, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Today your humble blogger turns his gaze on the other, non-Chilean Francis victims, some presently coming into the public spotlight, such as those in China, and others not so much, such as those in Venezuela. Not to mention the Middle Eastern Christians who are completely ignored by the bishop of Rome and his cabal.

One long running theme of this blog is that Francis and his entourage are nothing more than a bunch of leftist thugs. The leftism, from what we all have been able to observe is pure opportunism. Evidence… bah PROOF of this can be readily seen when looking at how Francis acts around… say President Trump, or the documents he signs when he is around the Moscow Patriarch Kyrill (see here).

As to the thuggery, this is part of the Francis entourage’s DNA that is natural and the common denominator of all those who Francis calls his comrades or brothers-in-arms presently.

A good case in point of just this is Francis’ moral and maybe even financial support for the murderous regime run by the thugs in the FrancisRepublic of Venezuela. The most recent news coming from Venezuela is that governmental organs of the FrancisPresident Maduro had executed a “rogue” group of police officers who had earlier surrendered. Their “rogue” status originated from the fact that these police officers didn’t want to shoot at their unarmed fellow countrymen. And this “nuance” is something that apparently “escapes” Francis and his Team. Here is the screen grab from our friendly catholic Zero Hedge website:

And here is the back-story to how the FrancisChurch and the wider post-conciliar church has created the Francis”Lio” in Venezuela.

So moving on to China, below is a re-post from the Vox Cantoris website. Vox has this information and more on his page here.

This is a very sad situation on many levels, the political aspect is actually one of the lesser ones. For those not following China, there are reportedly 60 million Catholics (correction) Christians in China. Catholicism is being brutally suppressed by the Communist state.

The reason being that Catholicism is spreading among the population and beginning to supplant the indigenous Confusionism that is the real “philosophical” backbone of Chinese society. As my readers know, Marxism is an ideology and is not able to sustain a societal structure in the medium or longer term. Case in point, USSR.

So what we see happening in China, is that the Chinese Communists have allowed Confusionism to reassert itself in order to stabilize societal structures, which then made the maintenance of power of the Chinese Communist Party easier. Yet, since Catholicism is making such significant inroads into Chinese society, it has become paramount for the Chinese authorities to gain control over the Catholic Church in China, an organization presently controlled by a foreign entity, i.e. The Vatican.

Going forward, no doubt that this “re-engagement” of Communist China by the FrancisVatican will be spun as a great “ecumenical” rapprochement and on a historical level as the President Nixon China visit. This could not be further from the truth. What is happening effectively is that FrancisChurch is helping the Chinese Communists to stop the spread of Catholicism in China. To be more specific, the type of Catholicism that they can’t control. In other words, the Catholicism in the territories that FrancisChurch can’t control through their proxies at the UN and the One World Order.

This is the backstory to what is happening on this FrancisFront. 

Please read the information on the Vox Cantoris blog.

I will leave off with the comment I made on the Deus ex Machina twitter feed of the OPTICS of what is the OBJECTIVE REALITY behind what is transpiring right before our very eyes:


The Vatican asks legitimate bishops to step aside in favour of illegitimate ones

John Baptist Lin

Last December, Mgr Peter Zhuang Jianjian of Shantou (Guangdong) was forced to go to Beijing where “a foreign prelate” from the Vatican asked him to leave his see to illicit bishop Joseph Huang Bingzhang. He had received the same request last October. Mgr Joseph Guo Xijin, ordinary bishop of Mindong, is expected to become the auxiliary or coadjutor of illicit Bishop Vincent Zhan Silu. Sinicizing the Chinese Church means supporting the principle of independence and follow the leadership of the Communist Party.

Guangzhou (AsiaNews) – The Holy See has asked Bishop Peter Zhuang Jianjian of Shantou in southern Guangdong province to retire in order to give way to an excommunicated bishop while another Vatican-appointed bishop was asked to downgrade himself as the assistant of an illicit bishop.

This is the second time in three months that the Holy See made the resignation demand on Bishop Zhuang, who was secretly ordained in 2006 with Vatican approval. However, he is only recognized as priest by the Chinese government, which on the other hand is in full support of the excommunicated Bishop Huang Bingzhang, a long-time member in the National People’s Congress, China’s parliament.

A letter dated 26 October demanded the 88-year-old bishop to resign to give way to the excommunicated bishop, whom the Holy See is going to recognize. “Bishop Zhuang at that time refused to obey and rather ‘carry His Cross’ for being disobedience,” a church source in Guangdong who asked not to be named told Asia News.

In the latest incident, Bishop Zhuang was escorted to Beijing 18-22 December from his southern diocese to meet some senior officials from the central government and a delegation from the Vatican, according to the church source.

Before the trip, the officials began to monitor Bishop Zhuang on 11 December. Even knowing the bishop was not in good health and the weather was freezing in Beijing, they rejected his demand not to go to northern China but sent a doctor along. A total of seven local government officials went along with Bishop Zhuang but no priest was allowed to follow him, the source said.

Staying at the Huguosi Hotel in Beijing, Bishop Zhuang was taken to sightseeing on 19 December and then to the headquarters of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA) and the bishops’ conference the next day, where he met with Bishops Ma Yinglin, Shen Bin and Guo Jincai, the president, vice president and secretary general of the bishops’ conference respectively, the source continued.

The CCPA and bishops’ conference, as well as Ma and Guo, two illicit bishops, are not yet recognized by the Holy See.

On 21 December, Bishop Zhuang was taken to the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse. He was first greeted by three officials from the State Administration for Religious Affairs. Then he was led by Fr Huang Baoguo, a Chinese priest who is serving at the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, to meet with a foreign bishop and three foreign priests from the Vatican.

Since China and the Vatican resumed official contact in 2014, Archbishop Claudio Maria Celli, a veteran in China Church affairs, is known to be responsible for the negotiations and has been in China several times for this purpose. It is believed the prelate whom Bishop Zhuang met is Archbishop Celli.

The foreign bishop explained the aim of their travel to China was to do something in order to reach understanding with the Chinese government, and that is to let Bishop Huang to become the legitimate bishop of the diocese, the source said.

The Holy See delegation demanded Bishop Zhuang to retire just as what was in the letter dated Oct 26 but with one addition term seems to console the elderly bishop, and that is, he could nominate three priests for Bishop Huang to pick one as his vicar general, the source continued.

“Bishop Zhuang could not help his tears on hearing the demand,” the source said, adding that “it was meaningless to appoint a vicar general, who is still a priest that Bishop Huang could remove him anytime.”

Some bishops in southern China opposed the idea of hastily recognizing Bishop Huang, who was officially excommunicated by the Holy See in 2011 when he accepted illicit episcopal ordination without papal mandate. One of the bishops who asked not to be named told Asia News that the Vatican has asked for their opinions. “I did not know the outcome, but this is a bad solution,” he said.

AsiaNews also asked the Vatican for confirmation of the situation in Shantou. A representative familiar with the China dossier said that the letter Mgr Zhuang received was just a request for opinion on the illicit bishop Mgr Huang. Another figure has been silent. Card Joseph Zen, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong, confirmed the information obtained by AsiaNews.

The Mindong affair

While Bishop Zhuang was summoned to freezing Beijing, the Vatican delegation reportedly went southward to eastern Fujian province to meet with Bishop Vincent Zhan Silu, one of the seven illicit bishops awaiting the Vatican to recognize.

Local sources said Bishop Joseph Guo Xijin, the ordinary bishop of Mindong belonging to the underground community, was asked to downgrade himself as assistant of Bishop Zhan, with one of the sayings was that he has to downgrade to become a coadjutor bishop.

One of the sources said, signing a document to accept “voluntary” downgrading himself as the coadjutor bishop was also one of the conditions the government officials put forward to Bishop Guo in order to recognize him when he was under one-month detention before the Holy Week in 2017.

Bishop Zhan declined to confirm the meeting or disclose details about his recognition progress with the Holy See. He only told Asia News that the Vatican and Chinese officials have regular meetings regarding the negotiations.

An underground priest in Mindong said he did not know about the Vatican delegation’s visit. “We of course feel hard to accept but do we have the rights to oppose the Vatican?” he said, but adding that if thing goes that way, “I may consider to quit and leave my priesthood.”

Though the news of downgrading the status of a bishop seems extraordinary or unbelievable in the universal Church, it is not surprising in China. For last October, General Secretary Xi Jinping’s work report in the opening session of the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party called for “new approaches” adopted for works related to ethnic and religious affairs.

An earlier article on Qiushi, a top-level journal on Communist theory run by the Party’s Central Committee, published on 15 September also carried the title “Theory and Innovative Practice on Religious Work since the 18th National Congress of the CPC” in 2012.

Though without clear elaboration on what will be the innovative practice to the Catholic Church, the CCPA and the bishops’ conference have passed a five-year plan to “sinicize” the Catholic Church on 14 December. The direction of “Sinicization of religion” is a term first mentioned by Xi Jinping in the Central United Front Work Meeting in 2015. The gist is to demand all religions to uphold an independent principle and followed the leadership of the Community Party.

For the Holy See to recognize seven illicit bishops (originally eight but one died in 2017), among whom Bishop Huang and two others were publicly excommunicated by the Holy See, is part of the thorny issues to resolve in China-Vatican negotiations. In exchange, China would have to recognize about 20 bishop candidates appointed by the Holy See, with some even secretly ordained already, for the open Church community in recent years, as well as close to 40 bishops in the underground community.

According to an article by Cardinal John Tong in 2017, the core problem to be resolved in closed-door negotiations between China and the Vatican is the appointment of bishops.