
Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, President Donald J. Trump, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s chastity belts, s Chlamydia trachomatis, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sBoris Johnson, sCatholic Church, sCavalcade of the Three Kings, sCryptosporidium, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Tags Catholic Church in Poland, TagsBREXIT, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, US Presidential Election 2016, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
Readers sometimes ask your humble blogger: chronicling the “register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind” the post conciliar church as you do, why are you so gosh-darned optimistic?
The reason my friends and dear readers is that I honestly believe that what the Catholic Church teaches, is the OBJECTIVE TRUTH. And using our intellect, or as our Faith notes the “light of reason”, we know that the OBJECTIVE TRUTH exists in the UNIVERSE and that we as humans have the God given ability to not only observe, identify and define it, but likewise to use it to advance the state of our existence.
Furthermore, the OBJECTIVE TRUTH that the Catholic Church teaches is nothing like anything else that any other “sect” teaches. What I mean by this is that if an alien landed on earth today, he would be catholic. He would be catholic since by him landing on earth (inter-planetary space travel), his civilization would have had to identify the same LAWS and PROCESSES that ours has. To be more precise, his civilization would have had to uncover a larger part of the et Invisibilium (see here) than our civilization has uncovered. The inference being that the alien’s civilization would have had to uncover a larger part of the et Invisibilium than ours, since our civilization still hasn’t advance to the point of putting a human on his planet, whereas theirs has.
So how does this relate to our present civilization, an specifically to the current FrancisBishop of Rome?
Simple. If you take a person who has had no contact with Catholicism, or who has had contact but has not obtained an understanding of what Catholicism entails, (cough, cough, FrancisBishop of Rome), this individual could become “catholic” just through the use of his intellect.
Furthermore, even the correctness of the supernatural part of the Catholic Faith can be discerned with nothing more than an open mind and a small measure of good will. Don’t believe me, please check out these two videos HERE and HERE which I have linked to in the right hand margin.
So whenever I come across another example of the OBJECTIVE CORRECTNESS of Catholicism, I make a note of it.
One thing that I try to do on this blog is to convey this to my readers, so that they can see for themselves, that there is solid, material evidence behind the notion that that which we call “human progress” is nothing more than the degree to which we have gotten to “know God”. In other words, the “degree of human progress” is nothing more than the “degree to which we as a civilization have gotten to know the et Invisibilium, i.e. the degree to which we become Catholic.
So today, I bring you more evidence that that which I have written above is CORRECT. What we see in the below story is an individual who has a problem with an IDEOLOGY. He realizes that the IDEOLOGY is FALSE, yet he has no tools to combat it. He searches and stumbles upon… Catholicism.
And the rest you can read below…
I am reposting this from the Life Site News website (original see here – emphasis added) and …
FOR THE RECORD
Prof who refuses to use gender pronouns points to Catholicism as bulwark against extremism
TORONTO, November 17, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Embattled Canadian free speech advocate and self-avowed political correctness opponent Jordan Peterson describes the Catholic Church as one of Western culture’s primary bulwarks against ideological extremism.
A well-known University of Toronto psychology professor, Peterson has challenged human rights laws and regulations as well as his university’s policies requiring the use of new pronouns demanded by people claiming to belong to one or many of the 50-plus new genders promoted by gender theory.
Peterson has refused to comply based on three grounds: there is no scientific evidence that any genders exist outside of male and female; there are too many new genders and pronouns like “zer” and “xe” to remember; and the requirement to use them is a huge imposition on freedom of thought and speech.
In a wide-ranging exclusive interview with LifeSiteNews, Peterson said religion in general and Catholicism in particular stand as a perpetual bulwark against ideologies of the political left or right, which is why the Catholic Church is under now attack by those ideologies — along with Dr. Peterson himself.
“The Catholic Church warns us against the danger posed by the un-moored rational mind,” said Peterson, who would not reveal his own religious beliefs. He added that religions in general provide a “balanced” and complete understanding of reality, while ideologies such as Fascism or Marxism (which he says lies at the root of gender theory) present a very narrow understanding.
Peterson said 19th century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche intended his statement, “God is dead,” as a warning against the atheism and nihilism of the Western intelligentsia. “When they lost faith in God died Marxism and then Nazism moved in to fill the void,” he told LifeSite.
The target of Peterson’s controversial YouTube videos — the mandatory acceptance of gender theory and polygender names and pronouns — is just the latest product of nihilism, he said.
Peterson has been accused of hate speech and asked to stop talking about gender by his university. He also has been shouted down at a free speech rally. But he has vowed to continue his campaign against mandatory polygenderism even if it leads to jail.
If he is called before the Ontario Human Rights Commission, he told LifeSiteNews that he would refuse to appear.
Peterson, an expert on the psychology of religion, is not a reductionist who believes his field says everything there is to know about it. That is an ideologue’s approach. Ideologies only describe part of reality but claim to tell it all, he says.
For Nazism, race is all that matters about a person. For Marxism, it is one’s relation to the “factors of production.” For gender and feminists, “It is about power.” One of today’s prevailing ideologies is environmentalism. “It depicts man as a corrupter and destroyer of nature and Western culture as pathological,” Peterson said. Political correctness is an expression of Marxism, depicting people as either victims or predators.
“Christianity tells a complete, balanced story. It describes humans as neither good nor bad, but capable of good and evil,” he said. “Nature brings pain and suffering but is the source of life.”
While ideology is the product of human thought — “un-moored reason,” Peterson believes religion evolved as human beings developed self-consciousness. Indeed, he believes the Biblical description of Adam and Eve acquiring the knowledge of good and evil is about how humans came to realize their own morality and vulnerability — and quickly put this knowledge to use manipulating and terrorizing others. “Animals do not torture each other,” he noted.
“One way to look at ideology is as an assault on the Logos,” he said, noting that Christians identify the Logos with Christ. “The Logos is the principle that brings order out of the chaos.” It also means absolute truth, but ideologies such as Nazism or Marxism do not believe there is even such as thing as truth. They will claim to be true whatever serves the cause of their ideology. “The Soviet Union was built on lies,” Peterson said.
Peterson bristles at the suggestion that religion is an ideology. “Anyone who says that doesn’t know anything about religion or ideology. “
Marek said:
Can you, please, write or post a link about this:
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/11/17/black-guelphs-matterpart1/
I know that it is not to me to decide who pope is but I cant ignore facts, and the facts I have problem with. In visibilium, is Pope who is seen as a Pope by world (cardinals) or is it strictly legal matter or something else.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
HI Mark,
I think Ann is spot on. My own position is here:
Hope this helps!
LikeLike
Marek said:
Thanks for link. I read through material on your blog and followed included links – good stuff but… it looks like State of Necessity (SoN) makes a good point in future argumentation for BXVI/Bergolio issue and, very likely, for annulment of whole Bergolio papacy (“papacy”).
How does it refers to me as a pew sitter? I’m obliged to know faith not canon laws. Based on my faith I may (SoN in action) leave Novus Ordo and follow SSPX. It is good to pray for Francis and it is duty to pray for Pope. Who is the Pope I have to pray for? I hear “Francis” in NO and SSPX says “Francis”, you (not personal) say “Benedict”. I’m not a canon lower nor are you but even if I hear from some clever lawyer that BXVI is the Pope, I bet I can find another one who, as clever as previous one arguments that Francis not Benedict is the real pope. So, it is I who have to make decision, but it is not up to me to decide who the Pope is…
I like Ann’s writing too but I see danger of closing up to sedevacantists position (I know her opinion here – my full agreement). The argument here is not that Pope’s teaching is not important, it is. The point is that Pope is not infallible, he can be wrong, can be even dangerous to Church but it is Magisterium Church follows (with the Pope) if any teaching contradicts Magisterium it should be rejected (even if it is Pope’s teaching). If God sent us Francis as a Pope, I will pray for him but will not follow him. “What happen if I pray for Francis and he isn’t pope? -Nothing. What if I wont? – God may zap me later for that.” So if God put Francis, or rather allow him to sit on Peters Chair, I will use this opportunity to straighten my faith resist false teachings and let God to solve problem how to go about next Pope.
In other words: If we assume that BXVI acted upon SoN (assumption that has a merit not only based on (intended) error but also on indications of “A resignation made out of grave fear”) why we conclude that tis SoN applies to each member of Church, and how I, a pew sitter, should recognize presence of this state in Church as reading of your (excellent) blog is not mandatory?
LikeLike
Wanda said:
As others have before him, Pope Francis is trying to put the square peg in the round hole. Stalin had to kill a lot of people over that and they still didn’t “get it”. In other words, the Pope refuses to accept the reality of the situation and proposes his own reality. Sorry, but it just doesn’t work like that. Worse yet, we are talking about the salvation of immortal souls, what is morally right and wrong, etc. Perhaps he forgot that I kinda doubt it..
LikeLike
dowd2015 said:
Can we conclude from the above statements that Pope Francis is either evil or crazy since. having been aware the truth of the Catholic Church, he has rejected it or failed to understand it? Put another way, Pope Francis has been blinded by pride and is leading the Church into a chasm.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Actually, the safer conclusion would be that he is, as the English would say: “thick”.
Personally, I think he is guy who is fascinated with the idea of “revolution”. It most likely has a romantic element built into the typical emotional South American/Latin psyche. You can see it in his interaction with Castro. It would appear that he is acting like a teenager who meets his idol. He is downright giddy.
LikeLike
dowd2015 said:
So basically you are saying he is immature and lives in a fantasy world. Perhaps so, but he is sure doing a lot of harm to people’s consciences, etc.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Definately detached from reality.
I also think he does have some mental issues, clinically speaking. But I don’t think he is full non compos mentis.
LikeLike