Tags
Cavalcade of the Three Kings, Chapel of the Holy Trinity, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch
In today’s post we skip back to the Restoration theme. Over at the American Thinker, a post appeared titled Mater Si, Magistra No: Renewal of Tradition in the Catholic Church, written by Mr. Paul Ingrassia.
This post contains several key DATA POINTS, which is why I am bringing it to your attention. Among those key DATA POINTS are:
- The Restoration is real, taking place and a good thing.
- The “Francis” as well as the entire “new springtime” experience has been a complete bust. (last paragraph)
- Only way forward is to return to Tradition.
- Catholicism (Tradition) will become the largest movement within the Catholic Church in the not too distant future.
NOTE BENE, and a big one. In the text, we find this passage:
And while it would be unwise to ascribe a cause-and-effect relationship between Mass attendance and Vatican II, it is nevertheless indisputable that Christianity in the Western world is currently experiencing an existential crisis as people everywhere – particularly the young – abandon organized religion in droves.
Readers of this blog know why, yes?
For the new readers, allow me to explain.
We know from the seminal work of Dr. John Lamont that protestantism is a mixture of positive and negative theology. The negative theology is an anti-Catholicism that needs Catholicism in order to exist. The analogous situation in the biological sciences would be the relationship between the parasite needing the host.
Or to put it another way, with a protestantized NUChurch, there is nothing to “protest” any longer.
On the other hand, the positive theology aspects are very weak. Too weak in fact to sustain protestantism in and of itself. Hence a rapid disintegration of the Catholic Church leads to an even greater disintegration of the prostestant sects.
Numquam Ponenda est Pluralitas Sine Necessitate
And now for the article that appeared on the American Thinker… (see here and emphasis added.)
Mater Si, Magistra No: Renewal of Tradition in the Catholic Church
It has been over a half-century since the closure of the Second Vatican Council, which ran in multiple sessions from 1963 to 1965 under the papacies of Pope Saint John XXIII and Pope Paul VI. Vatican II, as the ecumenical council is colloquially known, is considered the defining moment of the Church in the twentieth century. The council brought forth historic change to the Roman Catholic Church, fundamentally altering the liturgy and dispensing with centuries of tradition to appease a world society that had freshly emerged from the two deadliest conflicts in human history.
The council, which sought to rigorously examine the challenges that had long plagued the Church in the modern era, was the impetus behind the liberalization of the Catholic Church. The Council Fathers sought to transfer the focus of the liturgical movement from the priests to the laity, ascribing renewed significance to the congregation. This coincided with a movement away from Latin to the vernacular. The way the documents of Vatican II were written allowed practitioners of the Novus Ordo Mass, promulgated by Pope Paul VI, to replace Gregorian Chant with secular religious hymns, thus making the latter the predominant musical tradition.
This and other reforms accelerated the overhaul of traditional customs and likewise reflected the Church’s growing aloofness to such things as doctrinal orthodoxy and traditional morality. In keeping with the stylistic changes of the liturgy and the theological approach of aggiornamento, a “bringing up to date,” Church architecture, particularly over the past half-century, has been compromised by the spirit of Vatican II. Grandiose cathedrals that once towered over cities and reached toward heaven have been replaced by pedestrian structures devoid of the Romanesque and Gothic elements that in years past fostered the allure and mystique of the Catholic Church. The interiors underwent a similar transformation: tabernacles were, in many cases, relegated to side alcoves, and the centerpiece crucifix was replaced by a resurrected Christ or a barren cross, indistinguishable from Protestant symbolism.
In addition to the liturgical alterations, the rites of the seven sacraments were subject to considerable revision. Traditional vestments were dispensed with, and the regalia of the papal coronation, such as the sporting of the papal tiara, last worn by Pope Paul VI in 1963, was indefinitely retired. Priests have also moved away from the Tridentine custom of celebrating Mass ad orientem (facing “liturgical east,” or toward the high altar), instead opting for the more personalized versus populum (facing the congregation), which was consistent with the Church’s pivot toward personalized morality and emphasis on self-fulfillment over set dogma.
Perhaps the most salient change is the Second Vatican Council’s commitment to ecumenism. Keeping in line with its desire to democratize and reconcile longstanding theological rifts in a rapidly globalizing world, the ecumenical reforms were met with varying degrees of success. In this respect, the Council Fathers had hoped to reorient the Church’s perspective to highlight the shared orthodoxies between the Catholic Church and other faiths, a departure from its former practice of highlighting the deviations among other denominations. Some traditionalists viewed these unprecedented measures with horror, believing the Church to have completely abandoned centuries of tradition. But the Council Fathers reiterated that no doctrinal changes had been made; the Council’s chief aim was to democratize and appease a modernizing world, not surrender to it.
Over a half-century later, it remains unclear just how successful the Council was in achieving its goals and to what extent the ensuing history of the Church is incumbent upon Vatican II reforms. Some traditionalists cite the vibrant state of the Church prior to the Council’s formation in many parts of the world – notably, the United States, Canada, and many parts of Eastern and Southern Europe. Today, Mass attendance in all these regions – particularly those bereft of a prevailing Protestant subculture – has dropped precipitously, suggesting a failure of the Council to deliver on its goals. Incidentally, Mass attendance in the United States has declined as well – approximately three in four practicing Catholics attended Mass on a regular basis prior to Vatican II, whereas now, participation hovers around twenty to twenty-five percent. To some, this is vindication that the Church must restore many of its former traditions or risk annihilation altogether. And while it would be unwise to ascribe a cause-and-effect relationship between Mass attendance and Vatican II, it is nevertheless indisputable that Christianity in the Western world is currently experiencing an existential crisis as people everywhere – particularly the young – abandon organized religion in droves.
Perhaps the most disheartening case of this is the devitalized state of the Irish Catholic Church, which, for centuries, had provided the cultural foundation of one of the most Catholic countries in Europe. Today, Mass attendance barely exceeds thirty percent and remains in decline. This figure is less than a third of its 1950 participation rate and, by some estimates, is markedly lower than in countries that do not have a traditionally Catholic heritage, such as the United States. The long-term results of this wholesale secularization are not yet fully understood. However, the fact that Ireland redefined marriage in 2015 by popular referendum in an attempt to include same-sex couples suggests a certain permanence to these trends, at least for the foreseeable future. Granted, the Catholic Church remains an integral part of Irish society, but its influence has waned considerably in the past few decades, setting the stage for a renewed debate of once untouchable issues like abortion and euthanasia.
The problems facing the Catholic Church in Ireland are very much interrelated with the problems affecting the Catholic Church globally; the former is a concrete derivative of a systemic issue whose origins trace back to the fallout of the Council itself. Some, including Pope Paul VI and Pope Benedict XVI, maintained that it was not Vatican II, strictly speaking, that caused the crisis of the modern Church, but rather how the Council was subsequently misconstrued by the burgeoning news media and leftist academicians. Considering the liberal climate of the late 1960s, there is little doubt that the cultural changes of that era impacted the interpretation of the Council. This, in conjunction with the evolving media climate, in which biased journalists labeled the Council Fathers as winners and losers depending on their philosophy, furthered the confusion about the Council’s implications. In recognizing this, some blame can still be accorded to those who backed the Council for haphazardly calling for its creation without accounting for the cultural changes that would invariably dint its rollout, regardless of whatever the actual outcome was.
Ultimately, whether or not the Council accelerated today’s lack of religiosity is secondary to the larger premise that the modern Church was, in fact, greatly shaped by Vatican II reforms. Knowing this, it would be wise for Church officials to gradually roll back many of the liturgical changes and work toward implementing a more traditionalist platform. Pope Benedict XVI appeared to sympathize with traditionalists in expressing during his papacy that liberals had wrongly interpreted Vatican II by objecting to such reforms as pushing back against local suppression of the Latin Mass, in addition to smaller reforms, like reviving several papal garments that had fallen into disuse. Although these efforts were rather diminutive in theological significance, they nevertheless signaled that the Vatican was at least open to the idea of bringing tradition back to the Catholic Church.
So where left to go for the surviving religious hoping for a grand awakening of their faith?
Some, like Rod Dreher (who left the Catholic Church for Eastern Orthodoxy), believe that a new “dark ages” have befallen contemporary civilization and that the best way to manage the situation is for the remaining few Christians to organize into monastic communities of believers removed from the moral decay of modern times. This so-called “Benedict Option,” named for St. Benedict of Nursia (ca. 480-537), is tailored for Americans who wish to preserve genuine Christian culture by displacing themselves from a society that is in its current state outwardly hostile to the Christian faith. Essentially, the debauchery of American civilization has reached a point of no return, forcing the few devout remaining to withdraw from the world, if not physically, then at least spiritually, into true communities of faith that will uphold the principles of the Church and form a “living spiritual relationship with God.”
Others have advocated for less drastic measures, though a common pessimism about the degraded state of Western civilization appears to unify many traditionalists. Indeed, there is a clear metaphysical crisis working to dismember any form of objective truth or attach genuine significance to the human person. Above all, the effects of modernity have reduced the dignity of the modern man into nothing beyond a baseless social construct contingent on no substantive higher moral truth. The horrible eventualities that might result from such spiritual lethargy are, at present, unknown.
Christians should hope that at some point in the future, the truths embedded in the writings of such distinguished theologians as Benedict XVI may ignite an awakening of the Logos and a renewal of faith founded in the memoria Ecclesiae, the memory of the Church. Tracey Rowland, writing for the Catholic Herald, put it this way:
When a new generation arises in full rebellion from the social experiments of the contemporary era, craving a human ecology that respects both God and nature, and wanting to be something more than rootless cosmopolitans, Ratzinger’s publications will serve as Harry Potter-style Portkeys, giving creative young rebels access to the missing cultural capital – indeed, access to what Ratzinger calls the memoria Ecclesiae.
So long as current trends continue, traditional Catholics may ultimately become the Church’s most prominent voice, if for no reason other than that they will be the only ones remaining, thereby forcing it into this direction by default. Naturally, Catholics should hope it doesn’t reach this point, but considering that the updated papal idiom of Pope Francis did not usher a wave of disaffected Catholics back into the Church, it seems that a reversal of course might actually be a good thing. The Church would be well advised to stop pandering to lapsed Christians, and instead to strengthen its resolve on doctrine and tradition, especially given the alarming trend of moral relativism among younger people in particular, which is grossly incompatible with the objectivism espoused by Catholic doctrine. A more reverend, disciplined, and ordered Church might ultimately precipitate a rekindling of the Catholic faith and shift the emphasis away from the material and personal and toward the metaphysical and divine.
Mark Thomas said:
For century upon century, “Tradition” was in place throughout the Church. That didn’t prevent millions of Catholics from having abandoned the Faith. That didn’t prevent the Arian Crisis, split between the Eastern and Western Churches, Protestant Revolt, or the rise of Modernism that had spread throughout the Church just prior to Vatican II.
To even begin to “return to Tradition,” at least as I understand that phrase, the Church would, in effect, be forced to repudiate one Papal act after another that had been enacted Pope Venerable Pius XII to date.
The 20th Century “liberalization” of the Church was underway in earnest years prior to Vatican II.
It was Pope Venerable Pius XII who, in major fashion, initiated the process that “modernized” the Church. Pope Venerable Pius XII opened the door to…
— Catholic participation in the Ecumenical Movement. (He declared that the Holy Ghost had inspired the Ecumenical Movement.)
— Modernized Catholic Biblical studies.
— Instituted radical liturgical reforms. He tapped, among other progressives, Monsignor Bugnini to develop radical liturgical reforms. In turn, Pope Venerable Pius XII enacted said reforms.
— Opened the door to the vernacularization of the Mass. (For that matter, during the 1960s, even Archbishop Lefevbre called for the vernacularization of the Mass of the Catechumens.)
— Instituted radical reforms in regard to fasting.
— Threw the Church’s weight behind the United Nations Organization. Pope Venerable Pius XII called upon nations to surrender armaments to the UN.
— Insisted that the Church must adapt Herself to modern times and conditions.
Therefore, to “return to Tradition,” the Church would be forced to overthrow the direction in which She has travelled from the Pontificate of Pope Venerable Pius XII.
However, Holy Mother Church is not about to repudiate, in effect, Her Pontificates from Pope Venerable Pius XII to date.
Pope Venerable Pius XII insisted that his reforms were in continuity with Holy Tradition. Each Pope claims that for himself.
At the very least, the process to “return to Tradition” would prove gut-wrenching as the Church would be required to repudiate one reform after another that She enacted from Pope Venerable Pius XII’s Pontificate to date.
That, in turn, would unleash massive infighting within the Church. You think that the Church is in chaos today…well, just wait…
I favor the restoration of the Traditional Roman Mass. However, the program (as I understand things) that so-called “Traditionalists” favor — the so-called “return to Tradition” — would prove difficult to enact.
Again, even when the TLM was in place, the Church experienced massive problems and confusion…and Popes, enacted radical reforms that they claimed were in line with Holy Tradition.
The Church is not about to return to an earlier time. She has never conducted Herself in that fashion. Holy Mother Church moves forward.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
“…whoever is holy cannot dissent from the Pope.”
— Pope Saint Pius X, 1912 A.D..
LikeLike
Mark Thomas said:
Among the questions associated with the “return to Tradition” notion is the following:
To what “tradition” do we return?
The ancient tradition in regard to Confession is to assign lengthy penances to a sinner. Would so-called “traditionalists” accept the restoration of severe penance assigned to a penitent?
The Low Mass is at odds with the Church’s ancient liturgical tradition. Liturgy celebrated to the hilt, opposite of the Low Mass mentality, is the authentic ancient Church tradition. Are “traditional” Catholics who favor the Low Mass willing to consign Low Mass to history?
Do “traditionalists” desire to return to ancient, traditional stringent fasting practices?
The ancient, authentic tradition is to allow laymen to participate directly in the elections of Popes and bishops. Do “traditionalists” wish to restore that ancient traditional practice?
Are “traditionalists” willing to abandon such innovations as the use of musical instruments during Mass…the praying of the Rosary during Mass…the use of pews…?
The reality is that the Church has always maintained the True Faith which, in turn, She has manifested in various ways throughout the centuries.
The phrase “return to Tradition” lacks precision.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
LikeLike
Wanda said:
“The horrible eventualities that might result from such spiritual lethargy are, at present, unknown.” Not at all true. Alexander Solzhenitsyn left us an incredible legacy of just what to expect as he, and millions alike, suffered under atheistic communism. The current zeitgeist has reduced humanity to nothing more than a commodity, to be used or abused by those who can do so. Any revival of Tradition will, IMHO, come about by preaching the Truth, in season and out, on street corners if necessary. St. Fidelis of Sigmaringen, whose feast day is today, showed the power of preaching — even unto death.
LikeLike
Mark Wauck said:
Let’s see …
Ratzinger aka Benedict recently came out of his cloister to appear with Francis and to talk about “cosmic transubstantiation,” a favorite topic for him over the years. That’s the voice of tradition? I point this out to indicate just how dire the state of the Church is, how unable to recognize the Apostolic Tradition, when a figure like Ratzinger can be perceived as an upholder of Tradition, rather than what he was at Vatican II and still is.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
It’s a process…
LikeLike
Pingback: Mater Si, Magistra No: Renewal of Tradition in the Catholic Church |
Michael E. Dowd said:
Thank you Sam. Paul Ingrassia summarized the current state of affairs in the Church very well. His conclusion that Catholic Traditionalism is the only answer to revival and survival is clearly correct.
LikeLiked by 2 people
S. Armaticus said:
There is a consensus building…
LikeLike