Tags
Catholic Church, Catholic Church in Poland, Cavalcade of the Three Kings, Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
The subject matter of the post below is something that I have been writing about in past posts. The ONE WORLD RELIGION is part of what is known as the United Nations Agenda 21 project.
The last post I put up on this was this one here: Thank God For Dunning-Kruger Types!
And now this below appears at Hilary White’s excellent blog What’s up with FrancisChurch?
If the information provided below is accurate, it means two things of the top of my head:
First it confirms that the Francis bishopric of Rome is coming to an end. Just as a reminder, here is how “Francis’ brain”, one Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez, who we have dubbed as the Loose Canon, presents “the game plan”:
When Francis says he will have a short pontificate doesn’t this help his adversaries?
“The pope must have his reasons, because he knows very well what he’s doing. He must have an objective that we don’t understand yet. You have to realize that he is aiming at a reform that is irreversible. If one day he should intuit that he’s running out of time and he doesn’t have enough time to do what the Spirit is asking him, you can be sure he will speed up.”
Please remember, Dunning-Kruger types like to boast about how smart they are. So what they will do is Signal what their plans are. It’s an inferiority complex thing. But I digress… What we might be a witness to is that Francis feels that his time is coming to an end. So he is “speeding up” his generation of novelties.
The second thing is this: I wonder if the Lutherans and other proddies know what Francis is up to?
Here is what I mean. In order to do a ONE WORLD RELIGION MERGER, one must assume that the “documentation” must be in place. On the other hand, I somehow wonder how they could have put the paperwork in place without word of this getting out. I mean, if for no other reason, the collection plate (revenue) sharing must be defined before the pen is put to paper.
And without some sort of a document, even if there is an “agreement in principle” in place, Francis has nothing. Legally speaking, that is.
And joint theological statements don’t count.
So the picture that is being presented is that this is a seat of the pants operation.
And even with everything that Francis has been able to get away with up to now, the novelties were not those that a neo-Modernist would consider of significant importance.
But now the situation is different.
Now we are talking about MONEY.
And that changes the dynamic!
I will leave off here to get this post up, but will have more to say about this as events progress…
Fra Cristoforo: Francis had plans with Clinton to “rehabilitate” Catholic non-negotiables “in a soft manner”
The Catholic TwittFace world is popping and sparking and buzzing and sizzling with this, like an Italian electrical socket.
This anonymous blog in Italian, clearly based in Rome, is the latest coolest thing among the Rome Vatican-watchers. There. Y’all’re running with the cool kids now!
(To head off the inevitable barrage of questions: no, I have no idea who he is.)
So far we’ve only had it in crappy Google-translate English. But a friend has helpfully helped to clarify the details with a good translation from the Italian original.
“Tip-offs III: the great “renewals” of Bergoglio” by Fra Cristoforo
Let me tell you a story. Last Thursday, in a coffee bar in front of the Porta S. Anna (facing Vatican City) a Monsignor (very close to Bergoglio) in his 50s and a layman go for a coffee. The discussion turns to the “dubia”.
The Monsignor, with an “enough” says: “The Pope will never answer the “dubia” of the 4 Cardinals. He will never lower himself to their level. Francis has much bigger plans, which do not stop with Italy. The only hitch during this period has been the election of Trump.”
To which the layman replied: “And what has Trump got to do with Amoris Laetitia?”
“He has everything to do with it” replied the Monsignor, continuing: “the aim was to back Clinton, because she has a special relationship with Francis. They’re in frequent contact. And the goal to be reached was that the Catholic Church was to rehabilitate certain “non negotiable” principles in a soft manner, in such a way that the Vatican too would have had strong global political support, which is needed at this time, above all for the big manoeuvres which are coming.”
About this we must agree with the great Assange… read here …
The layman even more amazed says: “And which manoeuvres are coming?”
The Monsignor sips the last drops of coffee and says: “But have you still not understood that the vision which you have of the Church has been left behind?
“…But do you not understand that today the Pope is a world leader? That had Ratzinger stayed we’d all be finished. Do you know what the next manoeuvre will be? Precisely the diaconate for women. Because it’s the only way to show our concrete closeness to the Lutherans and Anglicans. And you will see that by November we will have the diaconate for women. Not of course identical with what you think. But it will come very close.”
“BY NOVEMBER.”
~
There it is, in so many words what was said confidentially by the Monsignor of the Secretariat of State.
Now let us take a moment to reflect. Saint Peter’s Square is by this point almost always empty (and ‘Tv 2000’ only films that small group of people crowded together in front of the window.) What do the faithful matter to Bergoglio? From the contents of this conversation it can be inferred that the Argentinean has plans much broader than evangelisation. Often and willingly he has said that evangelisation is a form of proselytism, which is not OK. Just recently he even said that he is worried that in certain congregations there are many vocations.
There you are. He seeks only himself. He seeks to keep the spotlights on himself, and not to tread on anyone’s toes, because he is the LEADER.
And Jesus Christ does not concern him. How unlike St Paul. The Apostle to the gentiles said “we are become as the refuse of the world” (1 Cor 4,9-13) precisely because in first place he put evangelisation. Bergoglio instead, to the prejudice of Christ and of the salvation of souls, wants the first place for himself.
Dear readers, this is the reality. And in a week there will be more appalling news. But I won’t anticipate the press releases.
The reason behind my anonymity is this. I am a priest, but I HAVE TO be anonymous. Otherwise I would no longer have any way of writing these things to you. I have reflected on this a great deal in these last months. But I still cannot reveal myself publicly. I do however still think it important that the faithful “understand” the dynamics which are evolving in the See of Peter. And these discussions at the coffee bar are for me extremely relevant, and in conscience I have to communicate them to you.
Fra Cristoforo
And the question about the “bomb” Perp Francers is preparing for the “whole world” is running around Rome journalist circles. Everyone seems to be talking about “the big one,” though no one knows exactly what it’s supposed to be.
Personally, my money’s on an Ecumenical Council. Vatican III that his buddy Kasper has wanted all these years. But if this is true, there is an even bigger question. Councils aren’t just a happy little get-together. They always have a stated goal. They are called for particular ends.
It might be a good idea to ask ourselves, what could Jorge Mario Bergoglio want badly enough to call an Ecumenical Council to get?
What could he want that he does he not already have?
The Deus Ex Machina Blog 
Pingback: Canon212 Update: Fear on Christ’s Side and Desperation on the Devil’s – The Stumbling Block
@Bergoli-no: If, I may suggest to you, in charity, please listen very carefully, to the good Bishop Athanasius Schneider:
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/ NEW: Bishop Athanasius Schneider video interview……
……you’ll not hear pronouncements about Pope Francis, such as a heretic, nor, anti-pope. If you are a sedevacantist, reconsider your position, for the good of saving your soul.
Many Catholics, will have to answer to God for taking too much authority into their own hands. For deceiving, and confusing the weak, the scandalized, the lukewarm, the ignorant…even to the point of despair….Miserere!
THE HOLY MOTHER CHURCH IS ALIVE NOT DEAD! TRUST GOD!!!
LikeLike
>What could he want that he does he not already have?
A cooperative President of the United States for one thing. And thank Almighty God for that one!
Vatican is now run by faggots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Either Barnhardt is right or the Catholic Church does not and has never existed.
LikeLike
She’s a bit over the top… would be my observation.
LikeLike
She’ll be vindicated. Francis is an antipope. You have to willingly ignore things you see and hear from him to conclude otherwise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
…..continuation from “Peter, Lovest Thou Me?”
In 1983, in July, he (JPII) approved a mixed marriage; the couple had announced their intention to raise their children in the Anglican religion. “The marriage of Prince Michael of Kent, Anglican, and his wife, Catholic, is to be approved by Rome, five years after a civil ceremony. The couple will be renewing their vows before a Catholic priest. One their side, British religious authorities have made known that the marriage will soon be approved. The couple had announced their intention of raising their children in the Anglican faith. Paul VI had refused a dispensation to Baroness Marie-Christine von Reibnitz.” (La Croix’ of July 28, 1983).
In 1983, on December 11, for the first time in the history of the Roman Church, a Pope went to pray in a Lutheran temple, in Rome: “While the choir sang a Bach chorale, the Pope, with the single ornament of a violet stole, shook the hands offered him. Then he took a place in front of the altar, beside Pastor Christopher Meyer who presides at the Christuskirche. He then read a prayer for unity, composed by Luther, a prayer John Paul II had himself chosen from among the writings of the reformer……”
From the first months of his pontificate, on the occasion of his trip to Turkey, he draws the outlines of his ecumenical action regarding Moslems: “Today for you Christians, residing here in Turkey, if is your fate to live within the framework of a modern State which provides for the free expression of all faiths without identifying with any, and with men who in large majority, whilst not sharing the Christian faith, declare themselves ‘obedient to God,’ subject to God, and even ‘servants of God’ according to their own words, similar to those of St. Peter. They, like you have the faith of Abraham in the one and only God, all powerful, and merciful.”
“The faith in God that was professed by the spiritual descendants of Abraham, Christians, Moslems and Jews, when it is lived sincerely, when it penetrates one’s life, is an assured foundation for the dignity, fraternity and liberty of men and a principle of rectitude for the moral conduct and life in society. I wish to profit by this encounter….to ask you to consider each day the deep roots of faith in God in which the Moslems, your fellow citizens believe, so as to draw from that a principle of co-operation regarding men’s progress, of striving for good, and the extension of peace and brotherhood in the free profession of faith proper to each.” (D C December 16, 1979, p. 1052).”
“This is a far cry from the teaching of St. Pius X: ‘THERE IS ONLY ONE HUMAN DIGNITY AND THAT IS CATHOLIC DIGNITY.’ The Pope wants us to believe that man can obey God without wanting to serve Jesus Christ; that Moslems can grow in virtue to the same extent as Christians (which is moreover contradicted by the facts for the vast majority of the disciples of Mohammed).”
JESUS CHRIST IS NOT OPTIONAL!!!
LikeLike
The following quotations are taken from a book by Father Maliński (Mon Ami, Karol Wojtyła’ Le Centurion 1980), in which he describes his interviews with Cardinal Wojtyła in Rome, in 1963. “The convoking of a Council and its preparations have had an unexpected result. In less than four years, the interior situation in the Church has changed in unbelievable fashion. Everywhere in the Catholic world fervent voices have been raised to demand a new approach to evangelism. A new climate, born of a reciprocal wish, has been born in relations between the various Christian Churches. No other Council had such a great preparation, never was such a ample founding of Catholic opinion made. Not only bishops, Catholic universities and the General Superiors of religious congregations have expressed their opinions on the subject of Council problems, but also a large percentage of lay Catholics, and even non-Catholics. Such eminent theologians as Henri de Lubac. J. Danielou, Y. Congar, H. Kung, R. Lombardi, Karl Rahner and others have play an extraordinary role in the work of the preparation.
“The object of John XXIII was above all the unity of Christians; giant steps have been made along this road. The Church is persuaded, as never before, that what unites Christians is stronger than what divides them. The yearning for unity of Christians joins hands with the wish for the unity of all the human race. The new conception of the idea of the people of God has replaced the old truth on the possibility of redemption outside the visible bounds of the Church. This premise shows the attitude of the Church towards the other religions, which is the basis for recognizing values which are spiritual, human and Christian at once, extending to religions such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism….The Church wishes to undertake a dialogue with representatives of these religions. Here Judaism occupies a particular place. The draft of the future Declaration will speak clearly of the spiritual unity between Christians and Jews……..
Further on we find proposed revelations on the orientation of the Council, and the future of the Church: “Above all, it acted to restore the authority of each bishop and promoted the decentralization inside the Church, thus the return of the principle of collegiality, revision of pastoral methods to maintain their vigor, and now introducing new methods and forms, sometimes quite audacious. There is also the question of the universality of the Church; it means a changing of attitude towards ancient cultures of people who are non-European. It is necessary to de-westernize Christianity. People with an ancient culture find barriers only explained by psychology against Christianity; they are presented with European trappings! Africanisation, Indianisation, Japanisation etc., is seen as necessary. ……It is the end of the era of Constantine, characterized by firm agreement between altar and throne, between Church and State, brought to the highest point by the birth of the Holy Roman Empire in the ninth century. We face a grave problem! Working out a new relations between Church and State, the rights of the Church, and religious liberty. Going further, one must speak of re-evaluating the place of the laity in the Church, and then developing ecumenical themes on a scale previously unknown in the history of the Church.”
“At the end of Wednesday’s General Audience, to hasten the outcome of the Middle East conflict, John Paul II invoked, no doubt unconsciously, the revolutionary trilogy ‘liberty, equality, fraternity’ (gift to the misery of the world from French Revolution, my emphasis): “Jerusalem must become the city of man, in which the believers of the three great monotheistic religions – Christianity, Judaism and Islam – live in full liberty and equality, as do the believers of other religious communities, in the recognized guarantee that this city is the sacred patrimony of all, and is destined for the adoration of the One God, of meditation and the work of fraternity.” (La Croix’ of September 17, 1982, p. 3).
HOW FAR THIS IS FROM THE CRUSADING SPIRIT OF A SAINT BERNARD!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let us take ‘the ax to the root!’ The creation of the programme for today……
…..excerpts from “Peter, Lovest Thou Me?” by Abbe Daniel Le Roux:
“Liberty of conscience has ended in political liberty. From the middle of the 19th century the Popes have been issuing severe warnings against this secularism.
Pope Gregory XVI warned: “It is always true that indifferentism in matters of religion is the surest road leading people to political liberalism.” (Encyclical ‘Inter praecipuas’ of May 8, 1844). Two centuries of revolutions have proved right the Bishop of Poitiers and illustrated the celebrated formula of Chesterton: “Remove the supernatural, and what remains in unnatural.”
“In his work ‘Une main cachee dirige, (A Hidden Hand Directs), Jacques Bardiot explains that the role of the United Nations follows, in a world disfigured by the aftermath of war, its unfortunate predecessor, the League of Nations, which orders in fact, the progressive setting up of a “One World Government”. The United Nations Charter has this as its aim, ‘the suppression of national armed forces, replacing them by a single United Nations Peace-keeping force.’ (Hidden Hand Directs).
“This project is supported by top International Finance, notably by the Council for Foreign Relations. This organization of businessmen and American politicians gives its support to “Soviet Communism for the destruction of all regimes and all existing social structure, an indispensable preliminary to the establishment of the One World Government.”
The future Pope Pius XII: “I hear around me reformers who want to dismantle the Holy Sanctuary, destroy the universal flame of the Church, to discard all her adornments, and smite her with remorse for her historic past. Well, my dear friend (speaking to Count Enrico Pietro Galeazzi), I am convinced that the Church of Peter must assume responsibility for her past, or she will be digging her own grave……A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God, that His Son is merely a symbol a philosophy held by so many others, and in the churches Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them, like Magdalen weeping before the empty tomb, ‘Where have they taken Him?” (Mgr. Roche and P. Saint Germain: ‘Pie XII devant l’histoire’ pp. 52-53).
LikeLike
I dare say Pope Francis views the Catholic Church as something to be destroyed and remade in his image. He ignores the Divine origins to his detriment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds like Pope Francis views the mission of the Catholic Church as a spiritual blender in which are other religions are poured into and homogenized into a Freemason mixture of secular values, social justice initiatives and sentimental spirituality in order to serve the New World Order.
LikeLiked by 1 person