Tags
#fakenews, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germania Delenda Est!, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Re-Traditionalization, Refugee Resettlement Watch blog, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s Ann Corcoran, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags #fakenarratives, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, Zombie, ZombieBishop, ZombieChurch Busy day
Michael is hitting his stride!
On a similar note, below is the latest Brandon Smith post on narcissistic sociopaths, a.k.a globalists, which quite neatly summurizes our very own diabolical narcissist of Rome.
For those who follow my blog, you will recall that according to the Lex Armaticus, the scientific field of ontology can be divided into three sub-categories: the natural, supernatural and the conscience. All academic knowledge can be interpreted through these three “lenses” since all human knowledge contains these three elements. Aside, yes there is a metaphysic component to the equation of 2+2=4.
Given the hermeneutic above, the below post by Brandon Smith can be seen as the Natural side analysis of the diabolical narcissist examination expounded by Ann Barnhardt (see here) who approaches the subject matter more from the supernatural angle.
Please read at your leisure.
Have a great weekend…
*****
The Ultimate Goal Of Globalists Is To Make You Into A Monster Just Like Them
Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
In recent months I have been writing extensively about the psychology of globalists as well as the strange cult-like beliefs that drive their philosophies. In my article ‘Global Elitists Are Not Human’ I outlined evidence that globalist motives and behavior are directly comparable to the ideals and behavior of narcissistic sociopaths (or what some people might refer to as psychopaths). I theorized that globalists are in fact a highly organized cult of narcissistic sociopaths, that they look for the inborn character trait of sociopathy in the people that they recruit, and that these people are like a separate species from normal human beings, as they lack most traits that we would associate with normal human behavior such as empathy and self examination.
In my article ‘Luciferianism: A Secular Look At A Destructive Globalist Belief System’, I showcased evidence that globalists and their institutions (like the United Nations) were tied to the luciferian philosophical cult. I also explored my epiphany that luciferianism was actually a religion designed by narcissistic sociopaths for narcissistic sociopaths; a belief system that exonerates and applauds their destructive behaviors.
To reiterate, the only way to understand the methods and madness of globalists is to research and understand the thinking of narcissistic sociopaths. This is, I believe, the big secret that we are not supposed to know about. The root factor that could change the world is if humanity finally realized that these people are not like us – they are a parasitic species which feeds off of us, and they are identifiable if you know what to look for.
Here are a few ground rules to understanding how such predators think and operate:
1) Narcissistic sociopaths make up around 1% to 5% of the total population, and are present in every culture and ethnicity. The vast majority of them carry the traits from birth. Many of them remain latent, meaning, they function within society and avoid destructive behavior because the environment makes this behavior unacceptable. However, at least 1% are full-blown psychopaths. During times of crisis and uncertainty people with latent traits tend to revert to destructive psychopathic behaviors because there are no social consequences to restrict them.
2) A psychopath is not insane in the manner many people might assume. Psychopaths are highly cognizant of their surroundings, and are adept at manipulating the people around them for their own gain. They know how to blend in, though, even the most skilled chameleons make mistakes and show their true colors They are also very aware when they are committing an evil act; they simply don’t care and feel no regret or remorse.
3) Psychopaths organize with each other constantly as long as there is a promise of personal gain involved. I’m not sure why, but there is a misconception among many people that all psychopaths are “loners” that do not work with anyone. I can only attribute this belief to mainstream propaganda. The most effective psychopaths hunt in packs. This can easily be seen in criminal enterprises such as cartels, the mob, certain corporate entities that have been exposed, and very often in governments.
I have personally witnessed multiple narc/sociopaths operate together in the same space. These people barely knew each other in some cases, but somehow picked up on instinctual cues and started working together to take over the room and dominate everyone’s attention and time. I have also witnessed narc/sociopaths help each other at random by manipulating a victim or mark back into position so that another narc/sociopath can continue feeding off of them.
Those people who claim that psychopaths could never organize into a conspiracy or cabal because they would sabotage each other have no understanding whatsoever as to how these criminals actually function.
4) Psychopathic people account for the vast majority of violent crime and fraud in the US and consume astonishing resources in terms of taxpayer dollars. There is also NO KNOWN METHOD of rehabilitation for these people. Why? Because narcissism and sociopathy are generally inherent at birth, and they make up the bulk of a psychopath’s personality. Take these two traits away, and the psychopath no longer has a personality. I repeat – these people cannot be fixed. They are what they are and will never change because they have no capacity for self examination and no other personality to fall back on.
5) Psychopaths often have very short attention spans, except when they are engaged in a predatory agenda. This might seem like a contradiction. How could they be so observant of the people around them to the point that they are expert manipulators, while also being oblivious? It is primarily a matter of predatory instinct.
They do not care about normal human associations and interactions if they are not getting fuel for their narcissism from the exchange. They may go through the motions of pretending that they are human, or, they may not. But, if they see an opportunity for gain at the expense of others, they suddenly become hyperfocused and highly industrious.
This is another behavior I have also witnessed personally. I have met narc/sociopaths that were lazy beyond all belief in their daily lives and who had no capacity to listen to other people even when the information might be useful. At the same time, when they saw a target or victim that they could exploit, they would suddenly plan elaborate schemes, spending months of energy building a web of lies and creating a chain of machinations to obtain what they coveted. If you are not familiar with narc/sociopaths, this kind of conduct will come off as extremely bizarre and befuddling.
6) Their lack of attention span in daily circumstances can be partly attributed to their addiction to dopamine. When they do focus, it is only to satisfy a dopamine rush, and the actions that give them the most dopamine rush are usually destructive or aberrant. Of course, over time the actions which gave them dopamine in the past become inadequate, and so they seek out even more aberrant and depraved activities to get the same high. Most narc/sociopaths will willingly engage in the most disturbed and twisted victimization imaginable just to feel a sharper flood of dopamine, as long as they think there will be no consequences.
7) Narc/sociopaths are not necessarily more intelligent or impressive, though they do tend to score higher than average in terms of IQ. They usually do not excel in anything, because they have no patience for mastery of a particular subject or skill. That said, they have a highly developed survival sense, in that they are very good at exploiting the skills of others. Meaning, they are good at manipulating other people who are intelligent and skilled and feeding off of their efforts.
This does not always last, though, as the people they exploit start to realize what is happening and cut the narc/sociopath loose. Most narc/sociopaths will cycle through non-narc associates quickly, and have no real “friends”. In an organized psychopathic group, everything is based on mutual gain and the targeting of victims. They are not friends or compatriots.
8) Narc/sociopaths are invariably cowards, and will rarely fight on a level playing field. They will either run, stab you in the back if they can, or use other people to do their dirty work.
Finally, narc/sociopaths have one particular quirk or obsession which I rarely see discussed, but it is a behavior which I think is central to explaining the methodology of globalists. Narc/sociopaths see themselves as far superior (or godlike) compared to normal people, and they view empathy and the capacity for joy in everyday things as weakness and foolishness. Therefore, they feel justified in their pursuit of dominance and exploitation of others. However, they also understand that they would be considered monstrous by society and face punishment if they are ever exposed.
They know to some extent that they are not human, that they are vampires that need to remain hidden in order to leech off of humans. In their pursuit of dopamine, they have probably engaged in some extremely evil activities, including fraud, corruption, rape, pedophilia or even murder. They don’t personally have any guilt over such actions, but, they know they would be burned at the stake for them.
Being that they see themselves as superior to the rest of us, they find it reprehensible that they should have to hide their true nature. They are “gods” among men, and it is demeaning to them to have to skulk about in the dark, or play act as if they are like us. The final behavior of narc/sociopaths that I want to mention here is their need to either prove that everyone else is just like them, or their need to make everyone else just as monstrous as they are.
I see this in particular with globalists; almost every agenda they engage in has an element of propaganda which encourages people to embrace a morally relativistic philosophy. They want us to engage in atrocities and view them as perfectly acceptable.
This is perhaps the primary rationale behind globalist engineered crisis events. In each instance of crisis, we are told that moral ambiguity is necessary in order to survive, and that empathy and principles are for suckers, or for times of peace only. We are also told that the natural states of human behavior and society are wrong and that we must accept the exact opposite, otherwise we are “bigoted” and are holding society back from progress.
Sure, there is also the elitist goal of convincing the masses to go along with less freedom and more centralization, and this cannot be discounted. But, there is also an underlying and more sought after goal of erasing our humanity altogether. From moral relativism, to digital distraction and our ever shortening attention spans, to the masses being encouraged to chase ever more dopamine, to the demonization of natural masculinity and femininity, to gender dysphoria, to the overt obsession with sexual gratification, to our growing acceptance of government subjugation as long as it is against our political opponents, to the use of war as a means to expand political influence – the globalists are attempting to turn human psychological reality on its head and make us just like them.
The problem for them is, we are not like them. Conscience and empathy are inherent and inborn qualities for us, just as narcissism and sociopathy are inborn qualities for them. We are undeniably different at a fundamental level. This is why they are forced to construct narratives of reason around the insanity they want us to approve of. They are forced to present evil actions as if they are for the greater good, because very few people would go along with them otherwise. They have spent the better part of centuries (maybe longer) trying to find ways to undermine our humanity, and have met with constant interference.
I sometimes take comfort in the fact that while the conspiracies of evil are always present and on the attack, they still fail to get what they truly want above all else. While the powers of good are not as visible at times, they are subtle and intricate, and cannot be easily undone.
BrotherBeowulf said:
Well Sam you’ve sure ignited a minor controversy here while I wasn’t looking!
First off, let’s not be too hard on our brother Michael, with whom I also respectfully disagree in part. But let’s acknowledge he has a good-faith point.
The Old Mass.
Latin universalizes it. It makes it for everyone, everywhere. Latin is also a more fitting language in which to address Our Lord God the Father.
I have to think however that our Lord Jesus Christ, our king and brother, wouldn’t mind if we try to speak to him in our native (and ofttimes only competent) tongue.
Thus for example after the official reading of the epistle and Gospel in Latin they may be read in English, Spanish, Polish or all three if there’s a suitably diverse congregation. As happens in NYC frequently at Our Lady of Mount Carmel, East Harlem.
On the other hand who needs a translation of the mighty Prologue to the Gospel of St John (the elimination of which is yet another fatal flaw in the novus ordo)? The Old Mass teaches us sufficient Latin over time to enter into and understand the great mysteries! We need only be patient!
As to ad Orientam, it doesn’t solve the problem of the severe deficiencies of the new Mass. Not even close. It sacrifices the Sacrifice on the altar of popularity, Protestantism and false piety of a shared meal.
Best to all and happy Feast of St Pascal Baylon!
B B
P. S. Agreed on Mr. Voris. Firing on all eight right now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wanda said:
Where evil abounds, Grace abounds more. We’re looking at some pretty evil stuff going on at the present moment. We need to avail ourselves of the Grace that Our Lord wishes to give us, won at so great a price on Calvary. He has already won the victory, we just need to remain on the winning side…no matter what. The goal is eternal happiness in Heaven. Keep your eyes on the prize and try to bring as many other people as you can with you. Deus Vult.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Steve D said:
Have to disagree with his assessment that they are born this way. That is no different than homosexuals arguing they are also born that way. Yes, it’s possible they may have some inborn predisposition to certain behaviors, but we are all given free will.
LikeLiked by 2 people
guy Mcclung said:
So, accept all of this as stated as true, then what? Here is where I end up: Each person is made unique in and by God’s love, and this love keeps him or her in existence every moment. Made out of this infinite love with free will, truly free, there are unique good actions with good ends that can only be done by each unique person. You reading this-no one else can do your uniquely good actions, only you.
In doing one’s own uniquely good action, one brings good into existence and “makes” a good that no one else can make. And no power can unring this bell, no power can unmake the unique good a unique peson can make. This good is the weapon against all the evil. Feed a hungry man, give shelter to a bag lady, save an unborn child and thereby save the child’s mama, no psycopath can make such good not exist once it is ‘made.”. Good is forever.
This good – each freely chosen good action – each fullofwonder unique good – is how the “world rulers of this present darkness” are utterly defeated. Make good and not only avoid evil, but destroy it. Guy McClung, Texas
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kate R. said:
It’s been decades, literally decades, trying to figure out what is going on and who is on what side. We are only now able to see more clearly who is on the side of Christ and who is not. There are posers, people who have fooled us, certainly we would have been shocked ten years ago to imagine virtually no cardinals or bishops would vehemently defend the faith in the face of a rogue pope! Yet we see we have almost none of those, and while many pundits or paid Catholics have an opinion, they are often defenders of the heresies or cult of personality that still surrounds this obviously apostate pope and globalist champion. We have a very short list of people clearly with us. Many Catholics, the remaining middle, just don’t really care or notice. Stunning.
I was a supporter of CM, and disappointed when they refused to criticize the pope and banned me. I’m delighted they sorted it out, we need their voice as they are all good at what they do, and Michael Voris in particular.
God help us, the ants that take on the elephant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Dowd said:
Kate R. Good comment. You really need to get on the Voris bandwagon again. He doing great work. I was thinking of sponsoring a funding raising effect down here in sinful Florida. It could be called Fund for the Salvation of the Faith or something like that.
LikeLike
Michael Dowd said:
Revised note to Kate R. Good comment Kate. You really need to get on the Voris bandwagon again. He doing great work.
I was thinking of sponsoring a fund raising event down here in sinful Florida. It could be called Fund for the Salvation of the Faith or something that sounds like the Bishops annual fund to which I no longer contribute. We need lots of old people to help save the faith. Trouble is most of them don’t know there’s a problem.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Michael Dowd said:
Yes. Michael Voris is no longer pulling punches on Pope Francis and has restored his credibility in my mind.
I was banned from commenting on Church Militant some time ago for criticizing Pope (?) Francis. I had the ban lifted after Michael started telling the whole truth about this monster.
Michael is the go to guy for the press among crazed far right traditional Catholic bloggers and commentators. That is something to be proud of. I suppose they called Jesus early followers far left. Times change.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Yes, Michael has been quite the surprise.
A very positive development…
I read this as Opus Dei starting to do objective reality…
LikeLike
vrs said:
Can Opus Dei – “the heart and brain of the Conciliar church” as Fr. Hesse (RIP) used to call them – be credible?
In my country I see them trying to attract the youth turning to the traditional Catholic Mass organizing actively events labeled “traditional” (such as pilgrimages to Mons Clara or Lenten retreats) with a subtle promotion of Marquis of Peralta machine in the background. In my humble opinion it is the greatest danger in the Catholic renewal – selling the traditional Mass in nice looking package with the post-conciliar doctrine
—-
“Whether it’s members of the Catholic Church following Christ, Jesuits following St. Ignatius of Loyola or Opus Dei members following St. Josémaría Escrivá, questions of fidelity inevitably arise. Scandal is plaguing Opus Dei, the community of clerics and laity founded by St. Escrivá in 1928. His vision that holiness is for everyone and is accomplished in the ordinary acts of daily life has helped many Catholics draw closer to God.” (churchmilitant.com, April 2019)
LikeLike
Michael Dowd said:
VRS. When I was a Cooperator member of Opus Dei I was told that Catholic Family News was bad, along Christopher A. Ferrara, etc. Vatican II is their big thing. When I starting raising questions about the results Vatican II I became something of an outcast. They are also adamantly against SSPX. Randy Engel is an expert Opus Dei. Check her out: https://akacatholic.com/opus-dei-watch/
What must happen in my opinion is that Vatican II be abrogated in its entirety in order to re-establish the authentic Traditional Catholic Church. No half measures will do. This raises questions about the survival of Opus Dei and the Legionaries of Christ’s Regnum Christi groups. I think both should be done away with. They have caused much trouble with their surreptitious politicking, money raising and secrecy.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Kate R. said:
This is why I am now much more skeptical of groups. We give gift cards to faithful diocesan priests, no more money to the diocese at all. We have no way of knowing what happens to the gift cards. We can’t in good faith give money at all to the church, never again, unless things change drastically.
My current policy is, we’re in this together until you show me you’re not. There are so many who are not, either because they don’t know any better or they are purposefully on the other side. There are definite “sides”, because we have two churches, unrecognized because of Schism-phobia on the part of clerics. They have done us a disservice by their cowardice on this issue. Souls are lost because they refuse to openly acknowledge what we already know, that we have two churches.
I tend to be pessimistic and think nothing will make a difference on the local level. My approach needs to include more communication with our local bishop, for what it’s worth (he’s a Francis-ite). Other than that, increased prayer life (it’s hard!), and defense of true Catholicism and morals wherever I come across the debate.
Onward Christian soldiers, marching as to war.
LikeLiked by 3 people
JTLiuzza said:
“What must happen in my opinion is that Vatican II be abrogated in its entirety in order to re-establish the authentic Traditional Catholic Church.”
Except for the mass that it produced, which you would prefer remain in place. That mass is unquestionably the biggest stink bomb the council produced and has done and continues to do the most damage to the faith by far.
I’ll never understand how you don’t see the glaring contradiction of you beating the drum daily about abrogating the council “in its entirety” on the one hand, then stating your preference to retain the most destructive force the council produced: the novus ordo mass on the other.
Aside from the obvious contradiction in your position, do you see that it would be impossible to practically execute the course of action you advocate daily, i.e. abrogate the council in it’s entirety, except leave Sacrosanctum Concilium in place because that’s a good part? So not really “entirety” but almost.
I’m not trying to pick at you here, Michael. I enjoy your posts where I read them here and there. I just don’t get the giant disconnect in your most valued and most often espoused position.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Dowd said:
JTLiuzza. My position has been that I like the Mass on English. I do not like the Novus Ordo Mass the way it is. If it could be made more reverent that is my first desire which might be able to be done. Ideally, we would go back to the Traditional Mass in either English or Latin.
LikeLike
JTLiuzza said:
I know what your position is, Michael, and thanks for your reply. What I’m saying is that it doesn’t follow, not even a little, from your stated position vis a vis the council and it, in fact, impeaches it.
And there is no such thing as a “Traditional Mass in English.”
LikeLike
Michael Dowd said:
JTLiuzza. You are being too rigid. There is no reason why the Traditional Latin Mass cannot be said in English. My concern is not to drive folks away from the Church by being overly doctrinaire.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Your competing positions are reconciled with ad Orientem worship. Nobdy knows what the priest is saying since he is facing God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JTLiuzza said:
The Church hasn’t been “overly doctrinaire,” or even a smidgen doctrinaire for 50 years. That’s the problem and that is the Church people have already fled in droves and the culture built on it has collapsed. Where the Church is “doctrinaire,” i.e. Tradition, people are attracted, especially young people.
The “too rigid” finger wagging further cements you in the camp of a certain Argentine. Whether you realize it or not, you’re every bit the modernist you pretend to oppose.
LikeLike
Michael Dowd said:
JTLiuzza. You are wrong and making false accusation about me. You should be ashamed of yourself and ask God for forgiveness. I will pray for you.
I believe that flexibility in strategy for the salvation of the Traditional Church is the opposite of Vatican II incorporation of Modernism in the Catholic Church thus making it Protestant.
A plan must be devised that doesn’t turn off those very folks who think Vatican II has gone too far.
LikeLike
vrs said:
You are right – and there the danger lies, similar to going to post-indult Masses (with the Catholic rite but often with new doctrine sermons or pastoral letters offensive to pious ears) but more subtle, thus more serious. Unfortunately, in my country many persons of good will are not aware of it, taking part in so-called “traditional” initiatives with OD in the background.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Akita said:
Hi,
Mass universally in Latin unites us! No separate Spanish and English Mass like in my local diocesan parish where “never the two shall meet”.
Latin is mystically sublime. We follow along in our
missals. I pray for the return of the universal Mass.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vrs said:
Mass as the highest form of worship of God and the Holy Sacrament of the Altar is one thing. The second one, or, in fact – the first, is Faith. Common Faith and Sacraments and the Petrine ministry, according to St. Robert Bellarmine, constitute the Church. Therefore, even if there is the universal Mass somewhere unless there is universal Faith in that place, it does not suffice. In Poland, so-called post-indult Masses are sometimes a pitiful example of that truth when there is a break between the Gospel and the Credo and something odd, modernist, out of place inserted there.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi…
… Lex Vivendi.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vrs said:
Yes, of course. Therefore, the situations I mentioned may constitute a terrible case of spiritual schizophrenia where lex orandi – credendi expressed by the Rite and the preaching during the sermon contradict each other.
LikeLike
S. Armaticus said:
YES!
LikeLike