Tags
#fakenews, Ann Barnhardt, chastity belts, Chlamydia trachomatis, Cryptosporidium, Cultural Marxism, Deconstructionism, Dr. Curt Doolittle, Father Anthony Cekada, Fox News, Francis Effect, FrancisChurch - In Liquidation, Frankfurt School, FSSP, Genderism, George Soros, Germania Delenda Est!, Germany, Giardia lamblia, Gonorrhea, Great Cardinal, Havana, Hemorrhoids, heretical pope, Herpes simplex virus, hippies, HIV, Holy Year of Mercy, Human immunodeficiency virus, Human papilloma virus, Humanism, Isospora belli, Jacque Derrida, James O'Keefe, Jesuits, Jesus Christ, Joseph Ratzinger, Jozef Pilsudski, Keynes, Keynesian Economics, Kirill I, Krakow, Law of Unintended Consequences, messeging, Mexico City, Microsporidia, Miracle on the Vistula, Modernists, MSM, narratives, Nassim Taleb, neo-modernism, Neo-Pagan, Net Neutrality, new springtime, New York Times, Nigel Farage, Pagan Christians, pathological, periti, Poland, Polish Bolshevik War 1920, Pontifical High Mass, Pope Pius VI, President Andrzej Duda, Project Veritas, r/K Selection Theory, Raymond Burke, Re-Traditionalization, Refugee Resettlement Watch blog, Republic of Poland, retained foreign bodies, risk event, Roman Curia, s "c"atholicZombie, s "theological structuring", s ABC News, s ABERRO AGENDA, s aberro-sex agenda, s AIDS, s Ambiguity, s Anal Cancer, s Ann Corcoran, s anorectal traum, s Archbishop of Warsaw- Praga, s Associated Press, s Austria, s Benedict XVI, s Bergoglio, s Big Gender, s Bio-History, s Boris Johnson, s BREXIT, s Card. Muller, s Cardinal Burke, s Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz, s cardinal Walter Kasper, s Catholic Church, s Chapel of the Holy Trinity, s Pope Francis, Saul Alinsky, sCatholic Church in Poland, Sexually transmitted diseases, spirit of Vatican II, SSPX, St Thomas Aquinas, sustainability, Synod 2014, Synod of Filth, Syphilis25, Tags #fakenarratives, Tags anal fissures, Tags Black Lives Matter, Team Bergoglio, The Remnant, The Scholasticum, theological deconstructionism, Thomism, Tradition, TransRational, Truth, Unjust ruler, Vatican II, Work of Human Hands, YouTube, Zombie, ZombieBishop
It’s all the doing of the GERMANS (and their money)!
Think about this the next time you are in the market to buy a car.
In the mean time, it might be a good idea to follow Steve Skojec (on Twitter) as he is working through his issues with Normalcy Bias:
The normalcy bias, or normality bias, is a belief people hold when there is a possibility of a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the likelihood of a disaster and its possible effects, because people believe that things will always function the way things normally have functioned. This may result in situations where people fail to adequately prepare themselves for disasters, and on a larger scale, the failure of governments to include the populace in its disaster preparations. About 70% of people reportedly display normalcy bias in disasters.[1]
The normalcy bias can manifest itself in various disasters, ranging from car crashes to world-historical events. It is hypothesized that the normalcy bias may be caused by the way the brain processes new information. Stress slows information processing, and when the brain cannot find an acceptable response to a situation, it fixates on a single and sometimes default solution. This single resolution can result in unnecessary injury or death in disaster situations. The lack of preparation for disasters often leads to inadequate shelter, supplies, and evacuation plans. Thus, normalcy bias can cause people to drastically underestimate the effects of the disaster and assume that everything will be all right. The negative effects of normalcy bias can be combatted through the four stages of disaster response: preparation, warning, impact, and aftermath.
Normalcy bias has also been called analysis paralysis, the ostrich effect,[2] and by first responders, the negative panic.[3] The opposite of normalcy bias is overreaction, or worst-case scenario bias,[4][5] in which small deviations from normality are dealt with as signals of an impending catastrophe.
And here’s Steve…
It appears to be a “personal understanding” issue…
In the mean time, Ann Barnhardt has done the homework, is one step ahead and has it dead to right: (see HERE)
But the “discernment” continues…
As best I can tell, the sticking point in question is the validity of the 2013 Conclave issue.
So the caged grudge match between Steve and Austen Ivereigh is on!
Please keep Steve in your prayers.
More to come later…
The Deus Ex Machina Blog 
you’ve been after them to post.
did you know they were?
LikeLike
I have read a number of articles in 1P5 over the years, most have been very good.
It is disheartening to have to endure what we are enduring and see it all deteriorate into our pecking people to death. Personally I can’t take the drama, but that’s me.
From what all I gather, he has a large brood to provide for. Hey, I’ve got my expenses and financial concerns, I’m sure most of you do as well. If we find we’re in the wrong biz, we’ve got to move on. Maybe he does too, but I feel like he is an intelligent guy with some skills, and he clearly cares about matters pertaining to Catholicism.
I’d wish for us to cut each other some slack. These are more than crazy times, these are insane apocalyptic Armageddon explosive dynamite in your cereal bowl crazy times. We’re all going to be unhinged by Bergolio’s antics if we don’t get a grip.
Crazy old bastard.
I’m just sayin, maybe it’s a good time to ease up. The world’s going to blow up in ten minutes anyway. God help all of us as we contend with the Apocalypse in our church.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“…I have an understanding of infallibility that precludes an invalid election.”
So THAT is his major premise????
It’s not shocking when a person is wrong-headed. What IS shocking is when his false premise turns out to be IDIOTIC. This theological illiterate has been making a living off Catholicism for years!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Canon212 Update: If The ‘Church’ Can’t Deal With Francis and Give Us A Catholic Pope, Then It’s The Entity That’s Not Catholic, Not the Faithful – The Stumbling Block
Aquinas quoting Aristotle: “A small mistake in the beginning is a large one in the end”
If a conclave ruled by heretics and motivated by heresy, is made valid simply because their deceptive election of a heretic is “universally accepted” on the surface as a charade –
how in the world does that equation add up to any sort of valid Truth?
All that amounts to is a popular vote to validate the charade of an intentional error.
Also: when was the last time Skojec ever acknowledged his mistakes?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Technically, the Ground Zero of Vatican II is… Vatican II, not distant, bergoglian waves of the Big Bang of new universe of faith.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your statement is illogical. A gathering can not be ground zero. Ground is a species of land, land is a fixed location. Fixed locations have names. The relevant name in this instance is VATICAN CITY STATE. It would also be an error to say that this happened at ROME. It did happen in the DIOCESE of the VATICAN CITY STATE AND ROME, but this is not the same entity as ROME. Ground Zero of Vatican II is the VATICAN CITY STATE. Sorry, but this is on the head of Pius XII.
LikeLike
If I were the bergolian I would answer: “time is greater than space”. However, I am not, so I will say: if you threw out time from our reality, then, yes, the statement would be illogical. But doing that would be illogical. The Vatican II continuum has its zone of origin/beginning and it is precisely the gathering in the 1960’s. The location Rome, or, e.g. Ephesus, has secondary importance. What was before the beginning? Simply: the Church, yes with some hidden heretics but never gaining the upper hand in such kind of breakthrough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even if I was to accept your premise that is was a matter of secondary importance, that still would not make it a matter of no importance. In a matter of great importance, secondary and tertiary concerns must be carefully weighed. I propose that it is actually a matter of first importance, because the promises for the indefectability of the Church are associated with the See of St. Peter, bishop of the entity ROME not the entity VATICAN CITY STATE. There isn’t even need to have recourse to conspiracy theory to prove that this was an action of the Freemasons, as it was all publicly declared Freemasons that lead the Italian unification wars. It was Freemasonry that deprived the Church of Her rightful property, ROME.
LikeLike
Deprivation by freemasonry of Rome does not mean that Pope has ceased his role as the bishop of Rome. It also has nothing to do with Vatican II continuum. For example, St. Pius X was the prisoner of Vatican and the bishop of Rome. He is not connected in any way with Vatican II era. Neither he lost infallibility nor the Church lost her indefectability. The Church had her indefectability from the beginning – even before Peter became the bishop of Rome.
LikeLike
My, my how you all struggle so.
Let me lay this out for you.
1. What is the this two popes business all about? Ans: First off, there are not two popes. that is an impossibility. what is happening is that the inter-religious registry that the VATICAN CITY STATE [vessels are always written in ALLCAPS] was given, as its dowry when it was founded, to administer [priests are ministers…ministers are agents…agents serve interests…in this case the religious interests… but not exclusively].
2. Is the ancient priesthood that was formerly and historically associated with the legal entity ROME but now domiciled in a novel entity called the VATICAN CITY STATE the only religious agency in town? Ans: No, of course not. The Tribe wishes to get into the game. Their plan is to pry this registry away from the ancient guild of priests formerly domiciled at ROME and move the operation to JERUSALEM where it will be housed in the 3rd version of the temple. [a temple is a bank like where money changers operate]
3. What is your proof for this? The Rainbow flag. It is not the flag of the sexually irrational rather it is the flag of Noah which the talmudists have read means God won’t punish us. It is the flag of the Noahide laws. Practically speaking, most people are functionally atheist. That means they have dishonored the presentments of God. This will simply seal the deal.
4. The current fellow that is getting everyone so worked up [central casting just wow!] is there to bring down the credit [root: credo, I believe, accept, affirm] rating of the organization he is presented as the public face of. Alas, this presentment has gone unrebutted. This is a classic tactic. See the Colin Capknikkers antics where he is a life time actor driving down the price of NFL teams so the owners are put into distress and forced to sell on the cheap.
5. The aim in this situation is to get Catholics, and anybody else who might care to, to disrespect the office. This is another commercial tactic. it activates an action.
6. We are dealing with the registration of vessels. Vessels move on the water. The movement of the people is the abiding concern of the current occupants of the former offices of the Roman Catholic Church.
7. Catholic religion teaches stability. Stability is opposed to movement. Therefore the Catholic presentment of true religion has to go.
I feel like I was channeling the Sarmaticus of old, like prior to the Hilary White intervention, when you’d talk about agenda.
All of this is to stir the passions; to press upon and increase the concupiscence. It is working. However, Christians, let me remind you, our holy religion, given to us by True God and True Man, Who can neither deceive nor be deceived [which means He has the very highest credit rating, His word is His bond, and His bond rating is Double Extra Super Golden AAA] teaches us that our will is free. Meditate upon this truth and learn what it means for you, both in the interior movements of the soul and in your exterior movements of contact and contract.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A rainbow has 7 colors, the gay flag only 6…
LikeLike
Perhaps donor suspension would give Steve pause. That, plus keep making the case for Ann’s thesis on One Peter 5 in the comment section.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Skojec’s traffic on IP5 is down significantly – as is the gravy-train of his donations. All because he has been so toxic to anyone who dares disagree with him however polite they try to be. And he’s been causing flame-wars on his twitter account with other Catholics over his loss of “happiness” due to his loss of revenue.
He recently ignited such a war a few days ago with his astounding announcement that $100k flowing isn’t enough for his lifestyle – EVEN if he didn’t have to work. Because he doesn’t “aspire to mediocrity” you see. He deserves better thing$. Plus he really likes his expensive Jeep because it makes him happy plowing up and down the hilly deserts-cape or something. The $truggle is real. He deserve$ better!
He thinks money = happiness and Catholic guilt = poverty.
Oh but hey- he’s only concerned with providing for his family. Even though he roosts on twitter 14 hours a day insulting people. Also – his donors should be grateful that he’s there to guide them with his wondrous talents. He’s a genius master of everything he does.
My point to all this? THIS is the formative basis for Skojec’s “Catholicism” – it’s just a career. It’s a means to a lucrative end. And he’s currently looking at other career options because he knows his toxic personality has pretty much sabotaged his golden goose. So anyone who thinks they can persuade him with calm reasonable arguments is just wasting their time. It’s all about his ego and his fear of losing credibility and by extension – more dollar$
LikeLiked by 1 person
About five years ago, I pointed out a typo on 1P5. Skojec’s email response would have been appropriate if I had cooked and eaten one of his children. I got banned, finally, for defending Ann Barnhardt from one of Skojec’s hatchet attacks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have been one of Steve’s top donors as he pointed out in a letter to me some months ago. That has now ended. Steve in trying to convey a balanced point of view has become unbalanced in the process. He has missed the change in the Overton Window*** on what is now acceptable to discuss among orthodox Catholics about the “Pope”, etc.
***”The Overton window is the range of ideas tolerated in public discourse, also known as the window of discourse. The term is named after Joseph P. Overton, who stated that an idea’s political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within this range, rather than on politicians’ individual preferences”. Wikipedia
LikeLiked by 2 people
Please don’t ever donate anymore money to that greedy juvenile. It’s just throwing stupid gas onto crazy fire.
He’s openly admitted that he frequently drinks – starting in the afternoon. And obviously online.
Now just let that sink in for a bit. People need to know who and WHAT he is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stevie has raised to an infallible dogma his own misunderstanding of universal acceptance, which was never dogma but merely theological opinion. the correct opinion given by Saint John of St Thomas is that the universal acceptance of a VALIDLY ELECTED ROMAN PONTIFF is an infallible sign of the continuation of the Apostolic Succession in the See of St Peter. But Stevie has inverted it to read, if the quasi unanimity of the faithful, whether by truth or by MSM lies, comes to think that anyone is the pope, whether man or woman or monkey, then that means infallibly that that man or woman or monkey is the pope, and if you disagree you are insane or a heretic or a schismatic. And if you disagree with my opinion on this, I will berate you and block you. — Yes, let us pray for Stevie, he has a lot of issues.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I think Ann Barnhardt did a great job of explaining where Steve got it wrong.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2019/10/08/logic-universal-peaceful-acceptance-must-proceed-from-a-lawful-conclave-legality-is-the-required-antecedent-to-upa/
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep. You nailed it. And yes, Stevie does have some serious “issues”
LikeLike